tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post4860533447187693846..comments2024-03-07T10:02:32.188-08:00Comments on The Atlantean Conspiracy: Flat Earth Enlightenment From LighthousesEric Dubayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11495527904246265068noreply@blogger.comBlogger55125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-10101944664139493792016-04-18T22:27:07.631-07:002016-04-18T22:27:07.631-07:00Who is the author of "the lighthouses of the ...Who is the author of "the lighthouses of the world" book?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-71097996563625629862016-04-11T04:45:21.009-07:002016-04-11T04:45:21.009-07:00Putting it another way ...
When you look at a pho...Putting it another way ...<br /><br />When you look at a photograph that demonstrates perspective , one that has lamp or fence posts or uprights at a regular interval or a train track with sleepers etc , you notice that as distance increases , the perceived size of similar objects decreases , but the rate of decrease is smaller each time , the perceived distance between objects at a similar distance , also decreases and the rate of decrease is also smaller each time <br /><br />So ...<br /><br />If you had a 4m disc and a 10mm disc ( size ratio being 400 to 1 ) and you placed the small disc 1m away and the large disc 400m away ( distance ratio being 400 to 1 ) ... would they appear the same size ? <br /><br />What if you then doubled the distance of both discs ? Would they still appear the same size from the viewpoint of the observer ? <br /><br />What if you doubled the diameter of each disc ? Again still keeping the size and distance ratios at 400 to 1 , but as with doubling the distance , only changing one side of the equation ... Would they still appear to be the same size ? <br /><br />It is illogical , considering the nature of perceived size and distance due to perspective <br /><br />Consider having both discs 1m away from the observer (a camera) , then incrementally moving the large disc away at 4 m intervals (giving 100 increments for simplicity) taking a photograph with each increment ... <br /><br />The photographs then measured to determine the decrease in size of the large disc ... Would each increment decrease the visual size of the the large disc by 1% ? Finally , when the ratios match at 400 to 1 for stance and size , appearing to be the same ? <br /><br />What happens if the ratios for both size and distance are 200 to 1 , or less or more ? <br /><br />Is the ratio the important factor ? Or is it the distance , or the size ? Or is it just pure chance that the actual sizes and distances of the sun and moon align perfectly with the maths , physics etc that supposedly determined this to be fact ? <br /><br /><br /><br />Leahnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-68833689170750639872016-04-09T18:17:41.674-07:002016-04-09T18:17:41.674-07:00Dear Eric
I've been thinking about the stars...Dear Eric <br /><br />I've been thinking about the stars visible to the naked eye in the night sky and the fact that the constellations have not changed in all of known history ... Globe theory makes things too complex and beyond most peoples capabilities of reasoning ... <br /><br />The globe model dictates that the visible stars are at extreme distances from us , as well as from each other , the closest being four light years away , the furthest being a lot lot further ...<br /><br />The same goes for each constellation , the stars that make up the shape of the constellation being nowhere near each other etc ... <br /><br />All of these stars including our sun are travelling at differing extreme speeds through the universe or around our galaxy , also supposedly away from each other <br /><br />Then consider our earths elliptical orbit , it's tilt , it's wobble on it's axis etc , the fact it's chasing the sun in a spiral orbit as the sun travels around the galaxy , no doubt also in a spiral orbit , like earth and the planets of the solar system , the stars of the galaxy also chasing the black hole at its centre <br /><br />With all those random variables , it has to be impossible , that after all the earths hundreds of thousands of supposed daily rotations , thousands of yearly rotations around the sun , and the portion of the galaxy that we have supposedly moved around in that time ... That the stars visible to the naked eye would remain in the same recognisable patterns !?!?!<br /><br />For that to be possible , the stars that are further away from us would have to be moving faster than the stars closest to us , at a factor relative to the speed and distance of the star in relation to all other stars , as well as to the speed of light and time taken for the light to reach us <br /><br /><br />Also , how does light travel such vast distances ? Considering that light is supposed to radiate outward in every direction from its origin ... At vast distances , with the origin being so far away , how does any of the light reach us ? Do the light rays not open up and gain distance between each other as they travel away from the source in every direction ? <br /><br />Surely light particles or whatever they are , would have to travel parallel to one and other , or multiply continuously , to travel such vast distances from one moving object - and be visible on another <br /><br /><br />Have been thinking about the sun and moon too ... To the naked eye they appear the same size , yet one is 240000 miles away and the other is 93,000,000 miles ?<br /><br />Science says the reason the moon perfectly eclipses the sun is because the sun is 400 times bigger than the moon and also 400 times further away .... <br /><br />Ermmmm hello !?!? Yeah ok , that would be correct if you could correlate size and distance with perspective ... <br /><br />When something is moving away from you or you are moving away from something at a steady speed , your perspective of the opposite object changes ... At first the perceived and observed decrease in size of the object is quick , yet as it gets further away this decrease in size slows down ... <br /><br />Consider this , a graph with x axis being size and y axis being distance <br /><br />The explanation that the sun is 400 times bigger and 400 times further away than the moon , would necessitate a straight line graph ... The explanation stating that 'actual size' and distance , correlate to 'perceived size' at any given distance <br /><br />However the real graph would be a curved graph , as perceived change in size is large when the object moving toward or away from the observer is at a close distance - and yet small when moving toward or away at a vast distance ... <br /><br />Leahnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-17444922172474003012016-01-07T13:51:34.775-08:002016-01-07T13:51:34.775-08:00Hello Eric,
I am absolutely convinced that the Ea...<br />Hello Eric,<br /><br />I am absolutely convinced that the Earth is Flat based on your findings. I have purchased and read your book the Flat Earth Conspiracy and I intend to buy the others when Amazon says they are in stock. I am amazed by the amount of scientific and common sense proof out there that point to a flat earth and the lack of proof for a globe earth model. I am terrified by the amount and detail of the global conspiracy towards a New World Order, I have been expecting that for a number of years but the Flat Earth took me by surprise.<br /><br />I have a question regarding the Apollo Space programs and their validity and the entire model of the Universe. The evidence and photographs of the Universe is very large both from our Mason friends as well as amateurs so I do tend to lean towards the existence of a smaller scale Universe with stars so called planets and galaxies all inside the Firmament as described in the Bible.<br /><br />Based on the assumption that the Van Allen Radiation Belt is Nasa's interpretation of the Firmament and since all celestial objects according our biblical model are inside the Firmament then the possibility of man travelling and in fact reaching these bodies is very real since they are inside the Van Allen Radiation Belt. Can you comment on this, or anyone else for this matter Thank you Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-63209728256551911452015-08-31T01:29:52.299-07:002015-08-31T01:29:52.299-07:00I buy we live on a Flat Earth.
My question is &quo...I buy we live on a Flat Earth.<br />My question is "What causes Earthquakes & Volcanoes"?<br />That's the question I get asked often & I can't give an anwser.<br />Can you enlighten me? Please.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-67708262385994637032015-08-14T14:43:48.378-07:002015-08-14T14:43:48.378-07:00Hi Eric....
I must say that this topic/debate is ...Hi Eric....<br /><br />I must say that this topic/debate is thought provoking and exciting to say the least. I have researched the flat earth theory for about two months. While I am not 100% convinced....but am almost there. The one question I have for you is what is the number one "smoking gun" evidence that convinced you that the earth is flat. I look forward to your answer.apollo11noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-25860794969867912082015-07-08T04:40:53.508-07:002015-07-08T04:40:53.508-07:00I'm curious which map should be used. Google ...I'm curious which map should be used. Google searches of Hammonds Projection bring up http://i.imgur.com/9XsxSvC.jpg which kinda stinks.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-81467845905325565262015-06-14T06:19:26.972-07:002015-06-14T06:19:26.972-07:00water is flat,sir--you are correct! sea-level find...water is flat,sir--you are correct! sea-level finds 'level'-as do all lakes!arctouristhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11652172897705419552noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-18117498687450967892015-05-15T10:20:35.303-07:002015-05-15T10:20:35.303-07:00Eric,wouldn't the water be flat? You've sa...Eric,wouldn't the water be flat? You've said it yourself, water self levels.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-27270999568430819442015-05-05T11:53:25.849-07:002015-05-05T11:53:25.849-07:00hey you guys,
why's it always lighthouses,
i...hey you guys,<br /> why's it always lighthouses,<br /> i mean why should such primitive things be necessary in our modern world now,especially since these 'experts' got so much faith in their 'gee-pee-ess'and all that crap,right?<br /> seems to me,you just can't have it both ways...either the earth is much bigger than they say,or else it's really some weird 'plane' on some larger world...it's no longer inconceivable,anyways,i guess...<br /> almost nothing should surprise us anymore,y'know?arctouristhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11652172897705419552noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-52187539112398936262015-04-29T08:40:38.364-07:002015-04-29T08:40:38.364-07:00How do you deal with the objection that this is a ...How do you deal with the objection that this is a "superior mirage": http://www.abc57.com/story/28925566/mirage-of-chicago-skyline-seen-from-michigan-shorelineAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-31694623716078077802015-04-26T13:44:54.728-07:002015-04-26T13:44:54.728-07:00Eric, I recently signed in the IFERS forum and pos...Eric, I recently signed in the IFERS forum and posted a message about my own thinking on the miles per degree longitude problem at the same latitude in the north and south. The next day I was banned. Why? Rickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12673742038163466352noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-15131955109087908342015-04-20T20:26:57.652-07:002015-04-20T20:26:57.652-07:00Hi,
I live in Wellington, New Zealand and have n...Hi, <br /><br />I live in Wellington, New Zealand and have no knowledge of or awareness of the location of the Port Nicholson Light. Can you advise where this is? Wellington is generally accepted as being Port Nicholson. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-53350490873275229662015-04-20T08:56:13.562-07:002015-04-20T08:56:13.562-07:00Hey, thanks Wendy, I've already heard and writ...Hey, thanks Wendy, I've already heard and <a href="http://ifers.boards.net/post/4403/thread" rel="nofollow">written a short response to their lies / misrepresentations here</a>.Eric Dubayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11495527904246265068noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-43385395729186889102015-04-20T08:42:43.793-07:002015-04-20T08:42:43.793-07:00Eric,
It is not necessary that you post my comment...Eric,<br />It is not necessary that you post my comment. I wanted you to be aware of this podcast. As far as I can tell, they are saying that you said things, (such as the earth moving upwards to explain gravity) that I don't think you actually said, as I would have questioned it while going over your research. <br /><br />http://21stcenturywire.com/2015/04/15/episode-3-boiler-room-live-talk-radio-wednesdays-on-the-acr-network/<br /><br />maybe you could post a rebuttal?<br />keep up the good work.<br />wendywornhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00157162145721730955noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-25654176627586074462015-04-18T23:22:27.277-07:002015-04-18T23:22:27.277-07:00Why They Lie to Us About the Flat Earth
Your frie...<a href="http://ifers.boards.net/thread/18/why-lie-flat-earth" rel="nofollow">Why They Lie to Us About the Flat Earth</a><br /><br />Your friend sounds like a liar to me Graham, or maybe he's just been very lucky. There are international treaties being enforced here. Him trying to tell you otherwise is silly. Read about Jarle Andhoy, Rodney Cluff and others. You can only go to the fake ceremonial south pole on their guided tours. Antarctica is completely off-limits to independent explorers. Listen to how the reacted when Mark Knight just said he's gonna go without permission in our <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5aB6oThGK8" rel="nofollow">Flat Earth Podcast</a>.Eric Dubayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11495527904246265068noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-78282700769552424462015-04-18T21:01:59.109-07:002015-04-18T21:01:59.109-07:00This just proves that we are living in a copy of t...This just proves that we are living in a copy of the real, both sides of debate have no full proof.<br /><br />Many people will be next surprised to know that, You are not even living on earth but a mere copy of it. <br /><br />If you think Hollywood is crazy with fiction wait till you explore further the flat earth phenomenon.Chrisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-18467419024749693402015-04-18T07:22:46.940-07:002015-04-18T07:22:46.940-07:00Basically the Sun Worshippers changed things five ...Basically the Sun Worshippers changed things five hundred years ago, to replace the earth as the center of the universe with the Sun. This is to discredit the Bible, so the Sun Worshippers can get all of Man kind to follow their Satanist Agenda with full consent. The Sun Worship replaces the old God of the Bible with Satan the Illuminated one. This Satanic Cult controls Mankind as though they where farm animals. Don't feel bad, billions of humans are now living in a world of lies, and they blindly do it with consentAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-64370211039796122262015-04-17T11:13:29.991-07:002015-04-17T11:13:29.991-07:00Can anyone tell me a reason why the shape of the e...Can anyone tell me a reason why the shape of the earth needs/needed to be hidden?? Or why it matters at all, all i see is people throwing theories around but offering no explanation as to why its been hidden, i mean who actually gains? I.E I can understand the conspiracy with 9/11 where america needed an excuse to raid a country, but then when you use a bit of rational thinking and logic you start to realise that to pull that off a phenomenal amout of people would have to be involved in the cover up, yet not on single human has slipped up or talked yet,Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-77180651800276268602015-04-17T10:47:36.226-07:002015-04-17T10:47:36.226-07:00why would whoever it is want us to believe the wor...why would whoever it is want us to believe the world is round if it is not....what would be the reason for this humungus lie ??karinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-67704594336519311782015-04-16T09:27:41.550-07:002015-04-16T09:27:41.550-07:00Hello Eric, I've listened to all your intervie...Hello Eric, I've listened to all your interviews and listened to a lot of other conjecture as well. I'm not sold on the 'official' meme by any means and I've questioned it since I was a kid in church kindergarten.<br /><br />I'm currently having a discussion with a friend who has told me he knows someone who has been to the South pole/antarctica numerous times and no one has tried to stop his progress.<br /><br />I have no way of knowing obviously one way or the other but he's telling me there are no blockades or interference to prevent anyone from entering. Have you , or anyone else you know tried to enter recently? I'm just curious as to whether someone has video proof of being stopped or turned away.<br /><br />Anyway, I appreciate what you're doing and would be interested in hearing what you have to say on this matter. Thanks and good luck in the future, this is an amazing time to be alive as I'm sure you'd agree.<br /><br />Respectfully, Grahamgillfinnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09085647487821707107noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-11942269225570324552015-04-15T15:15:19.035-07:002015-04-15T15:15:19.035-07:00Another thing too is most people dont realize the ...Another thing too is most people dont realize the UN uses flat earth maps. The ball earth maps are a hologram covering the true flat surface of this earth plane. That comment you made Anonymous makes since about us people being the reflection of the glass dome since everything is one consciousness and there is no I or you. These Zionist, Freemason, Illuminati magicians have pulled a very big trick on humanity. Everything from education, science, religion, government has lied to us. We must unlearn everything we have learned. The strange thing is all these other new age conspiracy sites dont mention or even question about flat earth. They always talk about the universe and aliens coming back to earth with no solid evidence. Seems to me the new age movements that talk about the universe and round earth are apart of the new world order or they are deceiving their selves. If people knew about flat earth as the truth they will know that not only there is a creator but we are a reflection of the creators mind. Maybe there are infinite flat planes of existence, the only other plane I know of really is the astral plane that is close to this 3d physical plane.Darriun18https://www.blogger.com/profile/07753285608606751828noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-70958774274900754882015-04-14T20:40:44.239-07:002015-04-14T20:40:44.239-07:00http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/video/amazing-wat...http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/video/amazing-water-bubble-grows-space-26807543<br /><br /><br /><br />how do they do this?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-52410871953847502552015-04-14T20:34:48.862-07:002015-04-14T20:34:48.862-07:00The glass firmament above us is the looking glass ...The glass firmament above us is the looking glass of which Lewis Carroll wrote in his adventures of Alice in Wonderland which is full of masonic symbolism.<br /><br />We are the ones behind the looking glass. Everything here is inverted - the now popular phrase; doctors make you sick, schools make you dumb etc. The Vatican is the whore of Babylon, their God is Satan - the cult of El.<br />etc, etc.<br /><br />This world is full of Matt Hatters, Evil Queens and Cheshire Cats.<br /><br />We are all way down the rabbit whole and for answers we're going to have to look up for answers, back through the looking glass.<br /><br />Like little Charlie in Willy Wonka and Chocolate Factory, we have to find the magic lift to take us up up up all the way through the glass ceiling. Another story brimming with masonic symbolism.<br /><br />We are all like the character Mike, the little cowboy, shrunk to fit in the TV - Televisions use to be a glass tube - we are all Trumans in our very own Truman Show.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-44017667019303494202015-04-14T08:51:49.181-07:002015-04-14T08:51:49.181-07:00Another crazy thing if you're trying to find a...Another crazy thing if you're trying to find a flight from Papeete (French Polynesia) to Santiago de Chile. On ball earth this would be crazy not to do a direct flight over the pacific. However, these are not offered. You can find flights through Auckland, New Zealand or through Los Angeles, Mexico, Lima - which would be ludicrous, until you take a look at a flat earth map, then it makes perfect sense.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com