tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post726370545762963454..comments2024-03-07T10:02:32.188-08:00Comments on The Atlantean Conspiracy: The Flat-Earth Conspiracy ChallengeEric Dubayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11495527904246265068noreply@blogger.comBlogger70125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-86109369804180657502016-09-30T13:46:24.978-07:002016-09-30T13:46:24.978-07:00I need some help understanding something. The poin...I need some help understanding something. The point on the horizon where the sun sets in say May and December are actually 23.5degrees apart... and I have personally noted this where I live. Is it that there is a variation of 23.5 degrees in the suns movement throughout the year... please help me with this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-31848597524627217182016-08-09T18:50:35.107-07:002016-08-09T18:50:35.107-07:00Shills and trolls abound here. Reading the comment...Shills and trolls abound here. Reading the comments proves not only are you right on Eric, but your really pissing off the powers that fight truth. I bought all your books and find them excellent reading. Those of us that know understand the whiny tribe behind the lies... we also understand evil and its grip on falsehood. Please keep it up brother. Also I do Wing Tsun ( leon tings) and I'm 3rd level learning dummy and Chi Sau:) nothing but love bro. And remember.... the more looneys that attack you means the more your irritating pure EVIL... keep it up. John and Jason you are obviously idiots and shills.... its apparent to anyone who studies truth. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17759982655003939348noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-5025114522492062332016-04-01T18:56:45.441-07:002016-04-01T18:56:45.441-07:00I think most people would grasp this concept bette...I think most people would grasp this concept better if they could place themselves more accurately as to where we are in the current situation. According to the best of my ability to discern we are in a quasi nuclear[ close to the center] universe field near the origin core universe. This origin core universe first family as part of a natural progression found the sentient calculus instantiated high level numbers that represent sentients and were again part of the natural progression hijacked. The hijackers were themselves hijacked a few times until we reached a stable hegemony of the hijackers over the known instantiated plane. They branched out from the origin core universe exploring the supraverse cracking new universes, that gets boring so as part of a natural progression they crack new universes in such a way as to hopefully create a religious relic at inception [akin to building a house with nuclear bombs], this leads to universes being with cracked with flawed physics. This is one such universe, we are missing the destructive force portion of Universal Rewrite. When you roll a ball across the table a physical process is destroying the ball and recreating it very close by. In this universe the destructive force was missing so they provide it artificially, it is also known as a natural containment universe. This is where they put on the thieves and monsters they've found in the sentient calculus. If/when they are done with it, they simply stop providing the service of the destructive force and it collapses back into a cosmic soup of trails. There is a slight chance that a foreign entity could quantum entangly navigate to someplace close by where these homegrown thievery systems are generating data. If so, they wouldn't want them to be able to peer directly upon the world and see all the torture and torment going on. Again part of the natural progression, if you see a planet it's one thing to look at it on the surface[ receive light from it], yet to deep scan the entire block of supraversal space and examine every bit of it would be intrusive. So they put this thievery system INSIDE a rock, with a few harmless little bases with non-thieves on the outside to say look we're life "don't scan us it would be rude". Meanwhile in the interior deep under several hundred layers of crust/hull earth is a hollow concave sphere with a flat earth sitting on the bottom and buffering us from the wall is antarctica.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-88775707530887604772016-01-17T00:48:31.405-08:002016-01-17T00:48:31.405-08:00Eric,
It has been a year since I stumbled upon th...Eric,<br /><br />It has been a year since I stumbled upon the "Flat Earth Conspiracy". It has been a wonderful adventure discovering that our beloved earth is flat, and our world is the center of creation. Thanks for all the videos and books. It truly shook the foundations of my world.<br /><br />Charles Lindell<br />Charles Lindellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09453921252435547236noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-54937522098958883812015-08-25T10:55:31.632-07:002015-08-25T10:55:31.632-07:00hey eric I just wanted to let you know that the wh...hey eric I just wanted to let you know that the whole flat earth idea Is a fact, and I thank you for opening my eyes to see that! I personally believe in the bible and a higher power and your evidence supports the creation that was described by GOD<br />hiding what the earth actually looks like hides God and places a higher power at the bottom while raising nasa and all the freemason beliefs to the top! the only sad thing is that this deception is supposed to work therefore no matter what people will continue to believe in what nasa has taught them! you have a supporter right here thanks bro -DRANIKSOUFdraniksoufhttp://www.youtube.com/draniksoufnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-40170584795765453232015-07-09T06:01:47.941-07:002015-07-09T06:01:47.941-07:00Hello truth seekers. I just realised after several...Hello truth seekers. I just realised after several months of analysing all the available data on this subject that there is a way to end this debate once and for all. If the earth is a globe then the sun should take a curved path across the sky from sunrise to sunset. If on the other hand it's a plane then the sun will take a triangular path as the laws of perspective come into effect. <br /><br />The path of the sun could be recorded with some kind of time lapse photography from sunrise to sunset. If the earth is a globe this curve effect would be most noticeable below the tropic of capricorn and above the tropic of cancer as you would be looking at the suns path from the side which should be curved. If you were to look at the suns path between the tropics you would be looking straight up and its path would be straight and unable to give us the effect we are looking for. If the earth is flat then time lapse photography taken either above the tropic of cancer or below the tropic of Capricorn should give us a triangular path.<br /><br />Do u have any objections to discovering the ultimate truth of your theory Eric?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-42263270365460921512015-05-24T22:57:02.695-07:002015-05-24T22:57:02.695-07:00Hey Eric,
First of all thank you for your diligen...Hey Eric,<br /><br />First of all thank you for your diligent research in this area, it has truly been an eye-opening few weeks since I discovered this information, can't remember having my mind feel this blown since I realized 9/11 was a con in 2005 which activated my search for the truth.<br /><br />Having reviewed the available online material, of which yours is the most useful, followed by Matt Boylan's, I do have some questions, one of which is primary. That one has been brought up in the comments already, but has not been satisfactorily addressed -- the Southern Pole Star conundrum.<br /><br />If the stars are luminaries revolving around the Earth's North Pole as center of the Universe, we would expect to see ever larger concentric star trails in the night sky the farther South one is located. Instead, we do see the stars rotating around another focal point, to which the nearest star is Sigma Octantis. This phenomenon implies a spherical geometry. My mind is open and it hooks on this point. By this fact, either the planet must be sphere, or the night sky is a sphere rotating around the flat earth.<br /><br />This geometry twists my brain, an infinite plain contained within a rotating sphere is difficult to picture. Not impossible, but complicated and therefore unlikely.<br /><br />My other main question is meteorites, but I feel that this and the prior question may be ones that we simply don't have the answers for just yet. The mystery makes it fun though, eh?<br /><br />I will be buying your book but haven't yet so please excuse my ignorance of pertinent facts you may have referenced therein.<br /><br />Thanks again,<br /><br />- MangoMangonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-71963883673476684142015-05-14T01:05:58.629-07:002015-05-14T01:05:58.629-07:00Is there an explanation in the flat earth theory ...Is there an explanation in the flat earth theory to explain the arctic winter and summer, when we have 24 hours of night or day? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-34614955485228786302015-05-05T12:24:58.966-07:002015-05-05T12:24:58.966-07:00Hi Eric, Surely if the earth was flat then why i...Hi Eric, Surely if the earth was flat then why is it , say, night in Australia and daytime in England at the same time? Bert. Berthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02324428872702288702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-50728533389113420232015-05-05T12:20:15.417-07:002015-05-05T12:20:15.417-07:00Hi Eric. I was listening to an interview you did o...Hi Eric. I was listening to an interview you did on the higherside chats and one thing that occurred to me was surely if the earth was flat then where ever you were on the planet it would be the same time of day. It couldn't be ,say, night in Australia and daytime in England at the same time.??? Look forward to your reply. Cheers , Bert.Berthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02324428872702288702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-70440124558888778932015-04-12T20:47:08.116-07:002015-04-12T20:47:08.116-07:00Hi Eric,
I just finished watching the last video ...Hi Eric,<br /><br />I just finished watching the last video about the flat earth on your website.<br />At the end it said that LA to Tokyo is the same flight duration as Tokyo to LA. In reality there is about 2 hrs of difference, the Westward headed flight is 2 hrs shorter. If the Earth is not spinning, why would that be?<br /><br />Thank youAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-22877426139139204862015-03-26T02:26:10.035-07:002015-03-26T02:26:10.035-07:00Hi Eric, I would say most of the information you g...Hi Eric, I would say most of the information you gave about Zionism is probably correct but that's all beside the point. I was just making a general observation that it's easier for people to blame other people than realise their own power and take responsibility, such as blaming Jews, Nazis or Freemasons. There is a saying that if you don't have your own plan you will become part of someone else's plan. <br /><br />The Jews/Zionists aren't the only problem in the world this is also true of Christianity blaming the Jews and expecting Jesus to come and save the world. There seems to be a common theme of blame (Jews killed Jesus and Jesus the scapegoat who takes all our sins away) and then expecting someone else to fix everything (Jesus will return to make everything better). The very opposite of personal responsibility. This is all done to make us dependant on the thing that will make everything 'better', a system of control, by taking our personal responsibility away. This is similar to what your conspiracy theory is doing, blaming Freemasons for everything then expecting everything to be better by somehow understanding that we live in a snow globe looked down upon by god??<br /><br />Anyway I have nothing good to say about religion, it's the politicization of spirituality. A prison of the mind used to divide and control people.<br /><br />Besides all that u somehow manage to weasel your way around all the cracks I bring up everytime. U still haven't explained why the sun dosn't follow your flat earth predictions?? According to the flat earth model the sun should shrink into a vanishing point (your words) and 'set' (even though no setting would actually occur) ABOVE the horizon. Sunset implies going below the horizon which in your model it would never do.<br /><br />In the globe earth model the sun would stay the same size across the sky and actually go below the horizon. How can u explain the sun when it is only half set and you can quite clearly see half the sun above the horizon and half below? In your model it should have shrunk and vanished by now above the horizon.<br /><br />It seems as if you have bamboozled yourself so severely that you are unable to reconcile reality with your model and are consequently in a state of denial having put so much time and effort into this idea not to mention taking people's money based on a misunderstanding of reality.<br /><br />As for the moon you have again bamboozled yourself and subsequently had to come up with a convoluted explanation to reconcile reality with your model.<br /><br />Occums razor is there for a reason and not so we can come up with theocentric snow globe explanations of the world. Even though it makes you feel more special to believe so. You should stick to what u r good at philosophy and stay away from science. You wouldn't go to a chinese restaurant to buy french fries would you? <br /><br />For what it's worth I genuinely think u r special and appreciate the work u do I just think u have gone down the wrong rabbit hole with this one. Anyone else reading please feel free to join the conversation.<br /><br />I look forward to your rebuttal as always Eric. Peace. Jasonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-8764245800381146482015-03-25T20:55:47.285-07:002015-03-25T20:55:47.285-07:00The Jews blamed the Nazis for everything, not the ...The Jews blamed the Nazis for everything, not the other way around. You've been brainwashed by Hollywood and the winners who write history:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/search/label/Zionism" rel="nofollow">Zionism/Judaism</a><br /><br />For the Sun questions, when light of any kind shines through a dense medium it appears larger, or rather gives a greater glare, at a given distance than when it is seen through a lighter medium. This is more remarkable when the medium holds aqueous particles or vapor in solution, as in a damp or foggy atmosphere. You can see this by standing within a few yards of a street lamp, and noticing the size of the light; on going away to many times the distance, the light upon the atmosphere will appear considerably larger. This phenomenon may be noticed, to a greater or less degree, at all times; but when the air is moist and vapory it is more intense. It is evident that at sunrise, and at sunset, the sun's light must shine through a greater length of atmospheric air than at mid-day; besides which, the air near the earth is both more dense, and holds more watery particles in solution, than the higher strata through which the sun shines at noonday; and hence the light must be dilated or magnified, as well as modified in color.<br /><br />And for your Moon question, the phases don't work in the spinning ball-Earth model, they do in the flat:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9ZY0dvDLhw" rel="nofollow">Flat Earth Not Fazed by the Moon</a><br /><br /><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2jbpaCszTg" rel="nofollow">Flat Earth and Artist with the Moon</a><br /><br /><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIa5SKLdWj0" rel="nofollow">Flat Earth and the Silver Moon</a>Eric Dubayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11495527904246265068noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-85915920218066877852015-03-25T16:51:23.790-07:002015-03-25T16:51:23.790-07:00Hi Eric, me again. I'm no NASA cult member I h...Hi Eric, me again. I'm no NASA cult member I have an open mind but as I said not so open that my brain falls out, I go where the EVIDENCE takes me and nothing u have said has any correlation in reality.<br /><br />For example you said on a flat earth, due to the law of perspective that's why the sun sets into a vanishing point, which if we follow logic according to you the sun should get smaller and smaller and then should disappear into a point above the horizon. This is quite obviously and empirically demonstrated not to be the case. We can observe the sun's path accross the sky and it stays the same size from sunrise to sunset, and secondly it sets below the horizon which shouldn't happen in your flat earth model! First crack.<br /><br />Secondly you say the moon is not a globe but a disk. This also has no correlation in reality. The phases of the moon i.e crescent, and gibbous moon quite clearly demonstrate the moon to be a globe. If it wasn't a globe a crescent and gibbous moon could not exist! Second crack.<br /><br />Instead of giving us EVIDENCE of your theory you just give us wild speculation and we just need to take your word for it, even though empirical EVIDENCE shows the standard model to correlate with reality.<br /><br />I will admit your theory would be quite seductive to scientifically illiterate people. If only the EVIDENCE supported it. Digging out books hundreds of years old to 'prove' your theory is not evidence when empirical EVIDENCE, real evidence says otherwise.<br /><br />I know u will say I'm brainwashed by NASA, but here's some real empirical EVIDENCE everyone can collect at sunset today. Observe the sun does it get smaller and set above the horizon? Or does it stay the same size and set below the horizon? Your theory has so many holes it's starting to look like swiss cheese.<br /><br />The Nazi's blamed the Jews for all of their problems, and now you are doing a similar thing trying to blame NASA freemasons for all of the world's problems. I will admit freemasons probably are responsible for a lot of things but this conspiracy theory of yours just goes too far. It's always easier to blame someone else or expect someone else to fix our lives than to look inside and realise our true power and potential. Christianity being another example of this. It all comes back to personal responsibility.<br /><br />I look forward to your rebuttal as always Eric. Peace.<br /><br />Jasonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-1064493830880562462015-03-24T21:48:33.237-07:002015-03-24T21:48:33.237-07:00You're an indoctrinated NASA cult-member accus...You're an indoctrinated NASA cult-member accusing me of being a "charismatic cult leader" when you can't even see through Tyson, Sagan, Aldrin, Newton, Copernicus and all the charismatic Freemasonic cult leaders who have brainwashed you! Of course the truth looks like lies when you've been fed nothing but lies and told it was truth your whole life. Again, keep researching Jason. I'm not that charismatic, but I am absolutely right about <a href="http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/search/label/Flat%20Earth" rel="nofollow">the flat, motionless Earth.</a>Eric Dubayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11495527904246265068noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-24345049289676138342015-03-24T21:32:34.005-07:002015-03-24T21:32:34.005-07:00Hi Eric, I must say this debate has really degener...Hi Eric, I must say this debate has really degenerated. Every time I bring up a crack in your theory u keep pointing to the same tired information that dosn't address my concerns.<br /><br />If NASA said the sky was blue would that be wrong because it came from them? This whole specious reasoning thing is becoming a bit ridiculous. Seeing satellites with the naked eye is entirely within the realm of possibility especially just after dusk because of the light object contrasting against the dark sky. Seeing a bus as you say at 300km (low earth orbit) is not a problem when it's illuminated and the background is black.<br /><br />Instead of providing EVIDENCE of why satellites don't exist u show a video of some scientifically illiterate guy 'disproving' the thermosphere, then u say satellites the size of buses can't b seen from 300km because u said so. They are only moving lights and flying craft because u said so. Where's the EVIDENCE? We just have to take your word for it?<br /><br />You remind me of a charismatic cult leader appealing to scientifically illiterate followers. It's as if u had a predetermined conclusion and then had to make the evidence fit to support the conclusion, not the other way as it should be. Very unscientific. U accuse the mainstream of pseudo science the very same thing u r doing!<br /><br />And as always u keep avoiding the central point that your theory revolves around. That a god requires a flat earth and geocentricity. Again what EVIDENCE? We just have to take your word again. Like I said previously I believe in some higher power but the divinity hasn't been beaten out of me just because I believe in a globe earth.<br /><br />Is the idea of a globe earth, heliocentricity, an infinite universe and god co-existing in harmony such a scary thing? I would like you to elaborate with EVIDENCE the necessity of geocentricity for a god to exist.<br /><br />Don't get me wrong Eric I agree there are negative forces steering the world in a certain direction, and I like a lot of your previous work. But u have taken 'conspiracy theory' paranoia to a whole new level and gone down the wrong rabbit hole. I will admit when I first viewed all your material it shook my world for a few days until I realised it didn't hold up to scrutiny.<br /><br />I have an open mind as I'm sure most people in here do but u don't want your mind so open that your brain falls out! Please don't take offence to my comments I don't mean to be offensive I'm in pursuit of truth just as u r. Peace.<br />Jasonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-14917180374714438482015-03-24T04:45:21.641-07:002015-03-24T04:45:21.641-07:00I discussed satellites, you cannot see them with t...I discussed satellites, you cannot see them with the naked eye or a telescope, all you can see are moving lights, flying crafts. You cannot see something smaller than a bus hundreds of miles away. And all information about the thermo"sphere" comes from NASA so arguing temperature is just heresay either way. See the following:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLMRWvXuc5U" rel="nofollow">Satellites Do Not Exist</a><br /><br />Circumnavigation East/West does not involve "constantly turning" but rather constantly going straight with occasional very slight adjustments to stay at right angle to the pole. Keep researching Jason! Peace Eric Dubayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11495527904246265068noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-48931647980355186562015-03-24T03:23:33.043-07:002015-03-24T03:23:33.043-07:00Hi Eric, I know u must b incredibly busy maintaini...Hi Eric, I know u must b incredibly busy maintaining this website and your other interests, but when important questions r asked pointing out cracks in your theories they should b addressed. I know u have invested a lot of time in your book so understandably might not want to enter into dialogue exposing these cracks.<br /><br />Your previous comment said rebuttal but I did not get one. The link did not address my question regarding seeing satellites with the naked eye, circumnavigating a flat earth by plane requiring turning either left or right continually, or the issue of the thermosphere not being able to melt metal.<br /><br />The issue of circumnavigation in a plane on a globe earth according to u requires continually turning down to account for the curve of the earth, so to fix this u replaced the globe earth with a flat earth thinking problem solved, but now u need to either continually turn left or right depending whether going west-east or east-west. So all u have done is swap one problem with another. First crack.<br /><br />You gave no comment or rebuttal on seeing satellites with the naked eye, and the whole thermosphere not melting metal was sufficiently explained by Wikipedia the important issue being heat not temperature! But if u don't come from a scientific background u might not understand the difference between temperature and heat. Another 2 cracks.<br /><br />As for the correlation between god requiring a flat earth, and geocentricity I just don't get it please elaborate more. I guess u could say I believe in the standard globe earth heliocentric theory but I still believe in some kind of god or intelligence. I just don't get the connection u r trying to make. Another crack.<br /><br />Lastly if the universe is infinite then the center should technically b everywhere. I still don't understand how that removes god or makes us any less special!<br /><br />So many points I could make but will leave it there for now. I look forward to your rebuttal as always.<br />Jasonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-89423845324389912102015-03-21T00:14:57.657-07:002015-03-21T00:14:57.657-07:00My rebuttal:
Eric Dubay Real Flat Earther Intervi...My rebuttal:<br /><br /><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G90A2kg1bWs" rel="nofollow">Eric Dubay Real Flat Earther Interview</a>Eric Dubayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11495527904246265068noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-46721812391012429692015-03-18T16:36:48.604-07:002015-03-18T16:36:48.604-07:00Hi Eric, the guy in that satellites don't exis...Hi Eric, the guy in that satellites don't exist video shows such a poor understanding of science. Can I ask what your background in science is?<br /><br />He said if anyone can explain to him how a satellite made of metal with a melting point less than that of the thermosphere (up to 2000 degrees C) won't melt he would listen. Well it explained it pretty well in Wikipedia under the seeming contradiction that he read out. Maybe he doesn't want to listen or understand? Or maybe he didn't even pass junior science?<br /><br />Let's say the temp of the thermosphere was 1 million degrees instead of 2000 it would make hardly any difference when only a few atoms in an almost vacuum are making contact with the satellite. You might get a few hundred atoms on the outside surface melt temporarily until the rest of the satellite absorbed the excess heat. Heat being the key issue here not temp. Very high temp but very little heat. Do u know how big a few hundred atoms are? U can't even see it, water off a ducks back.<br /><br />Again so much of this flat earth conspiracy is based on specious reasoning. It seems to have taken a polarised view of flat earth + geocentric view = god vs globe earth + satellites = no god which has no correlation in reality only faith and a cult like following.<br /><br />I look forward to hearing your rebuttal as always.Jasonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-23192333275529910422015-03-17T01:20:55.002-07:002015-03-17T01:20:55.002-07:00Hi Eric, u said u r open to debate from non believ...Hi Eric, u said u r open to debate from non believers so I hope this comment gets through. I will try and debunk some of your specious reasoning.<br /><br /> If planes circumnavigate the earth plane by going around like on a plate then if going east to west they would have to constantly turn right and if going west to east would have to constantly turn left. This is obviously not the case. <br /><br />Next point about Polaris at the centre of star trails proving the earth is the centre of the universe can also be shown to be bunk. Star trails can only be taken for a maximum of approx 12 hrs while its dark but still give the illusion of stars making a complete revolution because the trails overlap. If the star trails could be captured for a full 24hrs you would see Polaris would not be still in the same spot but had made a small imperfect circle that does not end where it started. This is due to the earth moving less than a degree per 24hrs around the sun. 360 degrees around the sun in 1 year divided by 365 days in a year is slightly less than 1 degree in 1 day. And in 12hrs or less (standard star trail) the earth will move less than 1/2 degree around the sun. This movement is hardly noticeable in a standard star trail giving the illusion that earth is at the center of the universe.<br /><br />Future experiments might try to get a star trail going for 24, 36hrs to see this slight shift between the days therefore disproving geocentric theories.<br /><br />As for satellites don't exist. Wow, can you tell me what I'm seeing orbiting in the sky then? The best time to see so called 'non-existent' satellites is just after the sun has set so the sky is getting dark but the sunlight is still able to illuminate the non-existent satellite. Therefore giving a high contrast between the bright satellite and dark sky.<br /><br />I look forward to hearing your evidence to the contrary.Jasonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-26045182176382593442015-03-09T04:29:40.221-07:002015-03-09T04:29:40.221-07:00So where do the pyramids and their energy fit into...So where do the pyramids and their energy fit into flat earth. Just seen this and anything that NASA says leaves me suspicios. http://survincity.com/2010/10/pyramids-around-the-world-began-to-emit-beams-of/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-39031635663036122732015-03-06T09:02:37.321-08:002015-03-06T09:02:37.321-08:00If you travel in a plane in any direction on the e...<i>If you travel in a plane in any direction on the earth, you will end up at your point of origin.</i><br /><br />No, in 2015 no North / South circumnavigation (or any such "straight line" circumnavigation) has ever been completed. The only way the Earth has been circumnavigated is East / West which are circles, not straight lines.Eric Dubayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11495527904246265068noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-15448633375801977682015-03-06T06:43:18.112-08:002015-03-06T06:43:18.112-08:00Or maybe the earth is round after all. If you trav...Or maybe the earth is round after all. If you travel in a plane in any direction on the earth, you will end up at your point of origin. The earth is round.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08706926425376593438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-52637682085585802692015-03-06T00:00:29.021-08:002015-03-06T00:00:29.021-08:00Yes Steven, ahem "John," that's how ...Yes Steven, ahem "John," that's how books work. I have done years of research, fact-finding and fact-checking before publishing, don't worry about "contrary evidence coming to light," my entire book IS contrary evidence to the fake spinning-ball earth. You still haven't debunked or even mentioned MY Pole Star Conundrum "John." Refute all my points then I'll watch your, erm Steven's video.<br /><br />Anonymous, see the Pole Star comments made previously for a full answer to your question. Due to the law of perspective you cannot see the entirety of the heavens from any one vantage point on Earth.<br /><br />“What can be more common than the observation that, standing at one end of a long row of lamp-posts, those nearest to us seem to be the highest; and those farthest away the lowest; whilst, as we move along towards the opposite end of the series, those which we approach seem to get higher, and those we are leaving behind appear to gradually become lower … It is an ordinary effect of perspective for an object to appear lower and lower as the observer goes farther and farther away from it. Let any one try the experiment of looking at a light-house, church spire, monument, gas lamp, or other elevated object, from a distance of only a few yards, and notice the angle at which it is observed. On going farther away, the angle under which it is seen will diminish, and the object will appear lower and lower as the distance of the observer increases, until, at a certain point, the line of sight to the object, and the apparently uprising surface of the earth upon or over which it stands, will converge to the angle which constitutes the ‘vanishing point’ or the horizon; beyond which it will be invisible.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (230-1)<br /><br />And Michael, yes you are right. East and West are circles, not straight lines. They keep us sailing/flying in circles. If anyone started going in a straight line from wherever on Earth and kept going straight, they would end up in Antarctica and eventually hit the edge/barrier/dome/or continue off into the infinite ice... and perhaps find there are other flat disc worlds along the same plane with their own Sun/Moon/stars encircling etc. Just speculating as that's still a mystery as far as I'm concerned. PeaceEric Dubayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11495527904246265068noreply@blogger.com