tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post9186888605138718997..comments2024-03-07T10:02:32.188-08:00Comments on The Atlantean Conspiracy: The Earth is Not MovingEric Dubayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11495527904246265068noreply@blogger.comBlogger218125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-57643274472867543162020-09-02T13:24:17.580-07:002020-09-02T13:24:17.580-07:00A mind in lockdown is a sad thing to see.
There&#...A mind in lockdown is a sad thing to see.<br /><br />There's more than one kind of WokeTHE CLIMATE WARShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02578106673226403151noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-69959232933205256292018-01-12T11:22:45.825-08:002018-01-12T11:22:45.825-08:00I'm a globe-geocentrist and i think too, that...I'm a globe-geocentrist and i think too, that the distances in the heliocentric system to large. But i cannot response the argument of a heliocentric believer, that the distances to planets were measured by radio waves and the huge distances were therefore prooved.<br /><br />What is to say to this argument?<br /><br />(Excuse my humbling english, i'm a german people)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-53893999304251395142017-12-23T22:39:32.986-08:002017-12-23T22:39:32.986-08:00The earth is static...And the sun revolves around ...The earth is static...And the sun revolves around it!! Here is the proof containing more than 100 objections in light of modern physics and common sense..<br />Grow Up<br /><br />http://www.barkati.net/book/english/Complete_AFairSuccess.pdfAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13790297182786380917noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-49625895172651497762017-09-02T09:34:19.259-07:002017-09-02T09:34:19.259-07:00There must be film or video records of a meteor en...There must be film or video records of a meteor entering the Earth's atmosphere going from East to West, or even just directly towards the Earth, going neither East nor West. In that case, I would expect there to be obvious massive light trails to the East from the supposed 1000-mile/hour travel of the atmosphere from West to East being impacted by an object not traveling in that direction. If the meteor lasts long enough in the atmosphere and it was not going East, I would also expect its trajectory to change (if only slightly) towards the East. Is there any video evidence of such a thing? I ask because I don't know.<br /><br />Or here's another question: how do geo-stationary satellites maintain their orbit over the same point on the Earth's surface, if the Earth is rotating at 24000 miles/hour? Do they have sufficient fuel and engine to propel them for years in that stationary orbit? These are not large Saturn V rockets - so if a small engine and fuel source, whatever that may be, can achieve such speeds, how do I get one of them for my car?<br /><br />Any comments? Thanks!<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14348989435194470894noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-76260444077040084522017-03-10T20:04:13.115-08:002017-03-10T20:04:13.115-08:00I can prove that the Earth is not spinning and hav...I can prove that the Earth is not spinning and have never believed it was anyway. Felix Baumgartner was up 120,000 ft above Earth sitting and waiting to jump and do his freefall. He has video capturing the whole thing which is on Youtube which is clear as anything and guess what? The Earth is not spinning and it never has been.<br /><br /><br />There are countless controlled balloons with cams on them going to the edge of and even out of the atmosphere and clearly shows the earth is NOT SPINNING. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-35748448865894825102017-02-01T15:19:04.038-08:002017-02-01T15:19:04.038-08:00Hi,
how do we read a compass if we complete a circ...Hi,<br />how do we read a compass if we complete a circular tour ? <br />At some point east becomes west does it not ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-92109235220443898132016-07-15T04:34:23.842-07:002016-07-15T04:34:23.842-07:00Hi Eric,
Do you have any articles or interviews ...Hi Eric, <br /><br />Do you have any articles or interviews that focus on the esoteric study of astrology and how it truly "works" in a spiritual sense outside the matrix programmes?<br /><br />Thank You! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-11883851050520759142016-05-15T16:14:36.285-07:002016-05-15T16:14:36.285-07:00Hello, name is Jon. How come earths orbit hasn'...Hello, name is Jon. How come earths orbit hasn't been changed from the billions upon billions of gallons of oil dug from the earth in the last 100 years to then be converted into a gas? Wouldn't that drastically alter orbital trogectory? Id like to note their are 7 billion humans and rising, shouldn't the weight from that also affect earth orbit? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-32895353357164403752016-05-06T12:31:27.399-07:002016-05-06T12:31:27.399-07:00All heliocentric arguments seem to forget one thin...All heliocentric arguments seem to forget one thing <b>MOMENTUM!</b> <br /><br />For the "A plane going East to West would have to be flying faster than one going West to East" argument: Imagine this. If I am on a train going at 80 mph and I get up out of my seat, do I suddenly fly to the back of the train at 80 mph and crash into the wall? No! Of course not! Because of momentum, my walking speed gets added to the trains speed - it doesn't just magically stop the train moving!<br /><br />For the "The atmosphere would have been long-since stripped off" argument: Again, momentum! The atmosphere is moving with the Earth and so is going at the same rate. Any fluctuations in this rate are comparatively small and the Earth's gravitational field will keep the atmosphere in place.<br /><br />Now, I want to ask you a question. Has there ever been a peer-approved scientifically valid paper that said geocentricity is right? No! Has there ever been a peer-approved scientifically valid paper that said heliocentricity is right? Yes! Multiple times. The famous 'WOW' signal was actually a pulsar millions of light-years away. While the scientists were trying to find out where this signal came from, they looked at an effect called the Doppler Effect*. If the radio waves coming back from the source were blue-shifted or red-shifted, that means the source was either moving away from us, or moving towards us. They found that the signal was red-shifted, but it was getting less so over the next few weeks and eventually started getting blue-shifted. They calculated this cycle would repeat once every year exactly. They failed to prove the source was moving, but instead managed to prove the Earth went round the Sun in a year.<br /><br />So there you go. Disprove me successfully and I will be very impressed.<br /><br />*<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doppler_effect" rel="nofollow">The Wikipedia page on the Doppler Effect, if you want to have a read</a>Simonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10072012991501886931noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-5085228041363153272016-04-24T19:05:37.946-07:002016-04-24T19:05:37.946-07:00Hello Eric, Thanks for your blog, website and vide...Hello Eric, Thanks for your blog, website and videos. They are most interesting and provide much food for thought.<br /><br />I have been investigating many things but whether the earth is flat is not really one of them just yet but at some point definately will.<br /><br />I do think that you do put a lot of emphasis on the premise that if earth is flat then this implies some intelligence has createdit and us but it could be reasoned that if the earth is a globe of sorts its creation could also be the result of some intelligence.<br />For instance, it occurs to me that the scientific observation that all matter moves towards a state of entropy is supposeldly universal whereas life itself moves in the opposite direction from a state disorder to a state of order at least for the lifespan of the organism. It would imply that life itself is not random by any means by very specific and dependant on energy/force, intelligence and conditions to take place.<br />The form in which intelligence is present also does not have to conform to the types that we are able to observe, theorise about or even comprehend since the abstraction of that which we do not know about far outweights that which we do know about and it could be that our position is to decrease that gap of knowledge.<br /><br />It is clear that the information that we are programmed with has been divined to restrict our thoughts and movements and to stunt our capacity to discriminate and freely question. We are set about by multiple falsehoods daily that direct us and preach the false morality of the state. <br />Most are not aware that morality is borne out of the rationalisation of life itself and by extension each individual is his her own highest authority.<br /><br />I'd like to thank you for sharing your information hope to also have something worthwhile to contribute.<br /><br />Regards<br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-13287065224854766392016-03-23T10:51:09.394-07:002016-03-23T10:51:09.394-07:00Hello: My name is Mark. I have recently, in the ...Hello: My name is Mark. I have recently, in the past few years been introduced to the idea of geocentricity and find it fascinating and more in line with that which I find written in the Holy Bible - which I am fully persuaded not to be the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which effectually worketh in those who believe (1 Thessalonians 2:13). <br /><br />Today, for whatever reason, I wanted to see what I could find in the geocentric community as pertains to an explanation for the rotation of the stars as observed through time lapse photography. Basically, comes down to the earth rotating or the stars are rotating.<br /><br />In my searching, I've come across a lot of strange stuff. But, I want to give serious consideration to anything that is truly plausible. Anyway, one of the arguments I have come across is that if the earth is rotating, the surface velocity is thus and thus and that it would change depending on where you were on the surface relative to equator and the poles. This makes physical sense and I think there is something to be said with this argument. However, the logic I've seen used in this argument falls short with me. <br /><br />The most common argument I've seen thus far is something like this; a projectile shot from a spring gun on a rapid moving train will travel farther depending on whether or not it was shot to the front or to the back of the train because it is being shot from a moving train. Relative to the ground, the distance traveled by the projectile is indeed different. But, is the distance traveled different when measured relative to the train? Will the projectile not fall the same distance from where it was shot relative to the train regardless of shooting toward the front or the back? Unfortunately, this argument is used to say that when on the equator, the distance traveled should be different depending on shooting east or west. But, this is a flawed argument because in this argument, the train would represent the earth. That is, whether or not the earth is rotating, any projectile shot east or west while on the equator is still starting from a given position relative to the earth (moving or stationary) and will travel the same distance relative to the earth whether shot east or west because it is acted upon by the same force starting from the same position. That is, without a fixed external reference point in space, it's not possible to prove how far the projectile actually traveled in space. <br /><br />In my opinion, this argument regarding the changing surface velocity would be better used with regard to shooting a projectile from the north or south pole toward the equator on a line of constant longitude would behave. If the earth is rotating, the surface velocity under the projectile would increase perpendicular to the line of the shot as stated and it would thus presumably be impossible to shoot a projectile along a straight line of longtitude because the surface velocity is changing while the project is presumably not being acted upon by any other force. Would it not make sense to go down this route as far as this argument is concerned? I'm pretty sure that it is possible to shoot a projectile from one of the poles on a straight line of longitude toward the equator. Perhaps if I search more, I'll find such an argument.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-28952522042508275222016-02-27T21:02:58.866-08:002016-02-27T21:02:58.866-08:00So if the space shuttle leaves earth going into sp...So if the space shuttle leaves earth going into space and the earth is spinning 1000 miles per hour, then how does it find its way back in? Timing would have to be pretty precise 🤓Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-2001525319485926212016-02-11T20:43:01.566-08:002016-02-11T20:43:01.566-08:00Here is the proof written by A'la Hadhrat Imam...Here is the proof written by A'la Hadhrat Imam Ahmed Raza bareilly. <br /><br />https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01BJR5MCIEJAZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09026836173467162738noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-84800164204328438452015-12-29T01:04:53.263-08:002015-12-29T01:04:53.263-08:00The earth is absolutely at the center of the unive...The earth is absolutely at the center of the universe, and it is also not. The reason we can't jump up and wait for the earth to spin to arrive at a new location is the same reason you can't do that on a train moving at a constant speed. However if the earth or train were to accelerate while we're in the air then certainly we would see relative motion. It all relative. From our perspective (the only one that matters) we are at the center of the Universe. The theory of relativity holds and unless you can prove that there is a firmament or either this is all moot.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-65219469879852789042015-12-17T12:30:12.856-08:002015-12-17T12:30:12.856-08:00The Foucault Pendulum does not prove the earth mov...The Foucault Pendulum does not prove the earth moves. Those who hang onto this rubbish as a last resort to prove their shattered globe programming need to use their minds and eyes and wake up from the delusion. The reason why the BS (Bad Science) pendulum does not prove the earth moves is: 1. it has to be manually started and 2. it stops 3. the only reason it rotates is because of either a magnetic anomaly or the circuit of the sun and moon and stars. The coriolis non-effect has never been proven except in the theoretical labs of harlot scientists who sold their souls for a bit of cash and fame that at the end of the day will prove their pride and stubbornness a stumbling block to them!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-87921035123761354272015-12-15T18:52:32.091-08:002015-12-15T18:52:32.091-08:00Hi Eric, nice site, although only read the Earth n...Hi Eric, nice site, although only read the Earth not moving posts...do you read the comments?<br /><br />What would you suppose of the three 'invisible planets'? I would suspect another conspiracy by the Church...<br /><br />You have reference to numerology, so you will easily follow.<br />Uranus, discovered 13 March 1781 - numerologically 6<br />Neptune, discovered 23 September (Equinox) 1846 - numerologically 6<br />Pluto, discovered 18 February 1930 - numerologically 6<br /><br />At roughly the same time of their discuoveries, we have oil (O), electricity (E) and nuclear (N) - ONE<br /><br />The 666 references are within the New Testament which we know is allegory, not literal, but those who make it literal are exposing something?<br /><br />On 25 January 2017, Uranus will have revolved around the Zodiac over two times (times), Neptune will have revolved over 1 time (time) and Pluto will have revolved exactly on that date, half a time around the zodiac (half a time)...time, times and half a time is also a very significant statement in what the Church has told us is "end times" Bible allegories...<br /><br />I ask you to meditate on that...I have, and I know what I see....<br /><br />BTW - Wil be in Thailand in May next year, love to meet you....<br />So, where we heading with all this in THEIR minds...what they have planned?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05611181010956974792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-69593270607152847322015-11-07T04:32:33.107-08:002015-11-07T04:32:33.107-08:00Hello all, very interesting comments made by both ...Hello all, very interesting comments made by both sides of the debate.. my question is a simple one ..has nasa produced any video evidence of the earth spinning at 1000 mph in real time?.. and can any verify without referring to scientific evidence / papers how they measured that the earth is spinning at any given speed<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-60222345509128082692015-05-25T13:50:33.356-07:002015-05-25T13:50:33.356-07:00@Anonymous
The pendulum rotates as the celestial b...@Anonymous<br />The pendulum rotates as the celestial bodies (and their aether) rotates daily around the Earth.<br />And during eclipses the pendulum rotates faster!! Which is called the unexplained Allais Effect. So the pendulum movement was a result of some movement "up there" not "down here".<br />-----<br />The ISS moves around the earth! Of course it'll look like the ground moves beneath it.. like watching earth from a plane window, or watching the road from a moving train!<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WN0oOarM1AQSalamahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01410040900656015293noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-37503195735733244362015-05-23T18:20:44.803-07:002015-05-23T18:20:44.803-07:00Explain this one away then. How do you explain th...Explain this one away then. How do you explain the pattern that the pendulum traces, if the earth is'nt rotating. <br /><br />http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2010/09/17/but-it-moves-how-we-know-the-e/<br /><br /><br />Also.. what about all the space station footage of the earth rotating. Is that presumably fake?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-12560032849980597772015-05-17T22:56:11.045-07:002015-05-17T22:56:11.045-07:00Hello: Don here. Just read your entire blog post h...Hello: Don here. Just read your entire blog post here and would like to point out that the October 23, 2013 post with the link to the video "Earth Form Space - Clearly The Earth Doesn't Move" that the cloud cover does change from the first day to the second day. Take a screen capture of the full earth on the first day then another one on the second day, and you can clearly see that the cloud cover in the northern hemisphere has changed from one day to the next. Same thing in the lower right side. Also, when the transition to night occurs, there are two stars visible on the right side of the earth that do not move. Just thought I'd share that.<br /><br />Also, I looked at one of the links regarding the fake moon landings. The moon landing fakes seem more than plausible, especially since the new scientific community is trying to figure out how to shield the next manned missions from radiation (thought they figured that out in the 60's - LOL). However, I take exception to saying that satellites are myths. If so, how do you account for the video linked above, that fact the directTV and Dish Network satellite receivers must be precisely pointed to the sky to get a signal, google earth and the GPS satellite constellations used for precision navigation -- these are not land-based - they are physical working satellites in orbit. Same goes for the international space station -- you can see it on a clear night with a telescope -- its up there orbiting the earth. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-49232242207237728072015-05-12T18:34:34.541-07:002015-05-12T18:34:34.541-07:00Great book!!
What is the easiest way to explain t...Great book!!<br /><br />What is the easiest way to explain the orbital pattern of Mars with a geocentric model? They claim we are orbiting faster than mars? Confusing!Eddynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-27681486768988536382015-05-07T07:49:12.726-07:002015-05-07T07:49:12.726-07:00The ball drop thing only applies to a closed vehic...The ball drop thing only applies to a closed vehicle. Try to do this in a convertible with opened roof. You have to adjust the angle of the ball thrown up in the air to make sure, it lands back in the car and not on the street behind you. And it´s not only the airstream. So, not feeling the earth moving IS a point, that suggests earth and atmosphere exist in a closed environment. Which means there is a "hull" or "shield" or something around the earth? Then the plane/flighttime/atmosphere moving with earth- scenario makes sense. And don´t tell me the vacuum of outer space is the "hull"?!Maybe there is a "ceiling" if you just fly high enough. And if this way up ceiling has the stars and moon and sun attached on the inner side...oh, wait...there we go again. But actually, who knows? Remember the ending of the first Men in Black, where the alien collects it´s marbles and one of it is us?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-78472142831244263562015-04-18T08:06:08.423-07:002015-04-18T08:06:08.423-07:00Please do research. If two people stand on the sur...Please do research. If two people stand on the surface of the earth and shoot at each other at the same time, they both get hit at the same time (assuming same gun, bullet). This is true even though the earth is whipping through space at a zillion miles per hour.<br />What you are investigating here is relative velocity. If you stand at the front of a train that's moving fast and you shoot a bullet perpendicular to the train, the bullet will stay in line with the barrel of the gun as it flies away from the train. From a stationary observer above, the path of the gun and the path of the bullet will make a V.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-59279654538394484532015-04-18T08:02:20.590-07:002015-04-18T08:02:20.590-07:00OMG, the person who said ,"Some of you dont g...OMG, the person who said ,"Some of you dont get it," and then proceeded to explain Air Dynamics using his Gun story is quite wrong. If youre in a train, and you stand at the front of the train, and fired it to the back, and then stand at the back and fire the gun to the front, it will take the EXACT same time for the Bullet to hit the front and the back. The speed of the train is NEGLIGENT relative to the Gun being fired INSIDE the train, BECAUSE everything is moving at the exact same speed. The speed of the train compared to the speed of the bullet only becomes influential when the Gun is fired OUTSIDE The train. Inside the train, it has no effect. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6187812747707644707.post-38930728483886254392015-04-18T07:51:52.188-07:002015-04-18T07:51:52.188-07:00"Every experiment ever designed to detect the..."Every experiment ever designed to detect the motion of the earth has failed to detect earth's motion and/or distinguish it from relative counter motion of the universe." - --> Youre already assuming that the Earth doesnt spin WITH the rest of the Universe, rather that the rest of the Universe spins with a motion counter relative to the Earth. You need to PROVE this before making such an assumption. At least come up with a theory. Whether the Earth is flat, round, moving, or stationary, has no bearing on the rest of the Universe's motion relative to the Earth being in motion. Under this assumption, any experiment to detect the Earths motion would immediately be untrue, because you would immediately attribute it to the rest of the universe acting on Earth. Focaults Pendulum wouldnt move unless the Earth is spinning. The Heavens wouldnt put any noticeable force on the Pendulum itself. Gravity? Flat Earthers argue against Gravity? Inertia. You all argue against Inertia as well. You cant argue against Gravity and Inertia and then use it when its convenient. You say theres a force outside Earth that would act on the Pendulum? WHAT IMAGINARY FORCE are you talking about? No. Obviously the only logical answer is that the Earth is spinning.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com