Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Ape-Men Never Existed!

One of the first frauds in the history of Darwinism, known as “recapitulation theory,” and heralded as undeniable “proof of evolution,” was an idea proposed and propagated by a racist eugenicist Professor named Ernst Haeckel in the late 19th century.  A contemporary and friend of Charles Darwin and Thomas “Bulldog” Huxley, Haeckel postulated that human (and other animal) embryos experience a miniature form of the entire evolutionary impulse during their development in the womb, displaying first characteristics of fish, then reptile, and lastly mammalian or human.  It has long been eliminated from scientific literature, but many people and popular sources still unknowingly quote and believe in Haeckel’s fraudulent work.  Several popular magazines and school textbooks as recently as the 1990s, over a century after being exposed, were still publishing Haeckel’s hoaxed pictures and recapitulation theory as science fact!

It has since been proven that this theory is completely bogus.  It is now known that the ‘gills’ that supposedly appear in the early stages of the human embryo are in fact the initial phases of the middle-ear canal, parathyroid, and thymus.  The part of the embryo that was likened to the ‘egg yolk pouch’ turns out to be a pouch that produces blood for the infant.  The part that had been identified as a ‘tail’ by Haeckel and his followers is in fact the backbone, which resembles a tail only because it takes shape before the legs do.  Another interesting aspect of ‘recapitulation’ was Ernst Haeckel himself, a faker who falsified his drawings in order to support the theory he advanced.  Haeckel’s forgeries purported to show that fish and human embryos resembled one another.  When he was caught out, the only defense he offered was that other evolutionists had committed similar offences!  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (199-200)

Haeckel was charged with fraud by five professors and convicted by a university court at Jena where he admitted that several of his drawings were forgeries, that he was merely filling in missing links where evidence was thin, and that hundreds of his contemporaries were guilty of the same charge!  During the trial he said; “After this compromising confession of forgery I should be obliged to consider myself condemned and annihilated if I had not the consolation of seeing side by side with me in the prisoners’ dock hundreds of fellow culprits, among them many of the most trusted observers and most esteemed biologists.  The great majority of all the diagrams in the best biological textbooks, treatises and journals would incur in the same degree the charge of forgery, for all of them are inexact, and are more or less doctored, schematized and constructed.

What an admission!  Not only did Haeckel confess his own forgeries, but he admitted that there were hundreds of other scientific fraudsters similarly doctoring findings in the best biological textbooks, treatises and journals (several of which will be examined in this chapter).  As it turns out, Haeckel had simply copied and printed the same human embryo pictures several times over claiming each were various other animal embryos with exact parallels, when in fact the parallels do not exist, and the pictures were copies he knowingly and intentionally made to suit his recapitulation idea. 

To support his theory, Haeckel, whose knowledge of embryology was self-taught, faked some of his evidence.  He not only altered his illustrations of embryos but also printed the same plate of an embryo three times, and labeled one a human, the second a dog and the third a rabbit ‘to show their similarity.’”  -Malcolm Bowden, “Ape-Men: Fact or Fallacy?”

This is one of the worst cases of scientific fraud.  It’s shocking to find that somebody one thought was a great scientist was deliberately misleading.  It makes me angry … What Haeckel did was to take a human embryo and copy it, pretending that the salamander and the pig and all the others looked the same at the same stage of development.  They don’t … These are fakes.”  -Dr. Michael Richardson, The Times London, Aug. 11, 1997

For the past 150 years, evolutionist scientists have been working diligently to propagandize the public into believing that modern humans are descended from ancient apes.  The final and most difficult theoretical leap for the theory of evolution is this supposed million-year transition from ape to human.  The utter impossibility of “evolving” abilities like bipedality, erect spinal columns, and complex linguistic skills has been debated since the theory was first presented, but such obstacles will never stop die-hard evolutionists set on discovering (or inventing!) a believable monkey-man transitional species.

The first of these convenient evolutionary “discoveries” was the “Neanderthal Man” found in the Neander Valley of Germany in 1856, just in time for the release of Darwin’s Origin of Species.  To this day, reconstructed drawings of hairy ape-like “Neanderthal” men are depicted in scholarly journals and school textbooks and claimed to be a missing evolutionary link.  The fact is, however, that all so-called Neanderthal remains have never been shown to be any more different from modern humans than an Asian from a Caucasian, or an Inuit from an Aborigine.  Also the skull size shows its brain was actually 13% larger than the average brain of modern man, making it impossible to be an intermediary between man and ape.  Even Time magazine in 1971 proclaimed the primitiveness of Neanderthal to be unwarranted, that he could walk the street today unrecognized, one writer even commenting that historians of the future may “declare us all insane for not detecting and refuting this incredible blunder with adequate determination.”

One of the main proponents pushing Neanderthal Man as an authentic species nowadays is Reiner Protsch, a German professor who dated the fossils at 36,000 years old allowing them to fit perfectly in the evolutionist’s timeline.  In 2005, however, Protsch was forced to retire in disgrace by a panel of Frankfurt University heads who determined he had “fabricated data and plagiarized the work of his colleagues over the past 30 years.”  The once-renowned “carbon-dating expert” has presently been completely ostracized from the scientific community.  It has since been determined that all Neanderthal skeletal remains are no more than a few thousand years old, some only a few hundred!  They have also found modern human DNA in the bones, that their brain capacity was 13% larger than the modern average, their height 5’9” comparable to our average, and they had advanced tools, buried their dead and enjoyed art!

University of Berlin Professor Rudolf Virchow, Ernst Haeckel’s former professor and the “father of modern pathology” back in 1872 concluded the original “Neanderthal” remains were simply that of an unfortunate homo sapiens who had suffered childhood rickets, adult arthritis, and was victim to several damaging blows to the head.  Erik Trinkaus, a paleoanthropologist from New Mexico University concluded his examination stating, “Detailed comparisons of Neanderthal skeletal remains with those of modern humans have shown that there is nothing in Neanderthal anatomy that conclusively indicates locomotor, manipulative, intellectual, or linguistic abilities inferior to those of modern humans.”

In 1891-92, the next ape-man “discovery” was found in Java, Indonesia by Eugene Dubois, who “coincidentally” happened to be a student and apprentice of evolutionist hoaxster Ernst Haeckel!  Dubois found a skullcap, a leg bone, a jaw fragment and three teeth, from which was reconstructed the ape-like “Java Man.”  Within 10 years of its discovery, Java Man was the main subject of over 80 evolution books and articles.  It was given the “scientific name,” of “Anthropopithecus erectus,” and later changed to “Pithecanthropus erectus” and finally “Homo erectus” undoubtedly for super-official pseudo-scientific reasons.

Java man was discovered by a Dutchman.  I’m a little embarrassed by that because I’m a Dutchman myself.  His name was Eugene Dubois.  The bones were found in 1891-92 on the Indonesian Island of Java in Southeast Asia along the banks of the Solo River.  And there was an interesting assortment.  He found a leg bone, a skullcap, a jaw fragment and three teeth.  And that’s what he concocted Java man from.  Interestingly enough some of the teeth were old and some young.  The bones belonged to ape, female and male.  It was an interesting conglomeration and the reason that people didn’t catch on to it is because the find of Dubois was kept from scholars for about 30 years.  He also withheld the discovery of modern human remains, which were found in the same stratum as Java man.  Of course, that would have ruined his claims that Java man was the ancestor of modern day humans.  Finally, enough pressure was placed on him that the actual bones were allowed to be examined and the discrepancies were found.  And eventually, enlightened America as well as the world found out that this was a hoax.  Unfortuantely hoaxes die hard. [Recently] Time Magazine ran a cover story entitled “How Man Became Man” and starts off ridiculing Christians and Creationists then goes on to present Java man as though it were fact.”  -Hank Hanegraaff, “The Face that Demonstrates the Farce of Evolution”

“Java Man’s” teeth were found to be of different ages and the bones a mixture of human and ape, with a giant gibbon skull!  Rudolph Virchow, Haeckel’s own professor and the foremost pathology expert of his time stated, “In my opinion this creature was an animal, a giant gibbon, in fact.  And the thigh bone has not the slightest connection with the skull.”  He and many others have concluded the thigh bone is quite clearly human while the skullcap and teeth belonged to a primate.

In 1912 a doctor and paleo-anthropologist named Charles Dawson claimed to have found a jawbone and cranial fragment of an ape-man transitional form in a pit in Piltdown, England.  It was alleged to be 500,000 years old and was displayed as absolute proof of human evolution in museums across the world.  For the next 40 years, scores of “scientific” articles, artist reconstructions, and over 500 doctoral theses were written about “Piltdown man.”  Objections and criticisms were raised immediately by contemporaries like Arthur Keith but managed to be mitigated by Dawson until 1953 when tests proved conclusively that the Piltdown skull was actually human and only a few hundred years old, while the lower protruding jaw was from a recently deceased orangutan!

Investigators found that Dawson had artificially worn down the orangutan jaw, and that the “primitive tools” discovered alongside the fossils were imitations Dawson had sharpened with steel implements!  Dawson also filled the molar surfaces of the teeth to more resemble those of man, and stained all the fossils with potassium dichromate to give them an antiquated appearance.  The stains quickly disappeared when dipped in acid however.  Wilfred Le Gros Clark, a member of Joseph Weiner’s team who uncovered the forgery, stated that, “the evidences of artificial abrasion immediately sprang to the eye.  Indeed so obvious did they seem it may well be asked, how was it that they had escaped notice before?  Within days, Piltdown man was removed from the British Museum where it had been on display for four decades. 

Since conclusively being proven a hoax in 1953 many of Dawson’s other paleontological “finds” have also proven to be fakes or planted.  In 2003, Dr. Miles Russell of Bournemouth University published the results of an investigation into Dawson’s antiquarian collection concluding that at least 38 specimens were clear fakes, noting that “Dawson’s entire academic career appears to have been built upon deceit, sleight of hand, fraud and deception, the ultimate gain being international recognition.”

The next fraudulent attempt at creating and propagating a supposed ape-man transitional form was carried out in 1922 by Henry Fairfield Osborn.  Co-founder of the American Eugenics Society, President of the White Supremacist Pioneer Fund and director of the American Museum of Natural History, Osborn declared that he had been sent an anomalous tooth found in Snake Brook, Nebraska, which had characteristics of both ape and man!  He determined that it came from the Pliocene period of ancient history, from the transitional species “Pithecanthropus erectus,” and affectionately labeled the tooth’s owner “Nebraska Man.”

Nebraska man was also immediately given a ‘scientific name,’ Hesperopithecus haroldcooki.  Many authorities gave Osborn their support.  Based on this single tooth, reconstructions of the Nebraska man’s head and body were drawn.  Moreover, Nebraska man was even pictured along with his wife and children, as a whole family in a natural setting.  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (95)

Once “Nebraska Man” made the media rounds of popular publications and the pliable public was sufficiently propagandized, the story disappeared until 1928 when William Bryan and William Gregory had the opportunity to independently examine the tooth.  Their investigations both conclusively found that the tooth did not belong to a man or ape, but was actually from an extinct species of wild American pig called Presthennops!  After William Gregory published his article, “Hesperopithecus: Apparently Not an Ape Nor a Man,” in Science magazine all drawings and models of “Nebraska Man” and his “family” were quickly removed from evolutionist publications.

Henry Osborn himself was forced to concede that Nebraska Man, “Hesperopithecus haroldcooki,” the supposed example of the “Pliocene Pithecanthropus erectus” and his whole imaginary family were completely fictional fabrications.  He never admitted to intentional fraud (and why would he?), but as an ardent evolutionist, eugenicist and white supremacist, a level of confirmation bias was likely.  Osborn was even such a sadistic racist that he was quoted during a national debate unabashedly saying of WWI Army intelligence tests that; “I believe those tests were worth what the war cost, even in human life … We have learned once and for all that the Negro is not like us.

After Darwin advanced the claim with his book The Descent of Man that man evolved from ape-like living beings, he started to seek fossils to support this contention.  However, some evolutionists believed that ‘half-man half-ape’ creatures were to be found not only in the fossil record, but also alive in various parts of the world.  In the early 20th century, these pursuits for ‘living transitional links’ led to unfortunate incidents, one of the cruelest of which is the story of a Pygmy by the name of Ota Benga.  Ota Benga was captured in 1904 by an evolutionist researcher in the Congo.  In his own tongue, his name meant ‘friend.’ He had a wife and two children.  Chained and caged like an animal, he was taken to the USA where evolutionist scientists displayed him to the public in the St. Louis World Fair along with other ape species and introduced him as ‘the closest transitional link to man.’  Two years later they took him to the Bronx Zoo in New York and there they exhibited him under the denomination of ‘ancient ancestors of man’ along with a few chimpanzee, a gorilla named Dinah, and an orangutan called Dohung.  Dr. William Hornaday, the zoo’s evolutionist director gave long speeches on how proud he was to have this exceptional ‘transitional form’ in his zoo and treated caged Ota Benga as if he were an ordinary animal.  Unable to bear the treatment he was subjected to, Ota Benga eventually committed suicide.  Piltdown Man, Nebraska Man, Ota Benga… These scandals demonstrate that evolutionist scientists do not hesitate to employ any kind of unscientific method to prove their theories.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (96-97)

In 1927 Davidson Black declared he had discovered five crushed skulls and several teeth near Beijing belonging to an ancient ape-man species now widely known as “Peking Man.”  Somewhere between 1941-1945 all the original bones were mysteriously “lost,” however, leaving only a few plaster casts left to examine!  At the same site where this supposed “missing link” was found, there were also found the remains of 10 fully human skeletons who quarried nearby limestone, built fires and left behind a variety of tools.  Many scientists now believe the tools were used on the Peking Man rather than by them.  The back of the skulls were all bashed in and in that part of the world, monkey brains are a delicacy, so it is likely that Peking Man were actually Peking apes, and they were man’s meal, not man’s ancient ancestor.

In 1974 Donald Johansson discovered “Lucy” a three-foot tall supposedly three-million year-old “Australopithicine” in Ethiopia.  Widely publicized as our oldest direct human ancestor, Lucy made the usual rounds of scientific magazine journals and school textbooks.  Don Johansson modestly claimed that Lucy was “the most important find made by anyone in the history of the entire human race,” and the media heralded him a hero.  He was promoted from assistant professor to receiving his own Institute for Human Biology at Berkley.  During all this time he never allowed scientists to examine Lucy’s bones until 1982, eight years later.   Since then, and as more “Australopithecine” skeletons have been found and examined, however, many leading evolutionists agree that Lucy is simply an extinct type of ape, similar to modern pygmy chimpanzees and nothing more.  They may have walked slightly more upright than most apes, but were not bipedal or erect, could not talk, spent most time in trees, and walked on all fours. 

Lord Solly Zuckerman and Professor Charles Oxnard did 15 years of research on Australopithecines along with a team of five specialists coming to the conclusion that all the various specimens of Australopithecus they examined were only an ordinary ape genus and definitely not bipedal.  The French Science and Life magazine ran the cover story in May 1999 “Goodbye Lucy” writing about how “Lucy” the most famous fossil of Australopithecus was not the root of the human race and needs to be removed from our supposed family tree.  However, even now in 2014 a movie named “Lucy” has just been released by Masonic “Universal Pictures” where the Lucy ape-woman fraud is still treated as scientific fact throughout the entire movie.

In 1982 a skull fragment found in the Spanish town of Orce was hailed to be the oldest fossilized human remain ever found in Eurasia!  “Orce man” was supposedly a 17 year old ape-man who lived between 900,000 - 1,600,000 years ago, and was presented to the world with the usual reconstructed drawings showing a young, hairy man-ape teenager.  In 1983, however, a team of scientists from France concluded that the skull fragment was actually from a four-month old donkey!   A three-day scientific symposium had been scheduled so experts could examine and discuss the bone, but was immediately cancelled after the French investigation; embarrassed Spanish officials sent out 500 letters to the would-be attendees apologizing.  After more conclusive tests The Daily Telegraph on May 14, 1984 carried the headline “Ass Taken For Man.”

Later in 1984, Kemoya Kimeu in a team led by paleoanthropologist Richard Leakey, discovered “Turkana Boy,” at Nariokotome near Lake Turkana, Kenya.  Turkana Boy was proclaimed to be a pre-teen boy from 1.5-1.6 million years ago and is now regarded as the most complete early human skeleton ever found.  Much like Neanderthal Man, however, Turkana Boy or “Narikotome Homo erectus,” is no different from modern man.  American paleoanthropologist Alan Walker said, “I doubt the average pathologist could tell the difference between the fossil skeleton and that of a modern human.”  He wrote that he laughed upon first seeing it because “it looked so much like a Neanderthal.”

Turkana Boy was bipedal, with arms and legs of human proportions, an upright skeletal structure, comparable in height, cranial size, and development rate of modern humans.  Even the discovering team-leader Richard Leakey stated that the difference between this specimen of “Homo erectus” and modern man are no more pronounced than simple racial variances: “The shape of the skull, the degree of protrusion of the face, the robustness of the brows and so on… These differences are probably no more pronounced than we see today between the separate geographical races of modern humans.  Such biological variation arises when populations are geographically separated from each other for significant lengths of time.”

So, when seen for what they really are, all the supposed ape-men discoveries and reconstructions are nothing but frauds and fantasies.  Neanderthal Man was just an ordinary man, Java Man and Piltdown Man were composed of human and ape bones, Nebraska Man was actually a pig, Peking Man was actually a man’s meal, Lucy was just a monkey, Orce Man was a donkey, and Turkana Boy was just a boy!

Reconstruction can be explained as drawing a picture or constructing a model of a living thing based on a single bone - sometimes only a fragment - that has been unearthed.  The ‘ape-men’ we see in newspapers, magazines, or films are all reconstructions.  The fossils that are claimed to be evidence for the human evolution scenario are in fact products of fraud.  For more than 150 years, not even a single fossil to prove evolution has been found.  As a matter of fact, the reconstructions (drawings or models) of the fossil remains made by the evolutionists are prepared speculatively precisely to validate the evolutionary thesis.  David R. Pilbeam, an anthropologist from Harvard, stresses this fact when he says: ‘At least in paleoanthropology, data are still so sparse that theory heavily influences interpretations.  Theories have, in the past, clearly reflected our current ideologies instead of the actual data.’ Since people are highly effected by visual information, these reconstructions best serve the purpose of evolutionists, which is to convince people that these reconstructed creatures really existed in the past.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (90)

All the many models, drawings, cartoons, mannequins, and movies made involving various “ape-men” are complete fiction and fabrication because no one can actually accurately determine the outward appearance of an animal based solely on bone structure.  Soft tissue, which vanishes quickly after death and is responsible for the look of one’s eyes, ears, nose, lips, hair, eyebrows, skin etc., totally depends on the imagination of the person reconstructing them.  Earnest A. Hooten of Harvard University stated, “To attempt to restore the soft parts is an even more hazardous undertaking.  The lips, the eyes, the ears, and the nasal tip leave no clues on the underlying bony parts.  You can with equal facility model on a Neanderthaloid skull the features of a chimpanzee or the lineaments of a philosopher.  These alleged restorations of ancient types of man have very little if any scientific value and are likely only to mislead the public… So put not your trust in reconstructions.”

There is no concrete fossil evidence to support the ‘ape-man’ image, which is unceasingly promulgated by the media and evolutionist academic circles.  With brushes in their hands, evolutionists produce imaginary creatures, nevertheless, the fact that these drawings correspond to no matching fossils constitutes a serious problem for them.  One of the interesting methods they employ to overcome this problem is to ‘produce’ the fossils they cannot find.  Piltdown Man, which may be the biggest scandal in the history of science, is a typical example of this method.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (93) 

The current evolutionist ape-to-human transitional theory goes “Australophithecus,” - “Homo habilis,” - “Homo erectus” - “Homo sapiens.”  Australophithecus, which means “Southern Ape,” has been proven to be nothing but an extinct ape which closely resembles many modern chimpanzees in height, arm and leg length, skull shape, teeth, mandibular structure, and many other details.  Homo habilis, a hypothetical classification created in the 1960s by Turkana Boy team-leader Richard Leakey was what evolutionists deemed necessary to exist between Australophithecus and Homo erectus, because the jump was far too drastic.  There needed to be a species of ape-man with a larger cranial capacity that could walk upright and use tools.

Serendipitously for his career, fossils unearthed in the late 1980s were deemed Homo habilis, and Leakey was regarded a scientific genius!  That is until his contemporaries Bernard Wood and C. Loring Brace determined the Homo habilis arms were too long, legs were too short, and skeletal structure too ape-like to be anything but an ape.  Their fingers and toes were that of tree-climbers, and their jaws and cranial capacities were comparable to modern apes.  American anthropologist Holly Smith in 1994 concluded Homo habilis was not Homo, or human, at all, but simply an ape just like Australopithecus.  She stated that, “Restricting analysis of fossils to specimens satisfying these criteria, patterns of dental development of gracile australopithecines and Homo habilis remain classified with African apes.  Those of Homo erectus and Neanderthals are classified with humans.

So Australopithecus and Homo habilis, the first two classifications, are both actually fully ape, while Homo erectus and Homo sapiens, the second two classifications, are in fact fully human and comparable to modern man, with variances no greater than the natural variances of race and genetics.  So even after 150 years of “discoveries” evolutionists are no closer to finding a true “transitional species” existing between ape and man, and no closer to proving their theory.  Nor can they answer, how could apes develop bipedality, human arm/leg length ratios, erect spinal columns and complex linguistic skills?  If humans evolved from apes, why do apes still exist?  Why don’t any of these supposed transitional forms still exist now, and where are true examples in the fossil record?

The evolutionists wrote the scenario of human evolution by arranging some of the ape skulls that suited their purpose in an order from the smallest to the biggest and scattering the skulls of some extinct human races among them.  According to this scenario, men and today’s apes have common ancestors.  These creatures evolved in time and some of them became the apes of today while another group that followed another branch of evolution became the men of today.  However, all the paleontological, anatomical and biological findings have demonstrated that this claim of evolution is as fictitious and invalid as all the others.  No sound or real evidence has been put forward to prove that there is a relationship between man and ape, except forgeries, distortions, and misleading drawings and comments.  The fossil record indicates to us that throughout history, men have been men and apes have been apes.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (98)

Support independent publishing: Buy this book on Lulu.

Buy The Flat Earth Conspiracy 252-Page Paperback, eBook, or ePub

Monday, November 2, 2015

200 Proofs Earth is Flat and Motionless!

In just 3 months since the release of my fifth book, "200 Proofs Earth is Not a Spinning Ball," it has been downloaded by an unbelievable 500,000+ people and growing daily by the thousands!  Thanks so much to everyone who is working hard spreading the truth of our flat, motionless Earth.  Since many of you have been asking me to turn the 200 Proofs into a coffee-table book, I have decided to make one available in addition to the free eBook.  This hard-cover collector's edition features full color cover/interior photos and makes the perfect Christmas gift to help awaken your friends and family to the greatest deception in history.  

Support independent publishing: Buy this book on Lulu.

I also recently turned the 200 Proofs into a 2-hour audio/videobook presentation which has received almost 100,000 views in its first week.  Thanks again to everyone for your continued support and helping spread the word making this most important information go viral!

Monday, October 12, 2015

Evolution is a Lie - Intelligent Design is the Truth!

The popular modern scientific-materialist-atheist worldview propagated by NASA, the mainstream media and the public education system is that you are here because nothingness for no reason exploded and created everything!  Before time, space, matter, consciousness, intelligence, and life, there was nothing.  Then the nothingness exploded, and instead of destroying things like every other explosion ever, this explosion created things, created everything!  The nothingness explosion somehow created space, time and all matter in the universe in an instant and for no reason at all.  Then all the creationary explosive debris flying outwards at over 670 million miles per hour for 14 billion years culminated to create you!  

Yes, first some of the more gaseous nothing came together forming suns and stars, then solid pieces of the nothing came together forming planets and moons, then the nothing-turned-hydrogen and oxygen came together forming water on the nothing planet Earth, out of which single-celled living organisms magically appeared, got to work dividing and multiplying into multi-celled conscious organisms, which multiplied and divided and mutated into various forms of sea-life which adapted and evolved and crawled onto land, replaced gills with lungs, lost tails, grew opposable thumbs and started grasping at straws like this ridiculous nihilistic notion of Big Bang evolution.

This anti-God materialist theory of evolution has been staunchly protected by the infallibility of “science” for over 150 years, but in actual fact, just as “science” has failed to find one true, valid proof that Earth is a ball spinning around the Sun, scientists have failed to discover a single piece of evidence that the material world is a product of blind chance evolution.  Furthermore, Big Bang evolution actually requires and pre-supposes many other claims which have already been proven false in previous chapters, such as the Plurality of Worlds, Newton’s theory of Gravity, Einstein’s theory of Relativity, Stars being distant Suns, and Earth being a Planet, not a Plane.

Evolutionary theory claims that life started with a cell that formed by chance.  According to this scenario, four billion years ago various lifeless chemical compounds underwent a reaction in the primordial atmosphere on the earth in which the effects of thunderbolts and atmospheric pressure led to the formation of the first living cell.  The first thing that must be said is that the claim that inanimate materials can come together to form life is an unscientific one that has not been verified by any experiment or observation.  Life is only generated from life.  Each living cell is formed by the replication of another cell.  No one in the world has ever succeeded in forming a living cell by bringing inanimate materials together, not even in the most advanced laboratories.  The theory of evolution faces no greater crisis than on the point of explaining the emergence of life.  The reason is that organic molecules are so complex that their formation cannot possibly be explained as being coincidental and it is manifestly impossible for an organic cell to have been formed by chance.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (128-130)

How could all the inter-connected and compartmentalized components, the cell wall, the cell membrane, the mitochondria, proteins, DNA, RNA, ribosomes, lysosomes, cytoplasm, vacuoles, nucleus and other cell parts magically come together and create conscious intelligent life from unconscious dead matter?  Just making one average-sized protein molecule is already composed of 288 amino acids of 12 varying types which can be combined 10300 power different ways!  Of all those possibilities, only one forms the desired protein molecule and there are over 600 types of proteins combined in the smallest bacterias ever discovered.  

Astronomer Fred Hoyle compared the odds that all the multi-faceted and multi-functional parts of a cell could coincidentally come together and create life analogous to “a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard and assembling a Boeing 747 from the materials therein!  Hoyle wrote that, “If there were a basic principle of matter which somehow drove organic systems toward life, its existence should easily be demonstrable in the laboratory.  One could, for instance, take a swimming bath to represent the primordial soup.  Fill it with any chemicals of a non-biological nature you please.  Pump any gases over it, or through it, you please, and shine any kind of radiation on it that takes your fancy.  Let the experiment proceed for a year and see how many of those 2,000 enzymes (proteins produced by living cells) have appeared in the bath.  I will give the answer, and so save the time and trouble and expense of actually doing the experiment.  You will find nothing at all, except possibly for a tarry sludge composed of amino acids and other simple organic chemicals.”  Even if scientists placed all the chemical substances necessary for life in a tank, applied to them any processes of their choice, and waited for billions of years, not a single living cell could or would ever form.

"The likelihood of the spontaneous formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with 40,000 zeros after it … It is big enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution.  The beginnings of life were not random; they must have been the product of purposeful intelligence.  From my earliest training as a scientist, I was very strongly brainwashed to believe that science cannot be consistent with any kind of deliberate creation.  That notion has had to be painfully shed.  At the moment, I can’t find any rational argument to knock down the view which argues for conversion to God.  We used to have an open mind; now we realize that the only logical answer to life is creation - and not accidental random shuffling.”  -Astrobiologist Chandra Wickramasinghe

Scientific proofs from such branches of science as paleontology, microbiology and anatomy reveal evolution to be a bankrupt theory.  It has been stressed that evolution is incompatible with scientific discoveries, reason and logic.  Those who believe in the theory of evolution think that a few atoms and molecules thrown into a huge vat could produce thinking, reasoning, professors, university students, scientists, artists, antelopes, lemon trees and carnations.  Moreover, the scientists and professors who believe in this nonsense are educated people.  That is why it is quite justifiable to speak of the theory of evolution as ‘the most potent spell in history.’  Never before has any other belief or idea so taken away peoples’ powers of reason, refused to allow them to think intelligently and logically, and hidden the truth from them as if they had been blindfolded.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (178-179)

Consciousness, life, the beautiful diversity, complexity and interconnectedness of nature and the universe simply could not be the result of some random coincidental physical phenomenon.  If the likelihood of life forming from inanimate matter is 1 x 1040,000 power, then those are precisely the magnificent odds against which the universe could be unintelligently designed!  Even the simple formation of DNA and RNA molecules are similarly beyond the reach of chance to come together, equivalent to 1 x 10600 power, or 10 with 600 zeros afterwards!  Such a mathematical improbability actually so closely borders the impossible that the word “improbable” becomes misleading.  Mathematicians who regularly work with these infinitesimally small numbers say anything beyond 1 x 1050 powers should be considered, for all intents and purposes, impossible.

Dr. Leslie Orgel, an associate of Francis Crick, the discoverer of DNA wrote, “It is extremely improbable that proteins and nucleic acids, both of which are structurally complex, arose spontaneously in the same place at the same time.  Yet it also seems impossible to have one without the other.  And so, at first glance, one might have to conclude that life could never, in fact, have originated by chemical means.  Or as Turkish Evolutionist Professor Ali Demirsoy stated “the probability of the coincidental formation of cythochrome-C, just one of the essential proteins for life, is as unlikely as the possibility of a monkey writing the history of humanity on a typewriter without making any mistakes … Some metaphysical powers beyond our definition must have acted in its formation.

Let us suppose that millions of years ago a cell was formed which had acquired everything necessary for life, and that it duly ‘came to life.’  The theory of evolution again collapses at this point.  For even if this cell had existed for a while, it would eventually have died and after its death, nothing would have remained, and everything would have reverted to where it had started.  This is because this first living cell, lacking any genetic information, would not have been able to reproduce and start a new generation.  Life would have ended with its death.  The genetic system does not only consist of DNA.  The following things must also exist in the same environment: enzymes to read the code on the DNA, messenger RNA to be produced after reading these codes, a ribosome to which messenger RNA will attach according to this code, transfer RNA to transfer the amino acids to the ribosome for use in production, and extremely complex enzymes to carry out numerous intermediary processes.  Such an environment cannot exist anywhere apart from a totally isolated and completely controlled environment such as the cell, where all the essential raw materials and energy resources exist.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (170)

The Big Bang theory is easily proven false as the nature of explosions is to destroy, to break things down into their constituent parts, increasing chaos and decreasing order; explosions simply do not and cannot create things, causing disparate parts to combine into more ordered wholes as the Big Bang theory contends.  Similarly, the theory of evolution is proven false by entropy, the second law of thermodynamics.  It is a fact that systems left to their own devices tend to become corrupted, disordered and dispersed over time.  All things, living or not, wear out, deteriorate and decay.  They do NOT spontaneously come together over time, in incredibly implausible combinations creating diverse, complex and beautiful living forms!  Thus the theory of evolution is in direct opposition to the law of entropy; Evolution supposes things become more ordered, more structured and more complex over time,  but from rust to mould to rotting corpses, nature is everywhere at odds with such a notion.  Furthermore, according to the Le Chatelier Principle in chemistry, life could not have been formed in the sea as evolutionists allege anyway; since the peptide bond created by amino acid chains produces water molecules, it is not possible for such a reaction to take place in a hydrous environment.

Organic matter can self-reproduce only if it exists as a fully developed cell with all its organelles and in an appropriate environment where it can survive, exchange materials, and get energy from its surroundings.  This means that the first cell on earth was formed ‘ all of a sudden’ together with its amazingly complex structure … What would you think if you went out hiking in the depths of a thick forest and ran across a brand-new car among the trees?  Would you imagine that various elements in the forest had come together by chance over millions of years and produced such a vehicle?  All the parts in the car are made of products such as iron, copper, and rubber - the raw ingredients for which are all found on the earth - but would this fact lead you to think that these materials had synthesized ‘by chance’ and then come together and manufactured such a car?  There is no doubt that anyone with a sound mind would realize that the car was the product of an intelligent design - in other words, a factory - and wonder what it was doing there in the middle of the forest.  The sudden emergence of a complex structure in a complete form, quite out of the blue, shows that this is the work of an intelligent agent.  An extraordinarily complex system like the cell is no doubt created by a superior will and wisdom.  In other words, it came into existence as a Creation of God.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (170-171)

Many facets of nature are far too complex, specialized, and perfect to ever have arisen simply due to blind chance changes over time.  For example, the eye with its various parts and mechanisms all working together with the brain producing the sharpest, clearest 3-D color images imaginable.  Even the most advanced cameras and plasma screens ever produced by humans cannot provide an image as perfect in detail and clarity as our own eyes.  Charles Darwin, the originator of the theory of evolution himself admitted that “the thought of the eye made him cold all over!” as he knew what an impassable obstacle the eye presented for his theory.  And it is the same with ears and audio equipment.  For over a century many thousands of researchers, scientists and engineers have been working in factories across the world trying to produce sharper, clearer audio/video playing and recording devices, never coming close to the capabilities and perfection of the ear and eye.

Look at the book you read, your hands with which you hold it, then lift your head and look around you.  Have you ever seen such a sharp and distinct image as this one at any other place?  Even the most developed television screen produced by the greatest television producer in the world cannot provide such a sharp image for you.  This is a three-dimensional, colored, and extremely sharp image … No one would say that a HI-FI or a camera came into being as a result of chance.  So how can it be claimed that the technologies that exist in the human body, which are superior even to these, could have come into being as a result of a chain of coincidences called evolution?  It is evident that the eye, the ear, and indeed all the other parts of the human body are products of a very superior Creation.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (175-178)

Charles Darwin, in his “Origin of Species,” the veritable Bible of atheist-materialists, stated that, “If my theory be true, numberless intermediate varieties, linking most closely all of the species of the same group together must assuredly have existed … Consequently evidence of their former existence could be found only amongst fossil remains.”  Darwin himself knew no such “transitional forms” had been discovered and hoped that they would be found in the future.  He even admitted in his “Difficulties on Theory” chapter that these missing intermediate forms were the biggest stumbling-block for his theory.  He called it “the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory.

According to the theory of evolution, every living species has emerged from a predecessor.  One species which existed previously turned into something else over time and all species have come into being in this way.  According to the theory, this transformation proceeds gradually over millions of years.  If this were the case, then innumerable intermediate species should have lived during the immense period of time when these transformations were supposedly occurring.  For instance, there should have lived in the past some half-fish/half-reptile creatures which had acquired some reptilian traits in addition to the fish traits they already had.  Or there should have existed some reptile/bird creatures, which had acquired some avian traits in addition to the reptilian traits, they already possessed.  Evolutionists refer to these imaginary creatures, which they believe to have lived in the past as, ‘transitional forms.’  If such animals had really existed, there would have been millions, even billions, of them.  More importantly, the remains of these creatures should be present in the fossil record.  The number of these transitional forms should have been even greater than that of present animal species and their remains should be found all over the world.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (61)

Darwin hoped that transitional forms of animal species gradually evolving into different species would eventually be discovered at some future time in the fossil record.  To this day, however, no such transitional forms have ever been found anywhere in the world.  Darwin’s observations regarding natural selection and adaptation were certainly correct.  So-called “micro-evolution” of various traits and characteristics within a species has been confirmed and widely exists, but “macro-evolution,” the supposed transformation from one species into a completely different species has never been observed, and no evidence of such evolution exists anywhere in the fossil record.  Colin Patterson, senior paleontologist for the British Museum of Natural History and an ardent evolutionist, even he admits that Darwinists must concede natural selection has never been observed to actually cause anything to evolve: “No one has ever produced a species by mechanisms of natural selection.  No one has ever got near it and most of the current argument in neo-Darwinism is about this question.

Even in the most ‘scientific’ books about evolution, the stage of ‘transition from water to land’ - one of the unexplainable points of evolution - is given in such simplicity that they do not prove to be believable even for children.  According to evolution, life began in water and the first developed animals on earth were fish.  According to the story, one day fish species developed the ability to climb out of water and moved on land!  The theory continues that fish which chose to live on land had feet instead of fins and lungs instead of gills!  In most of the books about evolution, nobody explains ‘why’ the transition occurred.  Even in the most ‘scientific’ sources, writers suddenly jump to conclusions like ‘and transition from water to land occurred’ without providing a satisfactory answer regarding how the process worked.  Yet how did this transformation occur?  It is obvious that a fish cannot survive out of water for more than one or two minutes.  If, we assume that a drought really existed as claimed by evolutionists, and fish were, for some reason, drawn to lands then what would happen to fish even if this process lasts for ten millions of years?  The answer is straight: Fish leaving the water would inevitably die in a few moments.  Even if this process lasted for ten millions of years, the answer would still be the same; All fish would die one by one.  Nobody would dare to say: ‘Maybe after 4 million years some of the fish suddenly acquired lungs while they were trying to survive.  This would no doubt be an illogical assertion!  However that is exactly what evolutionists claim.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (212)

The theory of evolution supposes that life somehow originated and evolved in the sea until somehow something that had theretofore lived only under water grew lungs and feet and started living on land!  Darwinists claim fish (creatures living only under water) turned into amphibians (creatures living on both land and water) and then amphibians evolved into reptiles (creatures living only on land).  Then they propose some reptiles evolved wings and became birds while other reptiles evolved and became mammals.  None of these transitional forms have ever been found, however, nor could they realistically exist either.  For example amphibian eggs develop only in water whereas amniotic eggs develop only on land, so some sort of gradual step-by-step evolution scenario is impossible since without perfect, complete eggs a species cannot survive.  Reptiles allegedly evolving into mammals is another example of evolutionist wishful-thinking.  Reptiles are cold-blooded, lay eggs, do not suckle their young, have one middle-ear bone, three mandible bones and bodies covered in scales, whereas mammals are warm-blooded, have live births, suckle their young, have three middle-ear bones, one mandible, and are covered in fur or hair - far too many distinct differences for “gradual evolution.”  Reptiles evolving wings is another sheer impossibility, as the structure of land-dwelling reptiles and air-dwelling birds are far too different.  Engin Korur, a Turkish evolutionist admits the problem wings present to Darwin’s theory, “The common trait of the eyes and the wings is that they can only function if they are fully developed.  In other words a half-way developed eye cannot see; a bird with half-formed wings cannot fly.  How these organs came into being has remained one of the mysteries of nature that needs to be enlightened.”

Although it is cloaked in the guise of science, the theory of evolution is nothing but a deceit: a deceit defended only for the benefit of materialistic philosophy; a deceit based not on science but on brainwashing, propaganda, and fraud.  The theory of evolution is a theory that fails at the very first step.  The reason is that evolutionists are unable to explain even the formation of a single protein.  Neither the laws of probability nor the laws of physics and chemistry offer any chance for the fortuitous formation of life.  Does it sound logical or reasonable when not even a single chance-formed protein can exist, that millions of such proteins combined in an order to produce the cell of a living thing; and that billions of cells managed to form and then came together by chance to produce living things; and that from them generated fish; and that those that passed to land turned into reptiles, birds, and that this is how all the millions of different species on earth were formed?  They have never found a single transitional form such as a half-fish/half-reptile or half-reptile/half-bird.  Nor have they been able to prove that a protein, or even a single amino acid molecule composing a protein, could have formed under what they call primordial earth conditions; not even in their elaborately-equipped laboratories have they succeeded in doing that.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (214-215)

Darwin's theory is a concept that concerns not only biology, chemistry, astronomy and metaphysics, but actually formed the basis for new political outlooks as well. Within a very short time, this new progressive political attitude was redefined as “Social Darwinism,” and as many historians have suggested, Social Darwinism became the ideological basis of fascism, communism, and eugenics.  Darwin’s ideas of “natural selection” and “survival of the fittest” were central to the insane ideologies of many of the 20th century’s worst mass murderers including Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Trotsky, Marx, and Pol Pot.  Charles Darwin himself was a blatant racist who elucidated in his book “The Descent of Man” how blacks and aborigines, due to their inferiority to Caucasians would “be done away with by the civilized races in time.”

Freemasonic records state that Charles Darwin’s grandfather Erasmus Darwin was a philosopher, scientist and physician who advanced ideas on evolution back in the 18th century.  Before coming to Derby in 1788, Dr. Darwin had been made a Mason in the famous Time Immemorial Lodge of Cannongate Kilwinning No. 2 of Scotland.  He also maintained close connections to the Jacobin Masons in France and Adam Weishaupt’s Illuminati.  Sir Francis Darwin and Reginald Darwin, two of his sons, were also made Masons in Tyrian Lodge No. 253 at Derby.  Charles Darwin does not appear on the rolls of the Lodge but it is most likely that he, like his Grandfather, his Sons and his “Bulldog” T.H.Huxley, was a Mason.  Charles wrote that he used to listen to his grandfather’s ideas of evolution and was greatly influenced by them.  Erasmus was the first man to put forward the notion of evolution in England.  He was known as a “respected” person, but he had a very dark private life and at least two illegitimate children.  Charles himself would go on to marry his first cousin and have three children die due to complications from inbreeding.

Masons, thinking that Darwinism could serve their goals, played a great role in its dissemination among the masses.  As soon as Darwin’s theory was published, a group of volunteer propagandists formed around it, the most famous of whom was Thomas Huxley who was called Darwin’s ‘bulldog.’  Huxley ‘whose ardent advocacy of Darwinism was the single factor most responsible for its rapid acceptance’ brought the world’s attention to the theory of evolution in the Debate at the Oxford University Museum in which he entered into on June 30th, 1860 with the bishop of Oxford, Samuel Wilberforce.  Huxley’s great dedication to spreading the idea of evolution, together with his establishment connections, is brought into further light according to the following fact: Huxley was a member of the Royal Society, one of England’s most prestigious scientific institutions and, like nearly all the other members of this institution, was a senior Mason.  Other members of the Royal Society lent Darwin significant support … In short, Darwin wasn’t acting alone; from the moment his theory was proposed, he received the support that came from the social classes and groups whose nucleus was made up of Masons.  -Harun Yahya, “The Theory of Evolution Revisited”

An important example which proves the fact that Darwinism is one of the biggest deceptions of atheistic freemasonry is a resolution carried in a mason meeting.  The 33rd degree Supreme Council of Mizraim Freemasonry at Paris, reveals in its minutes its promotion of evolution as science, while they themselves scoffed at the theory.  The minutes read as follows: ‘It is with this object in view [the scientific theory of evolution] that we are constantly by means of our press, arousing a blind confidence in these theories.  The intellectuals will puff themselves up with their knowledge and without any logical verification of them will put into effect all the information available from science, which our agentur specialists have cunningly pieced together for the purpose of educating their minds in the direction we want.  Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism.’  Atheistic freemasonry in the United States has picked up the resolution of Mizraim before long.  New Age magazine in its March 1922 issue stated that the kingdom of atheistic freemasonry will be established by evolution and the development of man himself.  As seen above, the false scientific image of evolution is a deception set in the 33rd degree atheist Masonic lodges.  Atheist masons openly admit that they will use the scientists and media which are under their control to present this deception as scientific, which even they find funny.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Fundamental Philosophy of Atheistic Freemasonry”

The Mimar Sinan journal published by the Turkish Great Freemasonry Lodge has openly discussed their mission to use Darwinism to overthrow religion and belief in God.  One article mentioned, “Today the only valid scientific theory accepted both by most civilized countries and underdeveloped ones remains to be Darwinism.  However, neither the church nor other religions have collapsed yet.  The legend of Adam and Eve is still being taught as religious teachings in holy books.”  In other words, it seems one of the main goals of modern Masons, besides convincing people of the ball-Earth and Big Bang, is to abolish the biblical creation story and replace it with their godless myth of blind chance evolution.  Just like Copernicus never claimed to have any new or special evidence for his heliocentric theory, Darwin never claimed to have any verifiable scientific evidence proving his evolution theory, yet here we are 150 years later, no closer to a proof of either, but with the vast majority of indoctrinated sheeple convinced they are monkey-men hanging from a spinning ball!

When we look at the Western media carefully, we frequently come across news dwelling on the theory of evolution.  Leading media organizations, and well-known and ‘respectable’ magazines periodically bring this subject up.  When their approach is examined, one gets the impression that this theory is an absolutely proven fact leaving no room for discussion.  Ordinary people reading this kind of news naturally start to think that the theory of evolution is a fact as certain as any law of mathematics.  They print headlines in big fonts: ‘According to Time magazine, a new fossil that completes the gap in the fossil chain has been found’; or ‘Nature indicates that scientists have shed light on the final issues of evolutionary theory.’  The finding of ‘the last missing link of the evolution chain’ means nothing because there is not a single thing proven about evolution.  In short, both the media and academic circles, which are at the disposal of anti-religionist power-centers, maintain an entirely evolutionist view and they impose this on society.  This imposition is so effective that it has in time turned evolution into an idea that is never to be rejected.  Denying evolution is seen as being contradictory to science and fundamental realities.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (210)

The information we have considered throughout this book has shown us that the theory of evolution has no scientific basis, and that, on the contrary, evolutionist claims conflict with scientific facts.  In other words, the force that keeps evolution alive is not science.  The theory of evolution is maintained by some ‘scientists,’ but behind it there is another influence at work.  This other influence is materialist philosophy.  Materialist philosophy is one of the oldest beliefs in the world, and assumes the existence of matter as its basic principle.  According to this view, matter has always existed, and everything that exists consists of matter.  This makes belief in a Creator impossible, of course, because if matter has always existed, and if everything consists of matter, then there can be no suprematerial Creator who created it.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (202)

The fact of the matter is evolution is, was, and always has been a foregone conclusion by people looking for any answer other than God.  When you metaphysically exclude the existence of an intelligent creative consciousness behind the creation of the material world, the only answer left is random happenstance!  Everything must be the result of coincidence, chance and circumstance once you have excluded the possibility of a supreme intelligent creator.  But no matter how diligently it is denied, the truth remains: you simply are not some cosmic accident, not the result of random happenstance, chance or coincidence, your eyes, your ears, your feelings, your life and consciousness are all the result of the most supremely intelligent design!  My previous book Spiritual Science is a 284-page refutation of materialist science and philosophy which proves far beyond any reasonable doubt that atheistic materialism is an invalid, untenable, destructive philosophy, and that consciousness and intelligence existed before and beyond all space, time and matter.

Malcolm Muggeridge, an atheist philosopher and supporter of evolution for 60 years finally admitted before his death that, “I myself am convinced that the theory of evolution, especially the extent to which it’s been applied, will be one of the great jokes in the history books in the future.  Posterity will marvel that so very flimsy and dubious an hypothesis could be accepted with the incredible credulity that it has.”

According to these professors, a number of simple chemical substances first came together and formed a protein - which is no more possible than a randomly scattered collection of letters coming together to form a poem.  Then, other coincidences led to the emergence of other proteins.  These then also combined by chance in an organized manner.  Not just proteins, but DNA, RNA, enzymes, hormones, and cell organelles, all of which are very complex structures within the cell, coincidentally happened to emerge and come together.  As a result of these billions of coincidences, the first cell came into being … If you put a carved stone or wooden idol in front of these people and told them, ‘Look, this idol created this room and everything in it’ they would say that was utterly stupid and refuse to believe it.  Yet despite that they declare the nonsense that ‘The unconscious process known as chance gradually brought this world and all the billions of wonderful living things in it into being’ to be the greatest scientific explanation.  In short, these people regard chance as a god, and claim that it is intelligent, conscious and powerful enough to create living things and all the sensitive balances in the universe.  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (32)

Support independent publishing: Buy this book on Lulu.

Buy The Flat Earth Conspiracy 252-Page Paperback, eBook, or ePub