Monday, October 12, 2015

Evolution is a Lie - Intelligent Design is the Truth!

The popular modern scientific-materialist-atheist worldview propagated by NASA, the mainstream media and the public education system is that you are here because nothingness for no reason exploded and created everything!  Before time, space, matter, consciousness, intelligence, and life, there was nothing.  Then the nothingness exploded, and instead of destroying things like every other explosion ever, this explosion created things, created everything!  The nothingness explosion somehow created space, time and all matter in the universe in an instant and for no reason at all.  Then all the creationary explosive debris flying outwards at over 670 million miles per hour for 14 billion years culminated to create you!  

Yes, first some of the more gaseous nothing came together forming suns and stars, then solid pieces of the nothing came together forming planets and moons, then the nothing-turned-hydrogen and oxygen came together forming water on the nothing planet Earth, out of which single-celled living organisms magically appeared, got to work dividing and multiplying into multi-celled conscious organisms, which multiplied and divided and mutated into various forms of sea-life which adapted and evolved and crawled onto land, replaced gills with lungs, lost tails, grew opposable thumbs and started grasping at straws like this ridiculous nihilistic notion of Big Bang evolution.

This anti-God materialist theory of evolution has been staunchly protected by the infallibility of “science” for over 150 years, but in actual fact, just as “science” has failed to find one true, valid proof that Earth is a ball spinning around the Sun, scientists have failed to discover a single piece of evidence that the material world is a product of blind chance evolution.  Furthermore, Big Bang evolution actually requires and pre-supposes many other claims which have already been proven false in previous chapters, such as the Plurality of Worlds, Newton’s theory of Gravity, Einstein’s theory of Relativity, Stars being distant Suns, and Earth being a Planet, not a Plane.

Evolutionary theory claims that life started with a cell that formed by chance.  According to this scenario, four billion years ago various lifeless chemical compounds underwent a reaction in the primordial atmosphere on the earth in which the effects of thunderbolts and atmospheric pressure led to the formation of the first living cell.  The first thing that must be said is that the claim that inanimate materials can come together to form life is an unscientific one that has not been verified by any experiment or observation.  Life is only generated from life.  Each living cell is formed by the replication of another cell.  No one in the world has ever succeeded in forming a living cell by bringing inanimate materials together, not even in the most advanced laboratories.  The theory of evolution faces no greater crisis than on the point of explaining the emergence of life.  The reason is that organic molecules are so complex that their formation cannot possibly be explained as being coincidental and it is manifestly impossible for an organic cell to have been formed by chance.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (128-130)

How could all the inter-connected and compartmentalized components, the cell wall, the cell membrane, the mitochondria, proteins, DNA, RNA, ribosomes, lysosomes, cytoplasm, vacuoles, nucleus and other cell parts magically come together and create conscious intelligent life from unconscious dead matter?  Just making one average-sized protein molecule is already composed of 288 amino acids of 12 varying types which can be combined 10300 power different ways!  Of all those possibilities, only one forms the desired protein molecule and there are over 600 types of proteins combined in the smallest bacterias ever discovered.  

Astronomer Fred Hoyle compared the odds that all the multi-faceted and multi-functional parts of a cell could coincidentally come together and create life analogous to “a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard and assembling a Boeing 747 from the materials therein!  Hoyle wrote that, “If there were a basic principle of matter which somehow drove organic systems toward life, its existence should easily be demonstrable in the laboratory.  One could, for instance, take a swimming bath to represent the primordial soup.  Fill it with any chemicals of a non-biological nature you please.  Pump any gases over it, or through it, you please, and shine any kind of radiation on it that takes your fancy.  Let the experiment proceed for a year and see how many of those 2,000 enzymes (proteins produced by living cells) have appeared in the bath.  I will give the answer, and so save the time and trouble and expense of actually doing the experiment.  You will find nothing at all, except possibly for a tarry sludge composed of amino acids and other simple organic chemicals.”  Even if scientists placed all the chemical substances necessary for life in a tank, applied to them any processes of their choice, and waited for billions of years, not a single living cell could or would ever form.

"The likelihood of the spontaneous formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with 40,000 zeros after it … It is big enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution.  The beginnings of life were not random; they must have been the product of purposeful intelligence.  From my earliest training as a scientist, I was very strongly brainwashed to believe that science cannot be consistent with any kind of deliberate creation.  That notion has had to be painfully shed.  At the moment, I can’t find any rational argument to knock down the view which argues for conversion to God.  We used to have an open mind; now we realize that the only logical answer to life is creation - and not accidental random shuffling.”  -Astrobiologist Chandra Wickramasinghe

Scientific proofs from such branches of science as paleontology, microbiology and anatomy reveal evolution to be a bankrupt theory.  It has been stressed that evolution is incompatible with scientific discoveries, reason and logic.  Those who believe in the theory of evolution think that a few atoms and molecules thrown into a huge vat could produce thinking, reasoning, professors, university students, scientists, artists, antelopes, lemon trees and carnations.  Moreover, the scientists and professors who believe in this nonsense are educated people.  That is why it is quite justifiable to speak of the theory of evolution as ‘the most potent spell in history.’  Never before has any other belief or idea so taken away peoples’ powers of reason, refused to allow them to think intelligently and logically, and hidden the truth from them as if they had been blindfolded.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (178-179)

Consciousness, life, the beautiful diversity, complexity and interconnectedness of nature and the universe simply could not be the result of some random coincidental physical phenomenon.  If the likelihood of life forming from inanimate matter is 1 x 1040,000 power, then those are precisely the magnificent odds against which the universe could be unintelligently designed!  Even the simple formation of DNA and RNA molecules are similarly beyond the reach of chance to come together, equivalent to 1 x 10600 power, or 10 with 600 zeros afterwards!  Such a mathematical improbability actually so closely borders the impossible that the word “improbable” becomes misleading.  Mathematicians who regularly work with these infinitesimally small numbers say anything beyond 1 x 1050 powers should be considered, for all intents and purposes, impossible.

Dr. Leslie Orgel, an associate of Francis Crick, the discoverer of DNA wrote, “It is extremely improbable that proteins and nucleic acids, both of which are structurally complex, arose spontaneously in the same place at the same time.  Yet it also seems impossible to have one without the other.  And so, at first glance, one might have to conclude that life could never, in fact, have originated by chemical means.  Or as Turkish Evolutionist Professor Ali Demirsoy stated “the probability of the coincidental formation of cythochrome-C, just one of the essential proteins for life, is as unlikely as the possibility of a monkey writing the history of humanity on a typewriter without making any mistakes … Some metaphysical powers beyond our definition must have acted in its formation.

Let us suppose that millions of years ago a cell was formed which had acquired everything necessary for life, and that it duly ‘came to life.’  The theory of evolution again collapses at this point.  For even if this cell had existed for a while, it would eventually have died and after its death, nothing would have remained, and everything would have reverted to where it had started.  This is because this first living cell, lacking any genetic information, would not have been able to reproduce and start a new generation.  Life would have ended with its death.  The genetic system does not only consist of DNA.  The following things must also exist in the same environment: enzymes to read the code on the DNA, messenger RNA to be produced after reading these codes, a ribosome to which messenger RNA will attach according to this code, transfer RNA to transfer the amino acids to the ribosome for use in production, and extremely complex enzymes to carry out numerous intermediary processes.  Such an environment cannot exist anywhere apart from a totally isolated and completely controlled environment such as the cell, where all the essential raw materials and energy resources exist.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (170)

The Big Bang theory is easily proven false as the nature of explosions is to destroy, to break things down into their constituent parts, increasing chaos and decreasing order; explosions simply do not and cannot create things, causing disparate parts to combine into more ordered wholes as the Big Bang theory contends.  Similarly, the theory of evolution is proven false by entropy, the second law of thermodynamics.  It is a fact that systems left to their own devices tend to become corrupted, disordered and dispersed over time.  All things, living or not, wear out, deteriorate and decay.  They do NOT spontaneously come together over time, in incredibly implausible combinations creating diverse, complex and beautiful living forms!  Thus the theory of evolution is in direct opposition to the law of entropy; Evolution supposes things become more ordered, more structured and more complex over time,  but from rust to mould to rotting corpses, nature is everywhere at odds with such a notion.  Furthermore, according to the Le Chatelier Principle in chemistry, life could not have been formed in the sea as evolutionists allege anyway; since the peptide bond created by amino acid chains produces water molecules, it is not possible for such a reaction to take place in a hydrous environment.

Organic matter can self-reproduce only if it exists as a fully developed cell with all its organelles and in an appropriate environment where it can survive, exchange materials, and get energy from its surroundings.  This means that the first cell on earth was formed ‘ all of a sudden’ together with its amazingly complex structure … What would you think if you went out hiking in the depths of a thick forest and ran across a brand-new car among the trees?  Would you imagine that various elements in the forest had come together by chance over millions of years and produced such a vehicle?  All the parts in the car are made of products such as iron, copper, and rubber - the raw ingredients for which are all found on the earth - but would this fact lead you to think that these materials had synthesized ‘by chance’ and then come together and manufactured such a car?  There is no doubt that anyone with a sound mind would realize that the car was the product of an intelligent design - in other words, a factory - and wonder what it was doing there in the middle of the forest.  The sudden emergence of a complex structure in a complete form, quite out of the blue, shows that this is the work of an intelligent agent.  An extraordinarily complex system like the cell is no doubt created by a superior will and wisdom.  In other words, it came into existence as a Creation of God.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (170-171)

Many facets of nature are far too complex, specialized, and perfect to ever have arisen simply due to blind chance changes over time.  For example, the eye with its various parts and mechanisms all working together with the brain producing the sharpest, clearest 3-D color images imaginable.  Even the most advanced cameras and plasma screens ever produced by humans cannot provide an image as perfect in detail and clarity as our own eyes.  Charles Darwin, the originator of the theory of evolution himself admitted that “the thought of the eye made him cold all over!” as he knew what an impassable obstacle the eye presented for his theory.  And it is the same with ears and audio equipment.  For over a century many thousands of researchers, scientists and engineers have been working in factories across the world trying to produce sharper, clearer audio/video playing and recording devices, never coming close to the capabilities and perfection of the ear and eye.

Look at the book you read, your hands with which you hold it, then lift your head and look around you.  Have you ever seen such a sharp and distinct image as this one at any other place?  Even the most developed television screen produced by the greatest television producer in the world cannot provide such a sharp image for you.  This is a three-dimensional, colored, and extremely sharp image … No one would say that a HI-FI or a camera came into being as a result of chance.  So how can it be claimed that the technologies that exist in the human body, which are superior even to these, could have come into being as a result of a chain of coincidences called evolution?  It is evident that the eye, the ear, and indeed all the other parts of the human body are products of a very superior Creation.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (175-178)

Charles Darwin, in his “Origin of Species,” the veritable Bible of atheist-materialists, stated that, “If my theory be true, numberless intermediate varieties, linking most closely all of the species of the same group together must assuredly have existed … Consequently evidence of their former existence could be found only amongst fossil remains.”  Darwin himself knew no such “transitional forms” had been discovered and hoped that they would be found in the future.  He even admitted in his “Difficulties on Theory” chapter that these missing intermediate forms were the biggest stumbling-block for his theory.  He called it “the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory.

According to the theory of evolution, every living species has emerged from a predecessor.  One species which existed previously turned into something else over time and all species have come into being in this way.  According to the theory, this transformation proceeds gradually over millions of years.  If this were the case, then innumerable intermediate species should have lived during the immense period of time when these transformations were supposedly occurring.  For instance, there should have lived in the past some half-fish/half-reptile creatures which had acquired some reptilian traits in addition to the fish traits they already had.  Or there should have existed some reptile/bird creatures, which had acquired some avian traits in addition to the reptilian traits, they already possessed.  Evolutionists refer to these imaginary creatures, which they believe to have lived in the past as, ‘transitional forms.’  If such animals had really existed, there would have been millions, even billions, of them.  More importantly, the remains of these creatures should be present in the fossil record.  The number of these transitional forms should have been even greater than that of present animal species and their remains should be found all over the world.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (61)

Darwin hoped that transitional forms of animal species gradually evolving into different species would eventually be discovered at some future time in the fossil record.  To this day, however, no such transitional forms have ever been found anywhere in the world.  Darwin’s observations regarding natural selection and adaptation were certainly correct.  So-called “micro-evolution” of various traits and characteristics within a species has been confirmed and widely exists, but “macro-evolution,” the supposed transformation from one species into a completely different species has never been observed, and no evidence of such evolution exists anywhere in the fossil record.  Colin Patterson, senior paleontologist for the British Museum of Natural History and an ardent evolutionist, even he admits that Darwinists must concede natural selection has never been observed to actually cause anything to evolve: “No one has ever produced a species by mechanisms of natural selection.  No one has ever got near it and most of the current argument in neo-Darwinism is about this question.

Even in the most ‘scientific’ books about evolution, the stage of ‘transition from water to land’ - one of the unexplainable points of evolution - is given in such simplicity that they do not prove to be believable even for children.  According to evolution, life began in water and the first developed animals on earth were fish.  According to the story, one day fish species developed the ability to climb out of water and moved on land!  The theory continues that fish which chose to live on land had feet instead of fins and lungs instead of gills!  In most of the books about evolution, nobody explains ‘why’ the transition occurred.  Even in the most ‘scientific’ sources, writers suddenly jump to conclusions like ‘and transition from water to land occurred’ without providing a satisfactory answer regarding how the process worked.  Yet how did this transformation occur?  It is obvious that a fish cannot survive out of water for more than one or two minutes.  If, we assume that a drought really existed as claimed by evolutionists, and fish were, for some reason, drawn to lands then what would happen to fish even if this process lasts for ten millions of years?  The answer is straight: Fish leaving the water would inevitably die in a few moments.  Even if this process lasted for ten millions of years, the answer would still be the same; All fish would die one by one.  Nobody would dare to say: ‘Maybe after 4 million years some of the fish suddenly acquired lungs while they were trying to survive.  This would no doubt be an illogical assertion!  However that is exactly what evolutionists claim.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (212)

The theory of evolution supposes that life somehow originated and evolved in the sea until somehow something that had theretofore lived only under water grew lungs and feet and started living on land!  Darwinists claim fish (creatures living only under water) turned into amphibians (creatures living on both land and water) and then amphibians evolved into reptiles (creatures living only on land).  Then they propose some reptiles evolved wings and became birds while other reptiles evolved and became mammals.  None of these transitional forms have ever been found, however, nor could they realistically exist either.  For example amphibian eggs develop only in water whereas amniotic eggs develop only on land, so some sort of gradual step-by-step evolution scenario is impossible since without perfect, complete eggs a species cannot survive.  Reptiles allegedly evolving into mammals is another example of evolutionist wishful-thinking.  Reptiles are cold-blooded, lay eggs, do not suckle their young, have one middle-ear bone, three mandible bones and bodies covered in scales, whereas mammals are warm-blooded, have live births, suckle their young, have three middle-ear bones, one mandible, and are covered in fur or hair - far too many distinct differences for “gradual evolution.”  Reptiles evolving wings is another sheer impossibility, as the structure of land-dwelling reptiles and air-dwelling birds are far too different.  Engin Korur, a Turkish evolutionist admits the problem wings present to Darwin’s theory, “The common trait of the eyes and the wings is that they can only function if they are fully developed.  In other words a half-way developed eye cannot see; a bird with half-formed wings cannot fly.  How these organs came into being has remained one of the mysteries of nature that needs to be enlightened.”

Although it is cloaked in the guise of science, the theory of evolution is nothing but a deceit: a deceit defended only for the benefit of materialistic philosophy; a deceit based not on science but on brainwashing, propaganda, and fraud.  The theory of evolution is a theory that fails at the very first step.  The reason is that evolutionists are unable to explain even the formation of a single protein.  Neither the laws of probability nor the laws of physics and chemistry offer any chance for the fortuitous formation of life.  Does it sound logical or reasonable when not even a single chance-formed protein can exist, that millions of such proteins combined in an order to produce the cell of a living thing; and that billions of cells managed to form and then came together by chance to produce living things; and that from them generated fish; and that those that passed to land turned into reptiles, birds, and that this is how all the millions of different species on earth were formed?  They have never found a single transitional form such as a half-fish/half-reptile or half-reptile/half-bird.  Nor have they been able to prove that a protein, or even a single amino acid molecule composing a protein, could have formed under what they call primordial earth conditions; not even in their elaborately-equipped laboratories have they succeeded in doing that.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (214-215)

Darwin's theory is a concept that concerns not only biology, chemistry, astronomy and metaphysics, but actually formed the basis for new political outlooks as well. Within a very short time, this new progressive political attitude was redefined as “Social Darwinism,” and as many historians have suggested, Social Darwinism became the ideological basis of fascism, communism, and eugenics.  Darwin’s ideas of “natural selection” and “survival of the fittest” were central to the insane ideologies of many of the 20th century’s worst mass murderers including Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Trotsky, Marx, and Pol Pot.  Charles Darwin himself was a blatant racist who elucidated in his book “The Descent of Man” how blacks and aborigines, due to their inferiority to Caucasians would “be done away with by the civilized races in time.”

Freemasonic records state that Charles Darwin’s grandfather Erasmus Darwin was a philosopher, scientist and physician who advanced ideas on evolution back in the 18th century.  Before coming to Derby in 1788, Dr. Darwin had been made a Mason in the famous Time Immemorial Lodge of Cannongate Kilwinning No. 2 of Scotland.  He also maintained close connections to the Jacobin Masons in France and Adam Weishaupt’s Illuminati.  Sir Francis Darwin and Reginald Darwin, two of his sons, were also made Masons in Tyrian Lodge No. 253 at Derby.  Charles Darwin does not appear on the rolls of the Lodge but it is most likely that he, like his Grandfather, his Sons and his “Bulldog” T.H.Huxley, was a Mason.  Charles wrote that he used to listen to his grandfather’s ideas of evolution and was greatly influenced by them.  Erasmus was the first man to put forward the notion of evolution in England.  He was known as a “respected” person, but he had a very dark private life and at least two illegitimate children.  Charles himself would go on to marry his first cousin and have three children die due to complications from inbreeding.

Masons, thinking that Darwinism could serve their goals, played a great role in its dissemination among the masses.  As soon as Darwin’s theory was published, a group of volunteer propagandists formed around it, the most famous of whom was Thomas Huxley who was called Darwin’s ‘bulldog.’  Huxley ‘whose ardent advocacy of Darwinism was the single factor most responsible for its rapid acceptance’ brought the world’s attention to the theory of evolution in the Debate at the Oxford University Museum in which he entered into on June 30th, 1860 with the bishop of Oxford, Samuel Wilberforce.  Huxley’s great dedication to spreading the idea of evolution, together with his establishment connections, is brought into further light according to the following fact: Huxley was a member of the Royal Society, one of England’s most prestigious scientific institutions and, like nearly all the other members of this institution, was a senior Mason.  Other members of the Royal Society lent Darwin significant support … In short, Darwin wasn’t acting alone; from the moment his theory was proposed, he received the support that came from the social classes and groups whose nucleus was made up of Masons.  -Harun Yahya, “The Theory of Evolution Revisited”

An important example which proves the fact that Darwinism is one of the biggest deceptions of atheistic freemasonry is a resolution carried in a mason meeting.  The 33rd degree Supreme Council of Mizraim Freemasonry at Paris, reveals in its minutes its promotion of evolution as science, while they themselves scoffed at the theory.  The minutes read as follows: ‘It is with this object in view [the scientific theory of evolution] that we are constantly by means of our press, arousing a blind confidence in these theories.  The intellectuals will puff themselves up with their knowledge and without any logical verification of them will put into effect all the information available from science, which our agentur specialists have cunningly pieced together for the purpose of educating their minds in the direction we want.  Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for Darwinism.’  Atheistic freemasonry in the United States has picked up the resolution of Mizraim before long.  New Age magazine in its March 1922 issue stated that the kingdom of atheistic freemasonry will be established by evolution and the development of man himself.  As seen above, the false scientific image of evolution is a deception set in the 33rd degree atheist Masonic lodges.  Atheist masons openly admit that they will use the scientists and media which are under their control to present this deception as scientific, which even they find funny.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Fundamental Philosophy of Atheistic Freemasonry”

The Mimar Sinan journal published by the Turkish Great Freemasonry Lodge has openly discussed their mission to use Darwinism to overthrow religion and belief in God.  One article mentioned, “Today the only valid scientific theory accepted both by most civilized countries and underdeveloped ones remains to be Darwinism.  However, neither the church nor other religions have collapsed yet.  The legend of Adam and Eve is still being taught as religious teachings in holy books.”  In other words, it seems one of the main goals of modern Masons, besides convincing people of the ball-Earth and Big Bang, is to abolish the biblical creation story and replace it with their godless myth of blind chance evolution.  Just like Copernicus never claimed to have any new or special evidence for his heliocentric theory, Darwin never claimed to have any verifiable scientific evidence proving his evolution theory, yet here we are 150 years later, no closer to a proof of either, but with the vast majority of indoctrinated sheeple convinced they are monkey-men hanging from a spinning ball!

When we look at the Western media carefully, we frequently come across news dwelling on the theory of evolution.  Leading media organizations, and well-known and ‘respectable’ magazines periodically bring this subject up.  When their approach is examined, one gets the impression that this theory is an absolutely proven fact leaving no room for discussion.  Ordinary people reading this kind of news naturally start to think that the theory of evolution is a fact as certain as any law of mathematics.  They print headlines in big fonts: ‘According to Time magazine, a new fossil that completes the gap in the fossil chain has been found’; or ‘Nature indicates that scientists have shed light on the final issues of evolutionary theory.’  The finding of ‘the last missing link of the evolution chain’ means nothing because there is not a single thing proven about evolution.  In short, both the media and academic circles, which are at the disposal of anti-religionist power-centers, maintain an entirely evolutionist view and they impose this on society.  This imposition is so effective that it has in time turned evolution into an idea that is never to be rejected.  Denying evolution is seen as being contradictory to science and fundamental realities.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (210)

The information we have considered throughout this book has shown us that the theory of evolution has no scientific basis, and that, on the contrary, evolutionist claims conflict with scientific facts.  In other words, the force that keeps evolution alive is not science.  The theory of evolution is maintained by some ‘scientists,’ but behind it there is another influence at work.  This other influence is materialist philosophy.  Materialist philosophy is one of the oldest beliefs in the world, and assumes the existence of matter as its basic principle.  According to this view, matter has always existed, and everything that exists consists of matter.  This makes belief in a Creator impossible, of course, because if matter has always existed, and if everything consists of matter, then there can be no suprematerial Creator who created it.”  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (202)

The fact of the matter is evolution is, was, and always has been a foregone conclusion by people looking for any answer other than God.  When you metaphysically exclude the existence of an intelligent creative consciousness behind the creation of the material world, the only answer left is random happenstance!  Everything must be the result of coincidence, chance and circumstance once you have excluded the possibility of a supreme intelligent creator.  But no matter how diligently it is denied, the truth remains: you simply are not some cosmic accident, not the result of random happenstance, chance or coincidence, your eyes, your ears, your feelings, your life and consciousness are all the result of the most supremely intelligent design!  My previous book Spiritual Science is a 284-page refutation of materialist science and philosophy which proves far beyond any reasonable doubt that atheistic materialism is an invalid, untenable, destructive philosophy, and that consciousness and intelligence existed before and beyond all space, time and matter.

Malcolm Muggeridge, an atheist philosopher and supporter of evolution for 60 years finally admitted before his death that, “I myself am convinced that the theory of evolution, especially the extent to which it’s been applied, will be one of the great jokes in the history books in the future.  Posterity will marvel that so very flimsy and dubious an hypothesis could be accepted with the incredible credulity that it has.”

According to these professors, a number of simple chemical substances first came together and formed a protein - which is no more possible than a randomly scattered collection of letters coming together to form a poem.  Then, other coincidences led to the emergence of other proteins.  These then also combined by chance in an organized manner.  Not just proteins, but DNA, RNA, enzymes, hormones, and cell organelles, all of which are very complex structures within the cell, coincidentally happened to emerge and come together.  As a result of these billions of coincidences, the first cell came into being … If you put a carved stone or wooden idol in front of these people and told them, ‘Look, this idol created this room and everything in it’ they would say that was utterly stupid and refuse to believe it.  Yet despite that they declare the nonsense that ‘The unconscious process known as chance gradually brought this world and all the billions of wonderful living things in it into being’ to be the greatest scientific explanation.  In short, these people regard chance as a god, and claim that it is intelligent, conscious and powerful enough to create living things and all the sensitive balances in the universe.  -Harun Yahya, “The Evolution Deceit” (32)

Support independent publishing: Buy this book on Lulu.

Buy The Flat Earth Conspiracy 252-Page Paperback, eBook, or ePub


Anonymous said...

Another superb article. Nothing but common sense, logical, truly "scientific" thinking and reasoning. Bravo again, Eric, and looking forward to whatever is next.

Anonymous said...

what do you think of these videos. Maybe you've seen them. I think its hard to deny evolution. There's always been a war between society and science.

Sudhakar said...


Rayn Gryphon said...

Such an excellent piece of writing. People have come to depend upon and trust you, Eric.

Technically speaking, the ball Earth and evolutionary theory are easy targets. Psychologically and socially, they are daunting. You are to be commended on both counts, as the technical and psychological prohibitions are veritably inextricable.

That is something to take very seriously.

For every step forward in your craft, never forget to take several steps forward in your self-awareness.

That is my message to you.

Whatever you may wish to say about me, don't insult the intelligence of those who have come to depend upon you.


Jane Barrash said...

Wonderful evidence! However it is set up as a false choice between science and religion when in fact there is vast evidence from quantum physics, neuroscience, biology, biochemistry, math, astrophysics, cosmology, psychology, and psychiatry that there is an underlying/pre-existing intelligence that does not require a personified Deity(though such is not necessarily precluded). There can be intelligence in the universe without a Supreme intelligent Being and I have not heard religious people offer that option. We have evidence for consciousness being that unifying, transcendent, organizing principle I thoroughly appreciate your hard work and beautiful site...I hope you will visit ours!

Darriun18 said...

In my research Evolution is partially true. I dont believe humans evolved from animals, but I do believe we devolved into a primitive state based on our karma. Eyver life form on this planet has been here from the beginning of creation. Plant life and animal life is older than human life but humans didnt come from primates. There isnt enough evidence to say humans came from apes, most of the evolution theory came out of Europe during the 16 or 17 century. Darwin only created that theory to support his racist ideas and survival of the fittest agenda by saying blacks evolved from apes then whites evolved from blacks. I dont think any creature like the Neanderthal existed. If primitive people and Neanderthal existed then aliens exist too lol. But there isnt enough evidence to support the claim human came from apes. No ancient civilization or any indigenous culture talked about evolution or the big bang. Creation stories and metaphysical teachings existed for along time, evolution is a new age theory. Now I do believe in spiritual evolution or mental transformation based on ones awarenes. Its hard to trust anything science says today cause they lie about flat earth, they lied about outer space and dinosaurs existing. Everything is just a theory till proven a fact. If we did have a golden spiritual age were duality didnt exist then we devolved, technology just helped us survive the damage we did to the planet that resulted in major changes. I believe everything is god but has devolved into what we are today. Man is still primitive because of his animal nature and lust for power over the world. Creation is just the manifestation of spirit falling into matter, from its highest state of being to its lower state. Some physical transformations In humans are real like dna changes , but never will you see a monkey become a human

Ross said...

When discussing evolution theory, I think you have to consider three distinct aspects. The first is evident, we can see it occurring at a microbial level in virtually real time. Higher up the scale, the brown moth is a good example. A native of northern England its eponymous colour offered it good camouflage when resting on the bark of a tree. Then, from the mid 18th c industrialisation happened, and the air became increasingly full of smuts and particulate from coal burning.Trees in this environment started to darken, and finally to blacken. The lighter brown moths became increasingly vulnerable in this time, so the darker varieties had better chance of survival and thus bred, and after a few decades the brown moth became black. Time moved on, the dark satanic mills closed and slowly the air cleared`and the tree bark reverted to its natural brown colour.The moth followed and slowly reverted to brown too. QED evolution in action.
The second aspect is more difficult. To suggest that an octopus and a hedgehog, or a blackberry bush and a blue whale have a common ancestor seems absurd, counter to common sense. The orthodox answer I suppose would be trillions of genes and billions of years and millions of environments, but it is a moot point in my view. To believe it requires a leap of faith (splutter but but but it's science!). Personally I'm by no means convinced that over the 40, 60 or 200 thousand years (take your pick) since 'man left Africa' black Africans 'evolved' into the distinct racial genotypes, but I wouldn't want to be accused of hate speech!
As for the third element, the origin of life, as Eric points out is completely untouched by evolutionary theory. Even if you consider amino acids to be 'building blocks of life' (what a tiresome cliché that phrase has become) they are most certainly not 'life'. The fundamental point of progeny is something else entirely, something science has no answer for so ignores. Here's a little game you can play with a doctrinal scientist to illustrate the point. Consider a goldfish swimming around a bowl. Ask modern science to describe the phenomenon and it would be able to do a very comprehensive job. Biologists could explain anatomy and behaviour, biochemists the chemical and electrical processes occurring, a taxonomist its relationship to the rest of the animal kingdom and so on - it could even be explained why the fish appears 'gold' to the human eye. It is a remarkable collection of knowledge and a testimony to man's intelligence.
Then take a net, catch the fish and leave it on the table (please don't do this at home!). It will flap about a bit, then fairly quickly go still. Ask the scientist what has happened and they will reply 'it has died'. But what does that mean? Moments before it was alive, animate and now it is not. Clearly an energy was present but no longer is. The scientist will point to the biochemical processes previous, but every single molecule of the fish is still there, even if you put it back in the water it will remain dead. So the critical questions are 1) what was that energy driving those processes; 2) where has it now gone; and not forgetting 3) where did it come from in the first place? The Chinese have understood about 'qi' for millennia, and the Indians likewise with 'prana', but the modern western scientist will (in my experience) struggle to even frame the question. It was like asking a person blind from birth to describe a colour, no frame of reference. Something as utterly fundamental as life force which is present both within us and all around us, is absent from the scientific narrative because current scientific orthodoxy cannot even comprehend it.
As to the answer to those three questions… this post is long enough already! Loving this site Eric, thank you for it, as well as all the intelligent comments herein.

Lonna said...

Adaptation is NOT evolution. A bird species whose beak changes in different geography is still a BIRD. It has only adapted to its environment - another one of God's genius at work. A bird has never morphed into a lizard or visa versa. When God said He made every KIND of animal and creepy crawly in the world, that's exactly what He meant. One kind. These same kinds of animals were the ones He chose to board Noah's ark. After the Flood, it took 300 hundred years or so until the continents began to drift apart, so that is plenty of time for all the animals to find their appropriate habitats and become separated from each other, ADAPTING to their unique environments. Not to mention us human beings. Neanderthal man was real, but he was never more than an odd-looking human. Why was he odd looking? Because pre-Flood people were permitted to live hundreds of years. God said that after the Flood, man would live no more than 120 years. The reason scientists have such a "difficult" time determining ape bones from human bones is because of the skull. The brow bone of the human skull keeps growing as we age, so someone Methuselah's age (over 900-years-old) would look brooding and ape-like. Imagine what their spines would have gone through! And the female pelvis... how long until menopause? 300? Good grief! Death in a fallen world is truly a mercy!

On the subject of why evolution is still taught in our schools as scientific fact, is political and has NOTHING to do with science. During the space race between the US and Russia, we were losing and Eisenhower wanted to know why. Well, it turns out that in Russia, they were teaching evolution in their schools, so that's when we started oozing Creationism out and replacing it with far-fetched, anti-God propaganda. You know, evolution. Like this article says, you cannot get something from nothing. That's basic physics and yet our children are being told otherwise on tax-payer money? They don't even get a good overview of a differing opinion when they enter our universities either! It's ludicrous how much we've been lied to as a people. Jesus is the ONLY light in this world and the path to salvation is narrow for a reason. There are far too many lies around us and the truth is a thin line in the midst of it. Once you find it, it truly sets your heart and mind free. God bless!

Lonna said...

Ross - The last part of your comment reminded me of the movie Temple Grandin!

Unknown said...

Ha, ha, ha...!!! People still believe in the "Big Bang???" I thought everyone knew this is nothing more than a "JOKE...!!!" It was published in the late 60's (sorry, so long ago I forget the date) in Scientific a JOKE!!!

The "Big Bang" is a JOKE!

Get over it people!

Kevin said...

If existence is designed, then who is/are the designer(s)? And why is there no record of it communicating with its creation?
I dont except religion as atheism, but there must be overwhelming evidence that most people will accept as truth or are most accepting this and that without properly realistic thinking? Last thing; it is a failure of the designer to let suffering of life pass on without any form of assistance. I think i will never know, and i hope others will to liberate themselves and their environment.
Good luck with your quest Eric.

Ross said...

If it was a 'big bang', what was before that? If it was God, what created him? Who designed the designer? However you look at it, there is always that one more question, something beyond the veil. There is no simple answer in material terms, it is in metaphysics, or rather in the mystical you must seek. There are paths requiring lengthy spiritual discipline and devotion, and there are relative short-cuts - the way of the shaman. For consciousness to transcend the illusion of material existence, to simply exist in a spiritual plane, out of time, out of place, just being. I have done this, have understood, but cannot communicate that understanding because it is beyond explanation. I can only say that I understand that I cannot understand, or as Lao Tse put it rather more elegantly: "The name that can be named is not the Name."

Anonymous said...


...a Bang Bang, from a different angle!

Unknown said...

A "Nu" to you Eric. Thank you for dedicating so much of our time to helping the education of the flat Earth.

I have only recently started to research the flat Earth and I have many questions, as I am sure you can imagine. One such question is abut the changes of day light both on the outer rim of the Flat Earth and the inner circle, but never in the middle of the disc. Is there something already or can I propose my own theory? It would be great if you had a video.

Anyhow, I also wanted to criticize this article. Of curse we know Evolution to be real, it is an observed fact. I find it disheartening that so many people that are interested in the flat Earth cannot simply focus on that alone! Disputing Evolution, I'm sorry to say, makes this all look ridiculous. I can endorse the flat Earth believe, but to say Evolution isn't real is offending intelligence. Only the most uneducated Americans hold that believe and they are what holds civilization back, preventing us all from living in a fairer, better and more spiritual society.

Consider that Evolution is both observed and that unlike the flat Earth, there is no alternative. Where else does all the variety of species come from?!

nyse said...

How can one reconcile belief in mainstream evolution and the flat earth? These seem totally incongruent and mutually exclusive to me.

Of course there is evolution in the sense that new species are created over time, or, for e.g. the manner in which different "races" developed -- if one wants to call this evolution, fine.

But the fact is, when most refer to "evolution" they are referring to the "big-bang-cosmology,-we-came-from-sea-sludge-and-evolved-into-men" theory, which is not observable, etc. (see article above).

Anonymous said...

Please please watch the movie pattens of evidence! I think you would find it quite interesting. Keep up the good work. Keep truth seeking my friend

Anonymous said...

Dear Eric,

I like your well-elaborated posts.
My biggest question I keep pondering on is the following:
Can a flat earth, intelligent design/God and a wide universe go hand in hand or are they somehow mutually exclusive?

If the earth is flat, is there a wider universe outside of the dome or is everything about ETs etc faked as well by NASA?

Thank you,

Unknown said...

Thanks again Eric. As usual, this is a well researched and informative article exposing the deliberate LIE of the "Big Bang" and evolution. Just one change I would make: "The likelihood of the spontaneous formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with 40,000 zeros after it …" I would change this to: "The likelihood of the spontaneous formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with AN INFINITE NUMBER OF zeros after it …"