Saturday, April 25, 2015

Eric Dubay Flat Earth Interviews











The oldest and largest secret society in existence has a secret so huge and well-hidden, so contrary to what we have been taught to believe, that its exposure threatens to not only completely and single-handedly crush their New World Order "United Nations" but to radically reshape the entirety of modern academia, universities, the mainstream / alternative medias, all the world's governments, space agencies, and the very Earth beneath our feet: http://ifers.boards.net

22 comments:

J. Lee said...

A wonderfully eloquent explanation of the Biggest Lie and Deception in the past 500 years. Nice job Eric.

Starts at 49:51
"Our eyes and ears tell us the Earth is flat and motionless, everything in the sky revolves around us but when we cease to believe our own eyes and experience we have to we have to prostrate ourselves at the feet of the of the very pseudo scientists who are blinding us treat them as experts.

Astronomical priests who have special knowledge only they can access like the Hubble telescope.

So by brainwashing us of something so gigantic and fundamental it actually makes every other kind of lesser indoctrination a piece a cake, earth being the flat earth center of the universe of which everything else and the heavens revolve, gives special importance and significance not only to earth but to us humans, the most intelligent of the designers design.

By turning earth into a spinning, thrown around the Sun, shot into infinite space from a God-less big bang, they turned humanity into a random meaningless, purposeless accident of a blind dumb universe.

So it’s like trauma based mind control beating the divinity out of us with their mental manipulations.
Now people are always asking us “why do they do this?”, Well other than the obvious profit margin motive, NASA being the biggest black hole, big budget in existence, sucking in more than $30 Billion in tax payer dollars for the fake Moon landing alone, and nowadays hundreds of billions of dollars, not just NASA but RASA, and all the other fake space organizations around the world giving CGI Images costing hundreds of billions of dollars.

So this modern atheistic, Big Bang, heliocentric globe earth, chance evolution, paradigm spiritually controls humanity by removing God or any sort of intelligent design from the mind and replaces purposeful divine creation with haphazard random cosmic coincidence.

And so by removing Earth from the motionless center of the universe these Masons have moved us physically and metaphysically from a place of supreme importance to one of complete nihilistic indifference.

If the Earth is the center of the Universe then the ideas of God creation and a purpose for human existence are resplendent, but if the Earth is just one of billions of planets revolving around billions of stars and billions of galaxies then the ideas of God creations and a specific purpose of for Earth and human existence become highly implausible.

By surreptitiously indoctrinating us into their scientific materialist sun worship, not only do we lose faith beyond the material we gain absolute faith in materiality, superficiality, social status, selfishness, hedonism and consumerism.

If there is no God and everyone is just an accident then all that matters is me, me, me. So they’ve turned Madonna, the Mother of God into the material girl living in a material world.

Their rich powerful corporations and slick sun cult logos sell us idol to worship to slowly taking over the world while we tacitly take over the world while we believe their science, vote for their politicians, buy their products, listen to their music, watching their movies, all sacrificing our souls to the altar of materialism.

It’s a big deception!"

Anonymous said...

Eric,
I am currently reading the "Flat Earth Conspiracy". If you look at a flat earth map and a regular map, there is a rather large distance variation between Djibouti to Yemen. Back in 2007, a bridge was proposed to span a length of 3.1 miles but I could not find any other information following the announcement. I then tempted to find ferry information from any of the closest points. I could not.(But I did find many people looking for ferry information from Djibouti to Yemen. It seems like this would be a point on the map that might be easily refuted if the popular map was doctored. What do you think? thanks, Sam

Michael Luder said...

Hi Eric

Thought you might like these links, they certainly piqued my interest..

First we have the highly newsworthy "Fans send x wing into space.."

I'm not sure how high they go, but it says stratosphere..

http://www.theverge.com/2015/4/27/8502747/fans-send-x-wing-into-space

Clearly no curvature.

Lastly, we have a story titled "Jumping of the edge of the world: Adrenalin junkie films group jump out of the plane upside down that shows off the curve of the earth".

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2887504/Jumping-edge-world-Adrenalin-junkie-films-group-jump-plane-upside-shows-curve-earth.html

This is clearly at a much lower altitude, plain to see.

Now I'm confused. The only curve shown here is curving in the wrong direction. And everyone knows "Go Pros" have fisheye lens', don't they..?

Most interesting.

I continue to reserve judgement in a cautious fashion but seeing is believing.. with an intelligent, open mind.. there's no trickery in the videos, its just the erroneous title, tis all.

Peace and respect
Michael

Jerome said...

It's amazing that the biggest lie is actually one of the easiest to disprove. Between the lighthouse distances etc., and the fact that airplanes are not constantly having to nose down as they travel across the earth is easily verifiable.

I have run the gamut of "conspiracy theories" to the point that it became mundane because I know the script after 1000's of hours of reading and researching.
The flat earth is kinda the grand daddy of them all, and I feel is very close to the truth. The ramifications of this revelation are almost inestimable.

I believe this world, exactly as it is today is exactly how it is meant to be. It is meant to be very difficult, and I think we are being graded on how we react.

You are very eloquent and patient in your responses in the interviews, and support your claims well. Thank you for all you have done and continue to do. God bless you my friend.

Anonymous said...

===Quoted===
I believe this world, exactly as it is today is exactly how it is meant to be. It is meant to be very difficult, and I think we are being graded on how we react.
===Unquoted===

Big agree!
I think this is basically is the whole idea of life. It is like an examination. We are being graded for some unknown reason.
We only know the results after life exam finishes...

Anonymous said...

Okay, so the earth is being run by lying psychopaths. Let's, for the moment, assume that. Where does that leave most of us? Oh, yes, the lone recyclers up against the armies of chaos and deception who have dismantled most of the systems of truth and justice. It's no wonder Hollywierd is awash in vigilantism type themes . Or, we can say their new system of justice is the surveillance police state; either way, the sham is upon us.
And what about the primal author? Weak? ineffectual? It just wasn't quite able to get the design right, or keep order once the design was implemented! Or perhaps it's a vast ocean of impersonal consciousness in which case the average person is basically hooped anyway and has real no significance is any grand scheme of things. Or not! Perhaps there is a sovereign that has personage and has and has always had complete authority. Perhaps there are right and left hand protocols in place that cover every aspect of life on this earth.
A war on heaven? All part of the schemes of the agents of chaos and deception.
BTW: the left hand of ___ is a bitch!

Anonymous said...

Eric, please explain the moon phases to me. How could it be if the earth was flat and the sun is not the center of our solar system?

globalweimar said...

Eric I am struggling with the no weather satellite idea. What are your thoughts, how could that work? Seems unlikely that the whole meteorological community would be masons lying to everyone. This is the first really big big problem I've contacted on...meteorites are a smaller but related issue.
Also I recommend you all check out astronot @StationCDRkelly on twitter for a laugh. Uses a masonic hand signal in his avatar and the recent picture of earth is so badly photocopied it sems almost on purpose to get a reaction

Eric Dubay said...

Thanks for the comments everyone! :) Sam, you'll find much larger discrepancies than that for the ball-Earth model in the book. All photographic curvature is just the result of lens distortion and a moving/tilting camera, Michael. Anon, the Moon's phases are a natural cycle of the Moon which shines with its own unique light. Check out the Sun, Moon, Stars and Planets section of the forum for more info. GlobalWeimar, weather "satellites" are explained at 18 mins of my Satellite Hoax video. We are discussing Meteorites on the forum now. Peace!

Bad-Clown said...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTVsDrf1CUY

Rahsaan Motley said...

Good interviews Eric, seems pretty much that Flat Earth has more evidence than a so called ball earth. It never made since to me with NASA and while most of USA's population is brainwashed into this ball earth and big bang universe. These scientists always use made up theories and claim them as facts. Science today is just another religion following made up ideas. All these governments around the world togeather with the Vatican and the worlds Elite Banker Families has kept us in darkness for over 500 years. These new age movements are really keeping people in the dark. Im glad i found you site 5 years ago after nearly being brainwashed by new age mythology like NASA. Most people today are waking up to the lies about government and the banker familes ruling over everyone but still believe the earth is round. I just seen another stupid theory that NASA can see up to 100 different galaxies lol. They also said theres no center in each universe.

Anonymous said...

I have stood on the shore and watched a boat sail away. It disappeared from the bottom up. I wondered why and realised it was because of the curvature of the earth. I kept watching and saw a boat appear from the top down as it came towards the shore. If the earth was flat shouldn't boats remain fully in view and get smaller and smaller until they become a dot on the horizon.

Anonymous said...

Hi, Eric. If evolution was a fraud, why are there animals like the kangoroo and koala? Which have distinguished themselves since they are alienated/isolated from the rest of the world. You can't crossbreed the koala or the kangoroo with something else, and produce offsprings.

Anonymous said...

@anonymous, regarding EVOLUTION: There are a great many bizarre and unexplained aspects in "evolution" and "darwinism", both of which have been shown to be just theories and false ones at that--. Anyone who really researches evolution discovers that it is highly, highly flawed. You think kangaroos and koalas are odd? Consider the cheetah, or domesticated plants, which can't be satisfactorily explained by evolution. Not to mention, flowers--Darwin couldn't even explain flowers, they baffled him. There are astronomers who speak out, because what they perceive is a universe that seems to run more by design--NOT by chance. As well, the billions-long timeline established for evolution to supposedly have occurred, is impractical, especially in regard to eukaryotes and prokaryotes, and the "explanation" for the Cambrian explosion is weak, not to mention the ridiculous man is ape nonsense, which Lloyd Pye among others, thoroughly ripped apart. Pye believed that aliens made life on earth--I do not, but he still offered incredible information about evolution that should be read. Read the book by Richard Milton as well, on the Darwin lie--for instance, the so-called pre-human Lucy was really just an ape, but they lie to this day, to maintain Darwinism and promote atheism and nihilism. Scientists today who study cells are so stunned by cellular mechanisms and complexity, that it defies an evolutionary explanation, watch Ben Stein's documentary, very interesting. Look, I'm actually an atheist, but I do not believe in evolution, and I believe the earth is flat, so... I don't understand exactly what is going on, but when I research things that are considered to be mainstream "truths", these "truths" often disintegrate when analyzed.

Anonymous said...

2 questions:
If the moon, sun, and other planets are all spherical and demonstrably spinning, why and how is the earth flat?

What is the point in many thousands of people lying about it?

Thank you for your answers in advance,

Anonymous said...

interesting google doodle
https://www.google.co.uk/logos/doodles/2015/inge-lehmanns-127th-birthday-5712482031108096-hp.gif

j said...

How do you explain weather with the flat earth model? Thank you-J

Anonymous said...

A couple of MIT students "proving" the Coriolis Effect.

http://video.mit.edu/watch/the-coriolis-effect-4407/

Seriously though, I have never heard of or seen on "satellite" maps a storm rotating clockwise in the Northern Hemisphere. Are these images a lie as well? What accounts for the rotation of low pressure systems in the flat earth model, and why do the low pressures in the Northern "hemisphere" rotate opposite those in the Southern (if indeed they do)?

Eric Dubay said...

Anon, Another favorite “proof” of ball-Earthers is the appearance from an observer on shore of ships’ hulls being obfuscated by the water and disappearing from view when sailing away towards the horizon. Their claim is that ship’s hulls disappear before their mast-heads because the ship is beginning its declination around the convex curvature of the ball-Earth. Once again, however, their hasty conclusion is drawn from a faulty premise, namely that only on a ball-Earth can this phenomenon occur. The fact of the matter is that the Law of Perspective on plane surfaces dictates and necessitates the exact same occurrence. For example a girl wearing a dress walking away towards the horizon will appear to sink into the Earth the farther away she walks. Her feet will disappear from view first and the distance between the ground and the bottom of her dress will gradually diminish until after about half a mile it seems like her dress is touching the ground as she walks on invisible legs. The same happens with cars speeding away, the axles gradually get lower and the wheels vanish until it appears as if the car is gliding along its body. Such is the case on plane surfaces, the lowest parts of objects receding from a given point of observation necessarily disappear before the highest.

“This law of Perspective meets us on every hand; and cannot be gainsaid. If, in a straight line, we look at a frozen lake from a certain distance, we shall observe people who appear to be skating on their knees, but, if we approach sufficiently near, we shall see them performing graceful motions on their feet. Farther, if we look through a straight tunnel, we shall notice that the roof and the roadway below converge to a point of light at the end. It is the same law which makes the hills sink, to the horizon, as the observer recedes, which explains how the ship's hull disappears in the offing. I would also remark that when the sea is undisturbed by waves, the hull can be restored to sight by the aid of a good telescope long after it has disappeared from the naked eye, thus proving that the ship had not gone down behind the watery hill of a convex globe, but is still sailing on the level of a Plane sea.” -David Wardlaw Scott, “Terra Firma” (75)

Not only is the disappearance of ship’s hulls explained by the Law of Perspective, it is proven undeniably true with the aid of a good telescope. If you watch a ship sailing away into the horizon with the naked eye until its hull has completely disappeared from view under the supposed “curvature of the Earth,” then look through a telescope, you will notice the entire ship quickly zooms back into view, hull and all, proving that the disappearance was caused by the Law of Perspective, and not by a wall of curved water!

“On any frozen lake or canal, notably on the ‘Bedford Canal,’ in the county of Cambridge, in winter and on a clear day, skaters may be observed several miles away, seeming to glide along upon limbs without feet--skates and boots quite invisible to the unaided eye, but distinctly visible through a good telescope. But even on the sea, when the water is very calm, if a vessel is observed until it is just ‘hull down,’ a powerful telescope turned upon it will restore the hull to sight. From which it must be concluded that the lower part of a receding ship disappears through the influence of perspective, and not from sinking behind the summit of a convex surface.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (216)

Eric Dubay said...

Also see here starting at 20:30: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccBfaRfuU2c

Second Anon, an intelligent designer can design whatever it wants wherever it wants, so such considerations are irrelevant... the only question you should be asking is how the hell could koalas, kangaroos, humans and everything else NOT be intelligently designed, and just haphazardly evolved by random physical coincidences?

The other Anons, see the following IFERS threads:

http://ifers.boards.net/threads/recent/36
http://ifers.boards.net/threads/recent/18

Vihaan Kumar said...

can you please send me the link to 'asbestos head' book. The link on the website 'lulu' is not working

Wayne Webster said...

Hi Eric,

I love your yoga and martial arts background and your considerable truther reseach and written and video work on various truther topics. That coupled with the fact that I find you the most articulate, knowledgable, and convincing of all the Flat Earthers I have so far encountered in my first two months of entertaining the possibility of flat earth theory, leads me to one question for you, that I never hear addressed and that has been driving me crazy, because it is never discussed and it seems so obvious and simple.

At around 1:20 in this Anarchist interview, you are talking about the prohibition against explorers going to Antarctica to traverse or circumnavigate this alleged continent. But why are you only playing into their lie, that they are protecting against detection in the one spot where their human presence is greatest, when from the FE perspective, Antarctica is just the southern end, the most populated portion of a continuous ice barrier circling the flat earth disc, with an inner perimeter of 25,000 miles in circumferance.

The obvious question is: why not simply head straight due west in a ship or airplane from say, California, and not pay any attention to the latitude lines, crossing over them, heading straight as an arrow for the inner perimerter ice barrier that should be encountered roughly a quarter of the way around the circumferance of the perimeter of the earth, some 6 to 7 thousand miles away from Antarctica where all the UN warships are located, and all the prohibitions against exploration are enforced?

Instead of trying to debunk Antarctica, why not try to prove the ice barrier perimeter, bunk the ice barrier by reaching it, since it can be reached going any direction? FEers seen to only talk about Antarctica in the Globalist's terms? The only answer I can imagine is that the UN forces monitor the whole 25,000 miles of the perimeter and would turn back or shoot out of the air or water any airplane or ship before it reached the ice barrier?

I remember one FE video saying the last man to try to sail around to around Antarctica was Capt. Cook, and it took him four years, and he logged 62,000 miles, meaning he had actually circumnavigated the earths ice perimeter.

But then thinking about this claim, with only a frozen coast line off to his side, how could Cooke have survived without fruit or vegetables and on nothing but fish for four years?

It seems obvious to me that with the Perimeter literally lying in all directions, getting their should be pretty easy? Why is this topic never mentioned, let alone this voyage in the IFERS planning stages?

Surely the UN cannot control all 25,000 miles of the perimeter, or can they? But if they do, how could they justify preventing explorers going to a place that doesn't exist on ttheir globle earth?

Wayne Webster