Monday, February 15, 2016

Sun and Moon Equal Divine Balanced Opposites




When you look up at the Sun and Moon you see two equally-sized equidistant circles tracing similar paths at similar speeds around a flat, stationary Earth.  The “experts” at NASA, however, claim your common sense every day experience is false on all counts!  To begin with, they say the Earth is not flat but a big ball; not stationary but spinning around 19 miles per second; they say the Sun does not revolve around the Earth as it appears, but Earth revolves around the Sun; the Moon, on the other hand, does revolve around the Earth, though not East to West as it appears, rather West to East; and the Sun is actually 400 times larger than the Moon and 400 times farther away!  That’s right, you can clearly see they are the same size and distance, you can see the Earth is flat, you can feel the Earth is stationary, but according to the gospel of modern astronomy, you are wrong and a simpleton worthy of endless ridicule if you dare to believe your own eyes and experience! 

With haughty arrogance the nearest hypnotized heliocentrist will then inform you that the Sun is 865,374 miles in diameter and 92,955,807 miles from the Earth, the Moon is 2,159 miles in diameter and 238,900 miles from Earth, and those just happen to be the EXACT diameters and distances necessary for a viewer from Earth to falsely perceive them as being the same size!  So, you see, silly Flat-Earther, it is all an illusion and the apparent equanimity of our day and night luminaries in the sky results from mere coincidental parallax perspective!  The Sun does not revolve around the Earth as it appears; rather the Earth spins 1,038 mph under your feet and revolves 67,108 mph around the Sun!  The Moon does indeed revolve around the Earth, but not as it appears!  Though it seems to move East to West just like the Sun and everything else in the heavens, the Moon actually spins West to East at 10.3 mph while orbiting Earth at 2,288 mph, which combined with the Earth’s 1,038mph spin and 67,108 mph orbit around the Sun coincidentally results in all motions perfectly cancelling out making the Moon seem to move across the heavens with similar path and similar speed as the Sun while always only showing us one side of its surface, and perpetually hiding its “dark side.”

The Moon presented a special math problem for the construction of the heliocentricity model. The only way to make the Moon fit in with the other assumptions was to reverse its direction from that of what everyone who has ever lived has seen it go. The math model couldn’t just stop the Moon like it did the Sun, that wouldn’t work. And it couldn’t let it continue to go East to West as we see it go, either at the same speed or at a different speed. The only option was to reverse its observed East to West direction and change its speed from about 64,000 miles an hour to about 2,200 miles an hour. This reversal, along with the change in speed, were unavoidable assumptions that needed to be adopted if the model was to have any chance of mimicking reality.” -Bernard Brauer

They want you to believe that the Moon's rotation is perfectly synchronized with its orbit so that's why we only ever see one side of the Moon, rather than conclude the obvious - that the Moon is simply NOT rotating. Moreover, they had to slow down the Moon's speed by 58,870 mph AND reverse its direction to West-East to successfully sell their phony heliocentricity system to a gullible public. I don't think there is one person in many, many thousands - regardless of education - who knows that the Copernican Model had to turn the Moon's observable direction around and give it a new speed to accommodate the phases and eclipses.” -Marshall Hall

Astronomers tell us that the Moon goes round the Earth in about 28 days. Well, we may see her making her journey round every day, if we make use of our eyes and these are about the best things we have to use. The Moon falls behind in her daily motion as compared with that of the Sun to the extent of one revolution in the time specified; but that is not making a revolution. Failing to go as fast as other bodies go in one direction does not constitute a going round in the opposite one - as the astronomers would have us believe! And, since all this absurdity has been rendered necessary for no other purpose than to help other absurdities along, it is clear that the astronomers are on the wrong track.”  -William Carpenter, “100 Proofs the Earth is Not a Globe” (82)

There are several theories about the relative size and distance of the Sun and Moon all with their points of evidence and points of contention.  Flat-Earthers throughout the ages have used sextants and plane trigonometry attempting to make such calculations, usually concluding the Sun and Moon both to be only about 32 miles in diameter and less than a few thousand miles from Earth.  Perhaps the least plausible model, certainly the most exaggerated and imaginative, is the reigning heliocentric theory claiming the Sun to be a whopping 865,374 miles in diameter, 92,955,807 miles from the Earth, and the Moon  2,159 miles in diameter, 238,900 miles from the Earth. 

Heliocentrists’ astronomical figures always sound perfectly precise, but they have historically been notorious for regularly and drastically changing them to suit their various models.  For instance, in his time Copernicus calculated the Sun’s distance from Earth to be 3,391,200 miles.  The next century Johannes Kepler decided it was actually 12,376,800 miles away.  Issac Newton once said, “It matters not whether we reckon it 28 or 54 million miles distant for either would do just as well!”  How scientific!?  Benjamin Martin calculated between 81 and 82 million miles, Thomas Dilworth claimed 93,726,900 miles, John Hind stated positively 95,298,260 miles, Benjamin Gould said more than 96 million miles, and Christian Mayer thought it was more than 104 million!

As the sun, according to ‘science’ may be anything from 3 to 104 million miles away, there is plenty of ‘space’ to choose from.  It is like the showman and the child.  You pay your money - for various astronomical works - and you take your choice as to what distance you wish the sun to be.  If you are a modest person, go in for a few millions; but if you wish to be ‘very scientific’ and to be ‘mathematically certain’ of your figures, then I advise you to make your choice somewhere about a hundred millions.  You will at least have plenty of ‘space’ to retreat into, should the next calculation be against the figures of your choice.  You can always add a few millions to ‘keep up with the times,’ or take off as many as may be required to adjust the distance to the ‘very latest’ accurate column of figures.  Talk about ridicule, the whole of modern astronomy is like a farcical comedy - full of surprises.  One never knows what monstrous or ludicrous absurdity may come forth next.  You must not apply the ordinary rules of common-sense to astronomical guesswork.  No, the thing would fall to pieces if you did.”  -Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (115)

Regiments of figures are paraded with all the learned jargon for which science is famous, but one might as well look at the changing clouds in the sky and seek for certainty there, as to expect to get it from the propounders of modern astronomy.  But is there no means of testing these ever-changing never-stable speculations and bringing them to the scrutiny of the hard logic of fact?  Indeed there is.  The distance of the sun can be measured with much precision, the same way as a tree or a house, or church steeple is measured, by plane triangulation.  It is the principle on which a house is built, a table made or a man-of-war constructed … The sun is always somewhere between the tropics of Cancer and Capricorn, a distance admitted to be less than 3,000 miles; how then can the sun if it be so many thousand miles in diameter, squeeze itself into a space of about 3,000 miles only?  But look at the distance, say the professors!  We have already done that and not one of the wise men we have so often challenged, has ever attempted to refute the principle on which we measure the sun’s distance … If the navigator neglects to apply the sun’s semi-diameter to his observation at sea, he is 16 nautical miles out in calculating the position his ship is in.  A minute of arc on the sextant represents a nautical mile, and if the semi-diameter be 16 miles, the diameter is of course 32 miles.  And as measured by the sextant, the sun’s diameter is 32 minutes of arc, that is 32 nautical miles in diameter.  Let him disprove this who can.  If ever disproof is attempted, it will be a literary curiosity, well worth framing.”  -Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (114-120)

Measuring with sextants and calculating with plane trigonometry both the Sun and Moon figure to be only about 32 miles in diameter and approximately 3,000 miles away.  As shown last chapter, the Moon is actually a semi-transparent luminary and not the solid, spherical, desert planet that NASA would have us believe.  In fact, it is likely that both the Sun and Moon are not densely physical at all and are simply luminous flat discs able to pass by/through one another during eclipses.

The results of recent research prove that the heavenly luminaries are not Worlds, but lights, and should cause all men who have been led to accept as proven Copernicus’ theory of the motions of the Earth, to reconsider this subject.”  -E. Eschini, “Foundations of Many Generations” (3)

The satellites of the earth are not masses of matter. They are luminous and transparent discs without substance. The moon, in particular, conveys the impression of being an ethereal manifestation, and the uncertain and illusive character which is usually associated with this satellite results precisely from its immaterial nature. It was recognized from the earliest times that the satellites of the earth, particularly the sun and the moon, were not solid, opaque bodies. They were first, until Aristotle, considered to be souls or spirits, which does not imply a physical nature. To the ancients, they were simply lights, and they gave the sun and the moon a very apt name. They called them luminaries.  -Gabrielle Henriet, “Heaven and Earth” (34-36)

In the Flat-Earth model, the Sun and Moon luminaries revolve around the Earth once every 24 hours illuminating like spotlights the areas over which they pass.  The Sun’s annual journey from tropic to tropic, solstice to solstice, is what determines the length and character of days, nights and seasons.  This is why equatorial regions experience almost year-round summer and heat while higher latitudes North and especially South experience more distinct seasons with harsh winters.  

The heliocentric model claims seasons change based on the ball-Earth’s alleged “axial tilt” and “elliptical orbit” around the Sun.  Their flawed current model even places us closest to the Sun (91,400,000 miles) in January when its actually winter, and farthest from the Sun (94,500,000 miles) in July when its actually summer throughout much of the Earth.  They say due to the ball-Earth’s tilt, different places receive different amounts of direct sunlight and that is what produces the seasonal and temperature changes.  This makes little sense, however, because if the Sun’s heat travels over ninety million miles to reach the ball-Earth, how could a slight tilt, a mere few thousand miles maximum, negate the Sun’s ninety million mile journey, giving us simultaneous tropical summers and Antarctic winters?

The earth is a stretched-out structure, which diverges from the central north in all directions towards the south.  The equator, being midway between the north center and the southern circumference, divides the course of the sun into north and south declination.  The longest circle round the world which the sun makes, is when it has reached its greatest southern declination.  Gradually going northwards the circle is contracted.  In about three months after the southern extremity of its path has been reached, the sun makes a circle round the equator.  Still pursuing a northerly course as it goes round and above the world, in another three months the greatest northern declination is reached, when the sun again begins to go towards the south.  In north latitudes, when the sun is going north, it rises earlier each day, is higher at noon and sets later; while in southern latitudes at the same time, the sun as a matter of course rises later, reaches a lesser altitude at noon and sets earlier.  In northern latitudes during the southern summer, say from September to December, the sun rises later each day, is lower at noon and sets earlier; while in the south he rises earlier, reaches a higher altitude at noon, and sets later each day.  This movement round the earth daily is the cause of the alternations of day and night; while his northerly and southerly courses produce the seasons.  When the sun is south of the equator it is summer in the south and winter in the north; and vice versa.  The fact of the alternation of the seasons flatly contradicts the Newtonian delusion that the earth revolves in an orbit round the sun.  It is said that summer is caused by the earth being nearest the sun, and winter by its being farthest from the sun.  But if the reader will follow the argument in any text book he will see that according to the theory, when the earth is nearest the sun there must be summer in both northern and southern latitudes; and in like manner when it is farthest from the sun, it must be winter all over the earth at the same time, because the whole of the globe-earth would then be farthest from the sun!!! In short, it is impossible to account for the recurrence of the seasons on the assumption that the earth is globular and that it revolves in an orbit around the sun.”  -Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (124-125)

The seasons are caused by the Sun’s circuit round the Earth in a spiral ecliptic. In the Winter Solstice (December 21st), the Sun is vertical over the Tropic of Capricorn. Looking South from London, he appears to make a small circuit in the Southern sky, during the same period he is seen to cross the sky at almost overhead in Cape Town, thus causing Summer in the Southern Hemisphere. In the Summer Solstice (June 21st), the Sun is vertical over the Tropic of Cancer, (nearly overhead in London), while looking North from Cape Town, he appears to make a small circuit in the Northern sky, causing Winter in the Southern and Summer in the Northern Hemisphere.”  -E. Eschini, “Foundations of Many Generations” (7)

The essential feature of the year is its division into two equal periods of six months, based first on the predominating length of the days over that of the nights, and vice versa, conditions which are governed by the varying hours of sunrise and sunset; and secondly, by the either high or low height reached by the sun in the heavens at mid-day. The first cycle, during which the days are longer than the nights and the sun reaches its culminating point of the year, extends from the spring equinox to the autumn equinox, i.e. March 21st to September 22nd; and the second cycle during which, inversely, the duration of the nights exceeds that of the days, and the sun descends to its lowest point of the year, extends from the autumn equinox to the spring equinox, i.e. September 23rd to March 20th. These two six-month periods are also characterized by an opposition of temperature. During the first cycle which corresponds to spring and summer, the heat gradually rises and falls, while during the second cycle which comprises autumn and winter, it is the intensity of the cold which progressively increases and decreases.”  -Gabrielle Henriet, “Heaven and Earth” (3-4)

In the Flat-Earth model, the Sun and Moon spotlights are perpetually hovering over and parallel to the surface of the Earth.  From our vantage point, due to the Law of Perspective, the day/night luminaries appear to rise up the Eastern horizon, curve peaking high overhead, and then sink below the Western horizon.  They do not escape to the underside of the Flat-Earth as one might imagine, but rather rotate concentric clockwise circles around the circumference from tropic to tropic.  The appearance of rising, peaking and setting is due to the common Law of Perspective where tall objects appear high overhead when nearby, but at a distance gradually lower towards the vanishing point.

Although the Sun is at all times above and parallel to the Earth’s surface, he appears to ascend the firmament from morning until noon, and to descend and sink below the horizon at evening.  This arises from a simple and everywhere visible law of perspective.  A flock of birds, when passing over a flat or marshy country, always appears to descend as it recedes; and if the flock is extensive, the first bird appears lower, or nearer to the horizon than the last.  The farthest light in a row of lamps appears the lowest, although each one has the same altitude.  Bearing these phenomena in mind, it will easily be seen how the Sun, although always parallel to the surface of the Earth, must appear to ascend when approaching, and descend after leaving the meridian or noon-day position.”  -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Earth Not a Globe, 2nd Edition” (85)

What can be more common than the observation that, standing at one end of a long row of lamp-posts, those nearest to us seem to be the highest; and those farthest away the lowest; whilst, as we move along towards the opposite end of the series, those which we approach seem to get higher, and those we are leaving behind appear to gradually become lower … It is an ordinary effect of perspective for an object to appear lower and lower as the observer goes farther and farther away from it. Let any one try the experiment of looking at a light-house, church spire, monument, gas lamp, or other elevated object, from a distance of only a few yards, and notice the angle at which it is observed. On going farther away, the angle under which it is seen will diminish, and the object will appear lower and lower as the distance of the observer increases, until, at a certain point, the line of sight to the object, and the apparently uprising surface of the earth upon or over which it stands, will converge to the angle which constitutes the ‘vanishing point’ or the horizon; beyond which it will be invisible.”  -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (230-1)

Heliocentrists would have you believe the very opposite of what every human who has ever walked the Earth has seen with their own eyes.  It is obvious to any child and sovereign-minded adult that the Sun, Moon, stars and planets, every light in the sky above, revolves around the motionless Earth beneath our feet.  It is also plain to see that the Sun and Moon are both approximately the same size and situated relatively close to Earth, not 400 times divergent and millions upon millions of miles away.  To abandon your senses and every day experience in favor of such unfounded science-fiction fantasies is a fallacy of appeal to authority so extreme that it leaves the brain-washed believer impotent to trust his own natural instincts and forever thereafter chained to the fantastical explanations of astronomical charlatans.

No one ever yet felt or saw the earth careering through space at the terrific rates it is credited with, but everyone who is not blind can see the sun move.  But the matter can be tested.  It may be known for certain whether the sun moves or not.  Take a school globe and place a stile on the semicircle that holds it in position.  Cause the globe to rotate against a lamp on a table, and you will find that the shadow left on the globe is always parallel to the equator, at whatever angle you may incline the globe.  Further, let the stile be of sufficient length to allow the shadow to fall on to a flat surface, moving the globe towards the lamp, and the shadow will be a straight line.  If, therefore, the shadow left on the earth by the sun be a straight line, then undoubtedly the sun is stationary.  Drive a stake into the ground in such a position as to expose it to the sun for the greater part of a day - the whole day if possible.  Mark the end of the shadow every quarter of an hour, and you will find that the marks form part of an elongated curve, clearly proving that the sun moves over a stationary earth.  -Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (113)

The Path of the Sun is Concentric, expanding and contracting daily for six months alternately. This is easily proved by fixing a rod, say at noon on the 21st of December, so that, on looking along it, the line of vision will touch the lower edge of the Sun. This line of sight will continue for several days pretty much the same, but, on the ninth or tenth day, it will be found that the rod will have to be moved considerably toward the zenith, in order to touch the lower edge of the Sun, and every day afterwards it will have to be raised till the 22nd of June. Then there will be little change for a few days as before, but day by day afterwards the rod will have to be lowered till the 21st of December, when the Sun is farthest from the Northern Centre, and it is dark there. This expansion and contraction of the Sun's path continues every year, and is termed the Northern and Southern Declination, and should demonstrate to Modem Astronomers the absurdity of calling the World a Planet, as it remains stationary while the Sun continues circling round the heavens.”  -David Wardlaw Scott, “Terra Firma” (184-5)


Support independent publishing: Buy this book on Lulu.



Buy The Flat Earth Conspiracy 252-Page Paperback, eBook, or ePub

18 comments:

albumfixer said...

Thank you, and I saw that Scientific American and others have even admitted that "The moon's surface sometimes glows with its own luminescence." "Luminescence" is a kind of cool light phenomena caused by chemical, biological, or other reasons that do not involve heat. So the sun is a hot light, and the moon is a cold light, according to science and our own observation. If we look at "planets" and "stars" through a powerful zoom lens and we can clearly see they are not solid objects, but are in fact transparent with an ever changing shape. Freaky.

Anonymous said...

So the sun would have to move much more quickly along the tropic of capricorn, correct? Otherwise this model wouldn't work, because a day wouldn't be 24 hours there. It would be longer.

Then in reality, the sun is always gradually changing speed, wouldn't that be so?

---David

Eric Dubay said...

Yes, from the Winter Solstice at the Tropic of Capricorn the Sun's spiral path narrows and its speed decreases daily until hitting the Tropic of Cancer at the Summer Solstice, at which point its spiral path widens and speed increases so as to always make one revolution in 24 hours.

Anonymous said...

Looking at mainstream sources and being sensitized to the issue it strikes me how the entire paradigm of a flat earth is being treated like a minor issue, with regards to previous ages. It is regarded as if it never really was such a big deal, despite the fact that it is in line with biblical terms & the church being the greatest worldly power for at least 1500 years - Mainstream History even puts Ptolomy in a place where he supposedly thought of everything as Geocentric while the earth being a ball (Ever reconsidered the true reason of the burning of the great library of alexandria? The event has been termed as the greatest loss of the "collective memory") - It is really bizzar and somewhat obvious once "in the know" - how it is intentionally belittled in historical terms and yet it cannot be hyped enough when it comes to pushing it as THE stereotype of "backwardness" & "silliness" just for daring to give this a second thought.

I was wondering what you think of this newspaper article by a man named George Orwell:
http://www.telelib.com/authors/O/OrwellGeorge/essay/tribune/AsIPlease19461227.html

About a year leater he was finished with his novel 1948 (with clear pointers to the flat earth paradigm) and not much later then that he was dead. Not sure what to make of this...Your insights would be highly welcome. Also some pointers to the overall perspective as to what all this means (the big WHY) in spiritual terms would be highly appreciated. Thank you very much!

Anonymous said...

Regarding the previous comment with the orwell article:

Basically the first 3 paragraphs are the most interesting giveaways. I cannot help but understand this entire article as (in a way) practically demonstrating exactly the methods applied in terms of distracting from the underlying "real" issue, (which we can recognize everywhere, when trying to understand the subject,solely relying on mainstream sources)- One step forward - three steps back....

(Unfortunately I have not been able to get a hold of the pice by Shaw he mentions, I reckon as a literature critic himself, Orwell could have been more precise: So I guess there we might have a pointer to something else that should be interesting)

Jim said...

Brilliant piece Eric, and beautifully written.

BinGhazali Ismail said...

Hi Eric, I'm interested in your work and like to delve more into flat earth. Today one of my countryman have said to find prove of Gravity! With their Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Can you study and explain what are they actually talking about for layman like me.

Val said...

what I dont understand is, what causes the sun and moon to move?, are they being pulled by the earths magnetic core?,
if the earth does have one, as we have been taught so many lies, its just hard to wipe the slate clean and relearn all that we have ever been told, including all his-story.

John said...

@Val Not only that but the sun seems to accelerate and deccelerate, I'm also not sure how that works. Acceleration needs some kind of power, else it would be magic and that's not something we do have here on earth. The sun can't really be "pulled" as that would imply some kind of mechanism like gravity which doesn't exist according to some older post.

Anonymous said...

BinGhazali Ismail said...

prove of Gravity! With their Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. ... explain ... for layman like me.

They have succeeded in making you believe that you are just a layman.

Val said...

That's true John, and also as they are only light of different degrees, what could possibly make them move, and what would make it accelerate and then slow, there has to be a logical reason, Eric? or anyone got any ideas on this subject?

Val said...

Hi Eric,

do you have an idea to what causes the sun and moon to rotate, the fact that it is supposed to accelerate and decrease, means there must be something in place to have caused it to begin and continue. Would really appreciate your input on this please.

David said...

Eric,
Good stuff.
Question:
How do we account for meteorites and also the black line all over Earth that supposedly comes from a gigantic meteor hitting the planet? And...tektite rocks which nobody knows how are formed but supposedly come from meteorites colliding with Earth and combining with earth/rock and creating the tektite rock.
Regards,
>David<

Klas said...

If the sun and moon are flat discs, they would appear round when straight above us, and oval when moving out of sight. How can that be?

Also they would look smaller when moving out of sight. Right?

Much love

Klas

Anonymous said...

Another great article. Keep these coming.

Eric, I really like your interviews, but haven't seen any new ones lately. Do you plan to do anymore soon?

Anonymous said...

"They want you to believe that the Moon's rotation is perfectly synchronized with its orbit so that's why we only ever see one side of the Moon, rather than conclude the obvious - that the Moon is simply NOT rotating. "


Who wants us to believe this, and why? This is great stuff, but this aspect is sort of confusing me.

noeline clayfield said...

Thank you for all you do. I have always been a flat earther but had not stopped to think of the implications of the globe model forced on us through education mind control! I bought my grandson a globe for xmas and then started to think about it!?! All the fuss about flat earth has eluded me but on mentioning it to people recently have noticed that the first reaction is shock and rude denial. I cannot talk to my children about it without a huge argument. I just wondered if you had any ideas Eric on where all those wonderful hackers who have released such amazing information exposing our criminal governments and their activities could hack to get info on the outer ice ring "Antartica" or indeed mapping organisations that would have info on what we look like. Perhaps the Vatican, Military Industrial Complex or such? Surely there is some infra ray technology that could record depth of earth or could be used to measure the earth say at 100 miles above earth? I wish my scientific education was more comprehensive and extensive as there is so much I want to understand. I have watched all your work and viewed many times. I really enjoy the scientific proof! How incredible that we actually do not know the construct of our Earth or have real photographic proof!

noeline clayfield said...

Could you comment please Eric on Santos Bonacci's Annalema (the figure eight structure that spans from Tropics) and of course would have the sun and moon speed up to fit the longer orbit of Capricorn? He also theorises that the sun is higher on Tropic of Cancer and comes lower on Tropic of Capricorn. Having spent most of my life in Australia with very fair skin which has suffered terribly from the summers in Australia and now living in the UK which I find much milder summers...this does make some sense to me. Also I have experienced a great different in the lengths of day in the summer between these two locations. Twilight in Australia is very different to what is experienced in the UK. I thought another good proof of immovable flat earth was the reaction when we feel an earthquake. It is terribly disorienting! We also dislike winds in excess of 10mph so the 1000mph is completely ludicrous. Often there is no breeze at all! I just laugh now when there is another satellite or more NASA stupidity...Lol. I have an understanding of the Holographic universe and wonder if we just create our world through our eyes and therefore each person has a different perception. Everything else in our world is level such as a dinnerplate on our table and the floors of our houses. We are in fact quite disoriented when surfaces are unlevel like putting a glass of water on an unlevel surface!