“Once again the elite claimed that only global governance could save humanity from certain destruction and this time the elite would succeed in setting up their world body. In April 1945 … the United Nations was founded by the victors of World War II. The United Nations complex was then built in
“World War II facilitated the American acceptance of a global ‘peacekeeping" institution - the United Nations. After the U.S. had rejected the first attempt to create such an institution in the League of Nations, the Illuminati decided to create an arm of the Rothschild funded Round Table groups which could help influence western society towards the embracement of globalism.” -Fritz Springmeier, “Bloodlines of the Illuminati”
In 1948 George Orwell wrote 1984, another quasi-fiction novel about the big brother control-grid surveillance societies to come. Orwell said, “If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever.” On February 7th, 1950 FDR’s financial advisor, international banker James Paul Warburg stated before the United States Senate Foreign Relations Committee that "We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” Two days later the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee introduced Senate Concurrent Resolution 66 stating that the United Nations Charter “should be changed to provide a true world government constitution.” In 1952, globalist and Committee of 300 member Bertrand Russell wrote “The Impact of Science on Society.” Russell, like Wells, wrote extensively about world government and the scientific dictatorships of the future:
“There is, it must be confessed, a psychological difficulty about a single world government. The chief source of social cohesion in the past, I repeat, has been war: the passions that inspire a feeling of unity are hate and fear. These depend upon the existence of an enemy, actual or potential. It seems to me that a world government could only be kept in being by force, not by the spontaneous loyalty that now inspires a nation at war.” -Bertrand Russell, “The Impact of Science on Society” (36)
“It is possible nowadays for a government to be very much more oppressive than any government could be before there was scientific technique. Propaganda makes persuasion easier for the government; public ownership of halls and paper makes counter-propaganda more difficult; and the effectiveness of modern armaments makes popular risings impossible. No revolution can succeed in a modern country unless it has the support of at least a considerable section of the armed forces. But the armed forces can be kept loyal by being given a higher standard of life than that of the average worker, and this is made easier by every step in the degradation of ordinary labour. Thus the very evils of the system help to give it stability. Apart from external pressure, there is no reason why such a regime should not last for a very long time." -Bertrand Russell, “The Impact of Science on Society” (61)
"A scientific world society cannot be stable unless there is a world government ... unless there is a world government which secures universal birth control, there must from time to time be great wars, in which the penalty of defeat is widespread death by starvation ... Unless, at some stage, one power or group of powers emerges victorious and proceeds to establish a single government of the world with a monopoly of armed forces, it is clear that the level of civilization must decline until scientific warfare becomes impossible - that is until science is extinct." -Bertrand Russell, “The Impact of Science on Society” (117)
Shortly after Russell’s book, fellow Committee of 300 member Aldous Huxley wrote “Brave New World” about a future pharmacological scientific dictatorship in which the drugged citizens are described as “smiling depressives that love their servitude.” Aldous Huxley’s grandfather T.H. Huxley was another Committee of 300 member known as “
“The older dictators fell because they could never supply their subjects with enough bread, enough circuses, enough miracles, and mysteries. Under a scientific dictatorship, education will really work…most men and women will grow up to love their servitude and will never dream of revolution. There seems to be no good reason why a thoroughly scientific dictatorship should ever be overthrown.” -Aldous Huxley, “Brave
In his 1962 publication, “The Future of Federalism” bloodline governor of New York and CFR member, Nelson Rockefeller, promoted the New World order: “The nation-state is becoming less and less competent to perform its international political tasks … These are some of the reasons pressing us to lead vigorously toward the true building of a new world order … Sooner perhaps than we may realize … there will evolve the bases for a federal structure of the free world.” Years later on July 26, 1968 campaigning for the presidency, Nelson Rockefeller told the Associated Press that “as president, he would work toward the creation of a new world order.”
Bloodline president and CFR member Richard Nixon was quoted in the October 1967 Foreign Affairs stating: "The developing coherence of Asian regional thinking is reflected in a disposition to consider problems and loyalties in regional terms, and to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a new world order.”
In 1969 the first black Congressman from
Zbigneiw Brzezinski is a former
“Brzezinski is the author of a book that should have been read by every American interested in the future of this country. Entitled ‘The Technotronic Era,’ it was commissioned by the Club of
In the April 1974 issue of the (CFR) Council on Foreign Relations’ journal, “Foreign Affairs,” member Richard N. Gardner wrote: “The
In October 1975 during an address before the United Nations General Assembly, Henry Kissinger said, "My country's history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order.”
Later in October, the 24th, 1975, the World Affairs Council of
Also in 1975 Richard A. Falk wrote a book called “On the Creation of a Just World Order.” In one section of the book called “Toward the New World Order: Modest Methods and Drastic Visions,” Falk wrote, "The existing order is breaking down at a very rapid rate, and the main uncertainty is whether mankind can exert a positive role in shaping a new world order or is doomed to await collapse in a passive posture. We believe a new order will be born no later than early in the next century and that the death throes of the old and the birth pangs of the new will be a testing time for the human species."
Another whistle-blowing Congressman was Larry P. McDonald, who was then killed onboard a plane suspiciously shot down by soviets. In 1976 he said, “The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent."
"There exists a shadowy Government with its own Air Force, its own Navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to pursue its own ideas of national interest, free from all checks and balances, and free from the law itself.” -Senator, Daniel K. Inouye, 1977
"Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order." -Mikhail Gorbachev, United Nations address, December, 1988
"We can see beyond the present shadows of war in the
“The crisis in the
"If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging
"But it became clear as time went on that in Mr. Bush's mind the New World Order was founded on a convergence of goals and interests between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, so strong and permanent that they would work as a team through the U.N. Security Council."-A. M. Rosenthal, New York Times, January, 1991
"I would support a Presidential candidate who pledged to take the following steps: ... At the end of the war in the Persian Gulf, press for a comprehensive
“What is at stake is more than one small country. It is a big idea, a New World Order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve universal aspirations of mankind— peace and security, freedom and the rule of law. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective, a new world order, can emerge. Now we can see a new world coming into being, a world in which there is the very real prospect of a new world order.” -President George Bush, State of the Union Address, September 11, 1991
"George Bush has been surrounding himself with people who believe in one-world government. They believe that the Soviet system and the American system are converging. The vehicle to bring this about is the United Nations, the majority of whose 166 member states are socialist, atheist, and anti-American." -
“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all.” -Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, Time Magazine, July 20th, 1992
"It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance." -George Bush, 1992
"The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth - in Morocco - to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund." -part of full-page advertisement by the government of
"[The New World Order] cannot happen without
“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the
"We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money." -Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in the CFR’s Foreign Affairs July/August 1995
"To achieve One World Government it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, their loyalty to family traditions and national identification." -Brock Chisholm, while director of UN (WHO) World Health Organization
In 1998, Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote another book called “The Grand Chessboard,” in which he compared the elite control of the world to a game of chess and accurately “predicted” Afghani terror attacks and the rise of the
Just three days after the 9/11 attacks on the Pentagon and
In his 2002 Memoirs, David Rockefeller openly admitted conspiring with other globalists toward a one-world order: "Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the
Pope John Paul II stated at the World Day of Peace Homily on Jan. 1st, 2004 that, "People are becoming more and more aware of the need for a new international order.”
With the success of Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth” movie (which should be called “Convenient Half-Truths”) and a U.N. panel’s worth of poor science from the IPCC, the globalists are hoping to convince us that a world carbon-tax will save us from global warming. In 2007 British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said, “A

Buy The Atlantean Conspiracy Now


7 comments:
The dates for this wondrous Beast to be born keep slipping. Reality is turning out to be less compliant with these "best laid plans" than anticipated.
One of the reasons for this is the staggering incompetence of the institutions and players in these cabals. The transparent farces that virtually all UN "Commissions" etc. have become, and the revelations of shoddy and fiddled 'science' being touted as justifications for greater power centralization, are gnawing at the supports for the Grand Edifice.
And here's a little wild card for you. What if there existed a power source, readily and inexpensively deployable everywhere in the world, which was pollution and waste-free, and which enriched and empowered every jurisdiction, large or small that utilized it?
If my hopes and expectations come to fruition, a small project in NJ will unveil a product called the FocusFusion.org generator within less than 5 years which will be able to provide power at 1/20 of current best costs. This will undercut and deflate EVERY economic and environmental justification the NWOers are deploying to aggrandize themselves and their imagined Global Governance bodies. Who will need or want them?
I totally agree with your analysis in the first paragraph. As for free/sustainable energy technology of the kind you mentioned, it would be both a great benefit to humanity and a great blow to the oil oligarchs. God speed with your project; it sounds like a venture well worth your time, and much needed and appreciated. Peace
Not free, just very, very economical. The bypassing of very lossy stages of energy conversion (steam turbines, in particular) is a great part of it. Another is the negligible fuel costs -- about $2 per megawatt-year. Divide that by 1000 x 365 x 24 to get kwh fuel costs, if you can be bothered! :) Labor costs are much higher, about 0.1¢/kwh. ;( ;)
I don't have a problem with a new world order. Isn't that what Jesus is supposed to establish on his return? No. there's no problem with world peace and goodwill towards all men. The "problem" stems from the fact that mankind still has not been able to establish a perfect form of government that will treat all people equally. In spite of limits on gov't set by our own Constitution, they still manage to find lawyer-speak, backed by a stacked Supreme Court, that over-rides the wording AND intent of the Founders. Judicial Review of the Constitution is a power usurped by the Supreme Court. All powers of the fed gov't are listed in the Constitution, but the power of judicial review of the Constitution is not in there, not given to any of the three branches. Hence, the power of judicial review belongs to The People. The new world order will not protect the God given rights of man. It will continue to find ways to usurp the power of the people. -A. Sprout
The "problem" stems from the fact that mankind still has not been able to establish a perfect form of government that will treat all people equally.
All governments do treat us equally inferior. They all force us to pay taxes and violently come take them if we don't pay willingly. There will never be a "perfect form of government" because "Govern" means "Control," and in a perfect society people are FREE and autonomous, not controlled by some utopian bureaucracy.
The New world order was a creation of people of Abraham who took over every culture and their Governments in their path to control all systems to eventually destroy every one.
Which reflects the statement in the post - "building the NWO from the ground up" for more stable roots so they cannot be up rooted.
--------------------------
Even if you make free energy before eliminating them from all the world governments and religious system -- it will only add to their power ( it will become their tool) and you will loose every thing.
It will only power their weapons and not your homes.
Soon to come - Random Ordered Nation - Not a Government, but a system of legitimate command. You can't stop a nation that doesn't exist, except in the minds of its inhabitants. We are them, you are us. Watch for it.
Post a Comment