Thursday, June 16, 2016

Polaris Proves the Flat Earth

NASA and modern astronomy say the Earth is a giant globe spinning 1,000 mph around its central axis, traveling 67,000 mph circles around the Sun, spiraling 500,000 mph around the Milky Way, while the entire galaxy rockets a ridiculous 670,000,000 mph through the Universe, with all of these motions originating from an alleged “Big Bang” cosmogenic explosion 14 billion years ago.  That’s a grand total of 670,568,000 mph in several different directions we’re all supposedly speeding along at simultaneously.  No one has ever seen, felt, heard, measured or proven such motion, yet the vast majority of people unquestioningly accept that the clearly motionless Earth beneath their feet is actually moving over six hundred million miles per hour!

NASA and modern astronomy say Polaris, the North Pole star, is somewhere between 323-434 light years, or about 2 quadrillion miles, away from us!  Firstly, note that is between 1,938,000,000,000,000 - 2,604,000,000,000,000 miles making a difference of 666,000,000,000,000 (over six hundred trillion) miles!  If modern astronomy cannot even agree on the distance to stars within hundreds of trillions of miles, perhaps their “science” is flawed and their theory needs re-examining.  However, even granting them their obscurely distant stars, heliocentric astronomers cannot adequately explain how Polaris manages to always remain almost perfectly aligned straight above the North Pole.

If the globe-Earth was really spinning West-East 1,000 mph, orbiting the Sun counter-clockwise at 67,000 mph, spiraling around the outer-arms of the Milky Way at 500,000 mph, while shooting through the Universe at 670,000,000 mph, how is it even conceptually possible that Polaris, 2 quadrillion miles away, day after day, year after year, always maintains its alignment straight above the North Pole!?  That would mean from 2 quadrillion miles away, Polaris would have to be perfectly mirroring Earth’s several simultaneous wobbling, spinning, spiraling, and shooting motions.  Polaris would have to be shooting the same direction through the Universe at exactly 670,000,000 mph; it would have to be following the same 500,000 mph, 225 million year spiral around the Milky Way, and mirroring the same 67,000 mph, 365 day orbit around our Sun!  Or, the Earth is stationary - as common sense and everyday experience testifies.  

It is supposed in the regular course of the Newtonian theory that the Earth is, in June, about 190 millions of miles (190,000,000) away from its position in December. Now, since we can, (in middle north latitudes) see the North Star, on looking out of a window that faces it - and out of the very same corner of the very same pane of glass in the very same window - all the year round, it is proof enough for any man in his senses that we have made no motion at all.  -William Carpenter, “100 Proofs the Earth is Not a Globe” (80)

Not only this, but viewed from a ball-Earth, Polaris, situated almost straight over the North Pole, should not be visible anywhere in the Southern Hemisphere.  For Polaris to be seen from the Southern Hemisphere of a globular Earth, the observer would have to be somehow looking “through the globe,” and miles of land and sea would have to be transparent.  Polaris can be seen, however, up to approximately 23.5 degrees South latitude.

If the Earth is a sphere and the pole star hangs over the northern axis, it would be impossible to see it for a single degree beyond the equator, or 90 degrees from the pole.  The line-of-sight would become a tangent to the sphere, and consequently several thousand miles out of and divergent from the direction of the pole star.  Many cases, however, are on record of the north polar star being visible far beyond the equator, as far even as the tropic of Capricorn.”  -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Earth Not a Globe, 2nd Edition” (41)

The astronomers' theory of a globular Earth necessitates the conclusion that, if we travel south of the equator, to see the North Star is an impossibility. Yet it is well known this star has been seen by navigators when they have been more than 20 degrees south of the equator. This fact, like hundreds of other facts, puts the theory to shame, and gives us a proof that the Earth is not a globe.”  -William Carpenter, “100 Proofs the Earth is Not a Globe” (71)

To account for this glaring problem in their model, desperate heliocentrists since the late 19th century have claimed the ball-Earth actually tilts a convenient 23.5 degrees back on its vertical axis.  Even this brilliant revision to their theory cannot account for the visibility of many other constellations though.  For instance, Ursa Major, very close to Polaris, can be seen from 90 degrees North latitude (the North Pole) all the way down to 30 degrees South latitude.  The constellation Vulpecula can be seen from 90 degrees North latitude, all the way to 55 degrees South latitude.  Taurus, Pisces and Leo can be seen from 90 degrees North all the way to 65 degrees South.  Aquarius and Libra can be seen from 65 degrees North to 90 degrees South!  The constellation Virgo is visible from 80 degrees North down to 80 degrees South, and Orion can be seen from 85 degrees North all the way to 75 degrees South latitude!  An observer on a ball-Earth, regardless of any tilt or inclination, should not logically be able to see this far.

Another thing is certain, that from within the equator the north pole star, and the constellations Ursa Major, Ursa Minor, and many others, can be seen from every meridian simultaneously; whereas in the south, from the equator, neither the so-called south pole star, nor the remarkable constellation of the Southern Cross, can be seen simultaneously from every meridian, showing that all the constellations of the south - pole star included - sweep over a great southern arc and across the meridian, from their rise in the evening to their setting in the morning.  But if the earth is a globe, Sigma Octantis, a south pole star, and the Southern Cross, a southern circumpolar constellation, they would all be visible at the same time from every longitude on the same latitude, as is the case with the northern pole star and the northern circumpolar constellations.  Such, however, is not the case.  -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (286)

Some heliocentrists have even tried to suggest that the Pole Star’s gradual declination overhead as an observer travels southwards is proof of a globular Earth.  Far from it, the declination of the Pole Star or any other object is simply a result of the Law of Perspective.  The Law of Perspective dictates that the angle and height at which an object is seen diminishes the farther one recedes from the object, until at a certain point the line of sight and the seemingly uprising surface of the Earth converges to a vanishing point (i.e. the horizon line) beyond which the object is invisible.

If we select a flat street a mile long, containing a row of lamps, it will be noticed that from where we stand the lamps gradually decline to the ground, the last one being apparently quite on the ground.  Take the lamp at the end of the street and walk away from it a hundred yards, and it will appear to be much nearer the ground than when we were close to it; keep on walking away from it and it will appear to be gradually depressed until it is last seen on the ground and then disappears.  Now, according to the astronomers, the whole mile was only depressed about eight inches from one end to the other, so that this 8 in. could not account for the enormous depression of the light as we recede from it.  This proves that the depression of the Pole Star can and does take place in relation to a flat surface, simply because we increase our distance from it, the same as from the street lamp.  In other words, the further away we get from any object above us, as a star for example, the more it is depressed, and if we go far enough it will sink (or appear to sink) to the horizon and then disappear.  The writer has tried the street lamp many times with the same result.”  -Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (34)

It has often been urged that the earth must be a globe, because the stars in the southern ‘hemisphere’ move round a south polar star; in the same way that those of the north revolve round the northern pole star. This is another instance of the sacrifice of truth, and denial of the evidence of our senses for the purpose of supporting a theory which is in every sense false and unnatural. It is known to every observer that the north pole star is the centre of a number of constellations which move over the earth in a circular direction. Those nearest to it, as the ‘Great Bear,’ etc. are always visible in England during their whole twenty-four hours' revolution. Those further away southwards rise north-north-east, and set south-south-west; still further south they rise east by north, and set west by north. The farthest south visible from England, the rising is more to the east and south-east, and the setting to the west and south-west. But all the stars visible from London rise and set in a way which is not compatible with the doctrine of rotundity. For instance, if we stand with our backs to the north, on the high land known as ‘Arthur's Seat,’ near Edinburgh, and note the stars in the zenith of our position, and watch for several hours, the zenith stars will gradually recede to the north-west. If we do the same on Woodhouse Moor, near Leeds, or on any of the mountain tops in Yorkshire or Derbyshire, the same phenomenon is observed. The same thing may be seen from the top of Primrose Hill, near Regent's Park, London; from Hampstead Heath; or Shooter's Hill, near Woolwich. If we remain all night, we shall observe the same stars rising towards our position from the north-east, showing that the path of all the stars between ourselves and the northern centre move round the north pole-star as a common centre of rotation; just as they must do over a plane such as the earth is proved to be. It is undeniable that upon a globe zenith stars would rise, pass over head, and set in the plane of the observer's position. If now we carefully watch in the same way the zenith stars from the Rock of Gibraltar, the very same phenomenon is observed. The same is also the case from Cape of Good Hope, Sydney and Melbourne in Australia, in New Zealand, in Rio Janeiro, Monte Video, Valparaiso, and other places in the south. If then the zenith stars of all the places on the earth, where special observations have been made, rise from the morning horizon to the zenith of an observer, and descend to the evening horizon, not in a plane of the position of such observer, but in an arc of a circle concentric with the northern centre, the earth is thereby proved to be a plane, and rotundity altogether disproved - shown, indeed, to be impossible.”  -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (284-6)

Support independent publishing: Buy this book on Lulu.

Buy The Flat Earth Conspiracy 252-Page Paperback, eBook, or ePub


Anonymous said...

This is probably my favorite proof of the Flat Earth. How can anyone possibly defend the Heliocentric model when Polaris never moves? It is mind-boggling what people will accept without giving one ounce of effort of looking into it for themselves… or rather, people believe that being told what to think IS doing research.

Big Steve said...

I was having a discussion with a close friend last night and brought up this point. Up until then he had a healthy skepticism of the evidence. When I showed him this he paused. "I thought you couldn't see Polaris past the equator.." he said, stroking his beard. I showed him that ancient navigators used Polaris even into many degrees South of the equator.
"Hmm, I may have been wrong this whole time..."

It was awesome to see a man I consider closer than a brother slowly awakening to the truth...

Anonymous said...

I didnt beleve none of this flat earth stuff at first untill iwatched one of your videos I only have one question tho if a train cant go uphill or on a curve then how do the trains in the Himalayan mountains go up and down

out of everything ive researched on the flat eart that is the only thing I still cant get my head around if you know I would appreciate it if you could reply to this thank you

Unknown said...

What are your thoughts on the procession of the equinoxes? The mainstream model has earth tilting away from Polaris as it goes through its cycle. Does the flat earth model take procession into account?

Unknown said...

Man i am truly greatful for the information you provide we truly are in an age of great awakening would love to go about looking for spiritual awakening as well i think just now my mind is becoming clear and trying to open minds to a different perspective is difficult but as in part to being lied to its very hard to accept when stating things that are very obvious yet go against everything we have been told does put up barriers keep fighting the good fight and i am a strong believer in what your opions will keep trying on My side of the map

Haze said...

The H.E. meets The F.E.

When I encountered the Hollow Earth theory in the late 1990's I was already a "conspiracy theorist" aware of the machinations of the wicked Cult of the Illuminati and their 'Long Range Plan.' I had studied Atlantology, Egyptology and Ufology in depth and the Hollow Earth was intriguing, it seemed to provide some answers to nagging questions, like where the 'gods' originated; from a Holy Mountain at the center of the Earth (Olympus, Meru, Zion etc.)

Therefore, I deduced that if there was any truth in our globe being hollow, with a world within, our ancient forebears with such advanced knowledge of science and technology (pyramids) would have known this. I dug out the myths and legends. First, I examined Egypt's beliefs and instantly realised it was all focused on one realm, the Underworld. Then I looked at the Maya, also with an Underworld, which was represented by the Ballcourt.

And so it went on, Celts, Maoris, Greeks, Indians... everyone knew about the Underworld. How curious, since supposedly none of these cultures ever met. The Underworld is considered by all academics to be an imaginary place, but that is not how it is described. It is accessible, through caves, lakes, waterfalls and mysterious locations, such as the World's End.

A solid sphere neither has a center or an end, only a hollow one could accommodate an Underworld, below ground. It was said to be reached in the far north; a Paradise where there is neither night or day and the 'gods' have immortality. That inevitably lead Hollow Earthers to the North Pole, where we assumed there was an opening, protected by the military and disguised by NASA. There are many anomalies recorded in this region.

The further north that explorers travelled past the ice, they noted warm seas, an abundance of insects, pollen and even foxes. It should not be so. There were also reports of witnessing a small hazy sun, which never rose or set. Hollow Earthers presumed these navigators had entered the polar depression and glimpsed the 'inner sun.'

However, if the Flat Earth is true, it could be our sun which is always visible, above the horizon at the extreme north. Many of the findings of Hollow Earth studies can be translated to the Flat Earth model. It has a center, which is due north, it also has an end... if you encounter the Antarctic ice barrier encompassing the seas and it must have an underside, the Underworld.

I can assure you Hollow Earthers are not controlled opposition, we are genuine and passionate in our beliefs, but our entire hypothesis is based on the Heliocentric globe model which, like everyone else, we had no reason to doubt, conditioned from birth. If it is a lie, it is monstrous and unforgivable and the people of Earth will denounce all authority, forever.

If we are living on a flat plane, surrounded by ocean with a canopy of stars, nothing more than lights reflecting water and a localised Sun and Moon, we can finally regain our sanity, our reality and most importantly, our spirituality and trust in God. The 'Son's of Baal' will resist this realisation with all their power, but that is rapidly diminishing and will evaporate when the truth comes out. Be prepared to have "aliens" and "asteroids" hurled at you!

It cannot stand, if there is no "outer-space" there is no threat, period! Hollywood's mission will be over and NASA's; the governments, media, scientists, church and scholars will have much explaining to do, but who would believe anything they ever said again? Astronomers, physicists, mathematicians and sages knew the nature of our world for thousands of years and that we are at the center of this Universe, just like the Bible said.

Haze said...

The Flat Earth appears to be the catalyst for the 'awakening' we have been anticipating. In 1895, William Carpenter wrote:

“And what then? What then? No intelligent man will ask the question; and he who may be called an intellectual man will know that the demonstration of the fact that the Earth is not a globe is the grandest snapping of the chains of slavery that ever took place in the world of literature or science. The floodgates of human knowledge are opened afresh and an impetus is given to investigation and dis­covery where all was stagnation, bewilderment and dreams!"

These wise words are even truer now, than they were then...

Anonymous said...

Has anyone found a proof of the stars being visible from impossible latitudes. I can't seem to. If you do please send a link. If you can't I consider this a loss for the fet. And glad I didn't tell everyone about it.

wanderer said...

the old mariners could judge the position of the pole star from the pointer stars. I have personally done this at 17 degrees south and it is easy. the pole star remains below the horizon, but its position can be judges by the rotation of the pointers easy