Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Establishing Standing and Jurisdiction in Court
Since your court summons uses your name in all capital letters, by admitting/consenting to the judge's presumption that you are the entity that they summonsed, you are accepting the most inferior standing possible, that of a non-living legal fiction i.e. the fictional corporate capitis diminutio maxima strawman version of you unknowingly created and entrusted to the state by your well-meaning mother when she registered you, her biological property, with the bureau of vital statistics at your birth.
So it is important to establish your standing as a living, breathing, flesh and blood man or woman (not a "person" which is a tricky legalese term that denotes inferior standing/status) by telling the judge for and on the record that you are a living, breathing flesh and blood man or woman here in the capacity of account administrator for the entity they summonsed, and not that fictional entity itself.
Another important matter is establishing jurisdiction which is another way the judge might try to assert authority over you. Below is an example of the method of establishing jurisdiction referenced in the first video above:
When you appear in court, the judge is using the jurisdiction of the Bar Society. We must assert that we are a living being, the blood flows; the flesh lives. So we say:
Sir, I’m here to establish, for and on the record, that I’m a living being, my blood flows; my flesh lives and I humbly ask for remedy.
At this point, it is remedy we seek. The judge now has to offer remedy or he is in dishonour; to avoid providing remedy and his own dishonour, he will leave the court. Whilst he has gone he does something in the background (In all likeliness a Masonic Ritual Prayer) When he comes back into court, he comes back in honour to regain jurisdiction under Maritime Admiralty Law. Our first statement must be to reiterate our standing:
Sir, to reiterate, for and on the record, I’m here to establish I’m a living being, my blood flows; my flesh lives, I humbly ask for cure and maintenance.
At this point it is cure and maintenance we seek. The judge now has to offer you cure and maintenance. (Admiralty), or he is in dishonour under this law; to avoid his dishonour again, he will leave the court for the second time. (Secretly changing identity to Ecclesiastic Minister) when he reappears, he is now an ecclesiastical priest, under Canon Law. (Vatican) Again, we must reiterate our standing:
Sir, to reiterate, for and on the record, I’m here to establish I’m a living being, my blood flows; my flesh lives, I am Sovereign and nothing stands between my self and the Divine.
It is only at this third standing that Sovereignty can be declared. As the judge has tried and failed at getting jurisdiction over you 3 times, he is in dishonour and his magic and can no longer work as a judge, The game is over for him. FOREVER. Ecclesiastical Dishonour is the only way to stop the judges and to assert our Sovereignty. We cannot assert this until the third standing. With this knowledge it is GAME OVER for all of them.
Read Original Article Here