Monday, October 14, 2013

The Earth is Not Moving

Before Copernican heliocentric indoctrination any child will look up at the sky and notice that the sun, moon, and stars all revolve around a stationary Earth. All empirical evidence from our perspective clearly shows that we are fixed and everything rotates around us. We feel motionless and experience the sun, moon, stars and planets spinning around us. To suspend this common sense geocentric perspective and assume that it's actually the Earth revolving beneath us daily while rotating around the sun yearly is quite a theoretical leap.

"What strikes you as being some thoughts that people would have if - in the short space of a few weeks - the universally held conviction that the Earth rotates on an axis daily and orbits the sun annually were exposed as an unscientific deception? Keep in mind that a rotating, orbiting earth is not counted as a mere hypothesis or even a theory anywhere in the world today. Oh no. Rather, this concept is an unquestioned 'truth'; an established 'fact' in all books and other media everywhere, church media included. Copernicanism, in short, is a concept that is protected in a bunker under a 50 foot thick ceiling of solid 'scientific' concrete. It is meant to be impregnable. It is a concept that has become ensconced in men’s minds as the indestructible cornerstone of enlightened modern man’s knowledge. Virtually all people everywhere have been taught to believe - and do believe - that this concept is based on objective science and dispassionate secular reasoning." -Marshall Hall, "Exposing the Copernican Deception"

"Every experiment ever designed to detect the motion of the earth has failed to detect earth's motion and/or distinguish it from relative counter motion of the universe." -Mark Wyatt, "Is Geocentricism Possible?"

Right up through the 20th century many attempts have been made to try and prove that heliocentricity is true and geocentricity is false. All such attempts have failed and only reinforced geocentricity. The most-well known of these is the Michelson-Morley experiment which attempted to measure the change in speed of light due to the assumed motion of Earth through space. They measured in every different direction in various places on the Earth's surface and failed to detect any significant change whatsoever. The Michelson-Gale experiment also failed to prove heliocentricity but was able to measure the movement of the aether/firmament around the Earth accurate to within 2%. An experiment known as "Airey's Failure" involves filling a telescope with water to slow down the speed of light inside. Usually telescopes must be slightly tilted to get the starlight down the axis of the tube supposedly due to "Earth's speed around the sun." Airey discovered that actually the starlight was already coming in at the correct angle so no change was necessary. This demonstrated that the stars move relative to a stationary Earth and not the other way around; if it was the telescope moving he would have to change the angle.

"People need to be aware that there is a range of models that could explain the observations. For instance, I can construct you a spherically symmetrical universe with Earth at its center, and you cannot disprove it based on observations. You can only exclude it on philosophical grounds. In my view there is absolutely nothing wrong in that. What I want to bring into the open is the fact that we are using philosophical criteria in choosing our models. A lot of cosmology tries to hide that.” -Cosmologist George Ellis, "Thinking Globally, Acting Universally"

In order to save the dying heliocentric theory from the conclusive geocentric experiments performed by Michelson, Morley, Gale, Sagnac, Kantor and others, establishment master-mind Albert Einstein created his Special Theory of Relativity which in one philosophical swoop banished the absolute aether/firmament from scientific study and replaced it with a form of relativism which allowed for heliocentricism and geocentricism to hold equal merit. If there is no universal aetheric medium within which all things exist, then philosophically one can postulate complete relativism with regard to the movement of two objects (such as the Earth and sun). Nowadays, just like the theory of heliocentricism, Einstein's theory of relativity is accepted worldwide as gospel truth, even though he himself admitted geocentricism is equally justifiable:

"The struggle, so violent in the early days of science, between the views of Ptolemy and Copernicus would then be quite meaningless. Either coordinate system could be used with equal justification. The two sentences, 'the sun is at rest and the earth moves,' or 'the sun moves and the earth is at rest,' would simply mean two different conventions concerning two different coordinate systems." -Albert Einstein

"We know that the difference between a heliocentric theory and a geocentric theory is one of relative motion only, and that such a difference has no physical significance." -Cosmologist Fred Hoyle

If one accepts the unintuitive, but very imaginative heliocentric model, then one accepts (even though it goes against observation, experimental evidence and common sense) that the Earth is actually spinning around its axis at 1,000 miles per hour, revolving around the sun at 67,000 miles per hour, while the entire solar system rotates around the Milky Way galaxy at 500,000 miles per hour, and the Milky Way speeds through the known Universe at over 670,000,000 miles per hour!

I'd like to know if we're really being subject to all those forces/motions, then why hasn't anyone in all of history ever felt it? How is it that all the centrifugal, gravitational, inertial and kinematic forces somehow cancel each other out perfectly so that no one has ever felt the slightest bit of motion or resistance? Why aren't there world-wide perturbations of our smooth rotation after earthquakes or meteor strikes? Why can I still feel the slightest breeze on my face, but not the air displacement from all this motion? If the Earth is spinning beneath us, why can't I just hover in a helicopter, wait until my destination reaches me, and then land when it comes?

Most people answer (though they can't explain how) that this is because the Earth's atmosphere supposedly rotates precisely along with the Earth. But if that's the case then heliocentric dogmatists run into a whole other host of problems. For instance, if both the Earth and its atmosphere are spinning 1,000 miles per hour West to East, then why don't pilots need to make 1,000 mph compensation acceleration when flying East to West? If thousand mile per hour atmosphere is constantly flowing Eastward, why don't North/South bound pilots have to set diagonal courses to compensate? If thousand mile per hour atmosphere is constantly flowing Eastward, how do you explain the casual yet unpredictable movement of clouds, wind patterns and weather formations every which way? If the atmosphere is constantly being pulled along with the Earth's rotation, then why can I feel the slightest Westward breeze but not the Earth's 1,000 mile per hour Eastward spin?

"In short, the sun, moon, and stars are actually doing precisely what everyone throughout all history has seen them do. We do not believe what our eyes tell us because we have been taught a counterfeit system which demands that we believe what has never been confirmed by observation or experiment. That counterfeit system demands that the Earth rotate on an 'axis' every 24 hours at a speed of over 1000 MPH at the equator. No one has ever, ever, ever seen or felt such movement (nor seen or felt the 67,000MPH speed of the Earth's alleged orbit around the sun ... or its 500,000 MPH alleged speed around a galaxy ... or its retreat from an alleged 'Big Bang' at over 670,000,000 MPH!). Remember, no experiment has ever shown the earth to be moving. Add to that the fact that the alleged rotational speed we've all been taught as scientific fact MUST decrease every inch or mile one goes north or south of the equator, and it becomes readily apparent that such things as accurate aerial bombing in WWII (down a chimney from 25,000 feet with a plane going any direction at high speed) would have been impossible if calculated on an earth moving below at several hundred MPH and changing constantly with the latitude." -Marshall Hall, "A Small, Young Universe After All"

Experiments have been performed firing canons in all cardinal directions to check for Earth's rotation. If the Earth was really spinning as the heliocentric model suggests then the East-firing cannonballs should fall significantly farther than all others and the West-firing cannonballs should fall significantly closer than all others. In actual fact, however, regardless of which direction one fires a cannon, North, South, East, or West, the distance covered is always the same.

"When sitting in a rapidly-moving railway carriage, let a spring-gun be fired forward, or in the direction in which the train is moving. Again, let the same gun be fired, but in the opposite direction; and it will be found that the ball or other projectile will always go farther in the first case than in the latter. If a person leaps backwards from a horse in full gallop, he cannot jump so great a distance as he can by jumping forward. Leaping from a moving sledge, coach, or other object, backwards or forwards, the same results are experienced. Many other practical cases could be cited to show that any body projected from another body in motion, does not exhibit the same behaviour as it does when projected from a body at rest. Nor are the results the same when projected in the same direction as that in which the body moves, as when projected in the opposite direction; because, in the former case, the projected body receives its momentum from the projectile force, plus that given to it by the moving body; and in the latter case, this momentum, minus that of the moving body. Hence it would be found that if the earth is moving rapidly from west to east, a cannon fired in a due easterly direction would send a ball to a greater distance than it would if fired in a due westerly direction. But the most experienced artillerymen - many of whom have had great practice, both at home and abroad, in almost every latitude - have declared that no difference whatever is observable. That in charging and pointing their guns, no difference in the working is ever required. Gunners in war ships have noticed a considerable difference in the results of their firing from guns at the bow, when sailing rapidly towards the object fired at, and when firing from guns placed at the stern while sailing away from the object: and in both cases the results are different to those observed when firing from a ship at perfect rest. These details of practical experience are utterly incompatible with the supposition of a revolving earth." -Samuel Rowbotham, "Zetetic Astronomy"

By removing Earth from the motionless center of the Universe, these dark philosophers (Copernicus, Kepler, Newton, Galileo, Einstein) have moved us physically and metaphysically from a place of supreme importance to one of complete nihilistic indifference. If the Earth is the center of the Universe, then the ideas of God, creation, and a purpose for human existence are resplendent. But if the Earth is just one of billions of planets revolving around billions of stars in billions of galaxies, then the ideas of God, creation, and a specific purpose for Earth and human existence become highly implausible.

"The heliocentric theory, by putting the sun at the center of the universe ... made man appear to be just one of a possible host of wanderers drifting through a cold sky. It seemed less likely that he was born to live gloriously and to attain paradise upon his death. Less likely, too, was it that he was the object of God’s ministrations." -Morris Kline

By removing Earth from the motionless center of the Universe, the entirety of astrology, a science of consciousness coveted and used obsessively by the elite, is made null and void. If the Earth is the center of the Universe and all the planets (ancient gods) revolve around us, then birth charts, alignments, and astrology are measurable, calculable, repeatable, and thus scientifically verifiable. But if the Earth is just one of billions of planets revolving around billions of stars in billions of galaxies, then astrology disappears into the realms of pseudo-science believed by our ignorant ancestors.


"Trust your eyes and your cameras! They have no reason to deceive you about whether the stars are going around nightly! Then get it in your mind: This single fact surrounding star trails that has been photographed thousands of times and cannot be denied must be explained away by the Theoretical Science Establishment. All of the factless allegations - a rotating and orbiting Earth; billions of light year distances to the stars; a 15 billion year old universe; the whole Big Bang Paradigm; all of the alleged evolution of the universe, earth, and mankind; ...that is to say: all of modern evolution-based cosmology controlling "knowledge" today...all of it... is completely undone if the stars are doing what cameras show they are doing, namely, going around the Earth nightly ... If you can do so for a few minutes, just lay aside the Copernican indoctrination that accompanies such pictures and take a good hard look at these photographs of something that really, really happens every single night. Do you see what I see? I see all the visible stars in the northern skies going around the North Star in perfect circles. In other words, I see all the stars which these time exposures have recorded actually going around that navigational star that God put there for us in the Northern Hemisphere. Remember: the first two pictures are eight hour exposures. Again, look closely and you can see the third of a circle in the center and in the next star trail or so. This means that each star circles in one 24 hour day. The same thing is captured in circumpolar photos taken in the Southern Hemisphere." -Marshall Hall, "The Size and Structure of the Universe"


We live in a yin-yang world of duality where everything and its opposite exist together in perfect proportions like male/female, good/evil, hot/cold, knowledge/ignorance, inhale/exhale, dark/light, day/night and of course, sun and moon. Half our lives (the daytime) are ruled by the sun and half our lives (the nighttime) are ruled by the moon. When you look up at the sun and the moon they are in perfect proportion to one another as exemplified during an eclipse. But thanks to a total eclipse of the mind these nihilistic cosmologists have indoctrinated world-wide generations of people to believe Earth itself and all the planets revolve around the sun. That the sun is much larger and farther away, the moon is much smaller and closer, and it's simply our coincidental perspective here on Earth that makes them appear the same size. They have convinced us that the very Earth on which we stand is spinning beneath our feet. So next time you're wondering why it's so difficult to awaken your friends and family to the Atlantean conspiratorial matrix, consider how deep the establishment indoctrination really is, and how easy it is to convince people that up is down and down is up.













219 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 219 of 219   Newer›   Newest»
Anonymous said...

Explain this one away then. How do you explain the pattern that the pendulum traces, if the earth is'nt rotating.

http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2010/09/17/but-it-moves-how-we-know-the-e/


Also.. what about all the space station footage of the earth rotating. Is that presumably fake?

Salama said...

@Anonymous
The pendulum rotates as the celestial bodies (and their aether) rotates daily around the Earth.
And during eclipses the pendulum rotates faster!! Which is called the unexplained Allais Effect. So the pendulum movement was a result of some movement "up there" not "down here".
-----
The ISS moves around the earth! Of course it'll look like the ground moves beneath it.. like watching earth from a plane window, or watching the road from a moving train!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WN0oOarM1AQ

Anonymous said...

Hello all, very interesting comments made by both sides of the debate.. my question is a simple one ..has nasa produced any video evidence of the earth spinning at 1000 mph in real time?.. and can any verify without referring to scientific evidence / papers how they measured that the earth is spinning at any given speed

Unknown said...

Hi Eric, nice site, although only read the Earth not moving posts...do you read the comments?

What would you suppose of the three 'invisible planets'? I would suspect another conspiracy by the Church...

You have reference to numerology, so you will easily follow.
Uranus, discovered 13 March 1781 - numerologically 6
Neptune, discovered 23 September (Equinox) 1846 - numerologically 6
Pluto, discovered 18 February 1930 - numerologically 6

At roughly the same time of their discuoveries, we have oil (O), electricity (E) and nuclear (N) - ONE

The 666 references are within the New Testament which we know is allegory, not literal, but those who make it literal are exposing something?

On 25 January 2017, Uranus will have revolved around the Zodiac over two times (times), Neptune will have revolved over 1 time (time) and Pluto will have revolved exactly on that date, half a time around the zodiac (half a time)...time, times and half a time is also a very significant statement in what the Church has told us is "end times" Bible allegories...

I ask you to meditate on that...I have, and I know what I see....

BTW - Wil be in Thailand in May next year, love to meet you....
So, where we heading with all this in THEIR minds...what they have planned?

Anonymous said...

The Foucault Pendulum does not prove the earth moves. Those who hang onto this rubbish as a last resort to prove their shattered globe programming need to use their minds and eyes and wake up from the delusion. The reason why the BS (Bad Science) pendulum does not prove the earth moves is: 1. it has to be manually started and 2. it stops 3. the only reason it rotates is because of either a magnetic anomaly or the circuit of the sun and moon and stars. The coriolis non-effect has never been proven except in the theoretical labs of harlot scientists who sold their souls for a bit of cash and fame that at the end of the day will prove their pride and stubbornness a stumbling block to them!!

Anonymous said...

The earth is absolutely at the center of the universe, and it is also not. The reason we can't jump up and wait for the earth to spin to arrive at a new location is the same reason you can't do that on a train moving at a constant speed. However if the earth or train were to accelerate while we're in the air then certainly we would see relative motion. It all relative. From our perspective (the only one that matters) we are at the center of the Universe. The theory of relativity holds and unless you can prove that there is a firmament or either this is all moot.

EJAZ said...

Here is the proof written by A'la Hadhrat Imam Ahmed Raza bareilly.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01BJR5MCI

Anonymous said...

So if the space shuttle leaves earth going into space and the earth is spinning 1000 miles per hour, then how does it find its way back in? Timing would have to be pretty precise 🤓

Anonymous said...

Hello: My name is Mark. I have recently, in the past few years been introduced to the idea of geocentricity and find it fascinating and more in line with that which I find written in the Holy Bible - which I am fully persuaded not to be the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which effectually worketh in those who believe (1 Thessalonians 2:13).

Today, for whatever reason, I wanted to see what I could find in the geocentric community as pertains to an explanation for the rotation of the stars as observed through time lapse photography. Basically, comes down to the earth rotating or the stars are rotating.

In my searching, I've come across a lot of strange stuff. But, I want to give serious consideration to anything that is truly plausible. Anyway, one of the arguments I have come across is that if the earth is rotating, the surface velocity is thus and thus and that it would change depending on where you were on the surface relative to equator and the poles. This makes physical sense and I think there is something to be said with this argument. However, the logic I've seen used in this argument falls short with me.

The most common argument I've seen thus far is something like this; a projectile shot from a spring gun on a rapid moving train will travel farther depending on whether or not it was shot to the front or to the back of the train because it is being shot from a moving train. Relative to the ground, the distance traveled by the projectile is indeed different. But, is the distance traveled different when measured relative to the train? Will the projectile not fall the same distance from where it was shot relative to the train regardless of shooting toward the front or the back? Unfortunately, this argument is used to say that when on the equator, the distance traveled should be different depending on shooting east or west. But, this is a flawed argument because in this argument, the train would represent the earth. That is, whether or not the earth is rotating, any projectile shot east or west while on the equator is still starting from a given position relative to the earth (moving or stationary) and will travel the same distance relative to the earth whether shot east or west because it is acted upon by the same force starting from the same position. That is, without a fixed external reference point in space, it's not possible to prove how far the projectile actually traveled in space.

In my opinion, this argument regarding the changing surface velocity would be better used with regard to shooting a projectile from the north or south pole toward the equator on a line of constant longitude would behave. If the earth is rotating, the surface velocity under the projectile would increase perpendicular to the line of the shot as stated and it would thus presumably be impossible to shoot a projectile along a straight line of longtitude because the surface velocity is changing while the project is presumably not being acted upon by any other force. Would it not make sense to go down this route as far as this argument is concerned? I'm pretty sure that it is possible to shoot a projectile from one of the poles on a straight line of longitude toward the equator. Perhaps if I search more, I'll find such an argument.

Anonymous said...

Hello Eric, Thanks for your blog, website and videos. They are most interesting and provide much food for thought.

I have been investigating many things but whether the earth is flat is not really one of them just yet but at some point definately will.

I do think that you do put a lot of emphasis on the premise that if earth is flat then this implies some intelligence has createdit and us but it could be reasoned that if the earth is a globe of sorts its creation could also be the result of some intelligence.
For instance, it occurs to me that the scientific observation that all matter moves towards a state of entropy is supposeldly universal whereas life itself moves in the opposite direction from a state disorder to a state of order at least for the lifespan of the organism. It would imply that life itself is not random by any means by very specific and dependant on energy/force, intelligence and conditions to take place.
The form in which intelligence is present also does not have to conform to the types that we are able to observe, theorise about or even comprehend since the abstraction of that which we do not know about far outweights that which we do know about and it could be that our position is to decrease that gap of knowledge.

It is clear that the information that we are programmed with has been divined to restrict our thoughts and movements and to stunt our capacity to discriminate and freely question. We are set about by multiple falsehoods daily that direct us and preach the false morality of the state.
Most are not aware that morality is borne out of the rationalisation of life itself and by extension each individual is his her own highest authority.

I'd like to thank you for sharing your information hope to also have something worthwhile to contribute.

Regards



Simon said...

All heliocentric arguments seem to forget one thing MOMENTUM!

For the "A plane going East to West would have to be flying faster than one going West to East" argument: Imagine this. If I am on a train going at 80 mph and I get up out of my seat, do I suddenly fly to the back of the train at 80 mph and crash into the wall? No! Of course not! Because of momentum, my walking speed gets added to the trains speed - it doesn't just magically stop the train moving!

For the "The atmosphere would have been long-since stripped off" argument: Again, momentum! The atmosphere is moving with the Earth and so is going at the same rate. Any fluctuations in this rate are comparatively small and the Earth's gravitational field will keep the atmosphere in place.

Now, I want to ask you a question. Has there ever been a peer-approved scientifically valid paper that said geocentricity is right? No! Has there ever been a peer-approved scientifically valid paper that said heliocentricity is right? Yes! Multiple times. The famous 'WOW' signal was actually a pulsar millions of light-years away. While the scientists were trying to find out where this signal came from, they looked at an effect called the Doppler Effect*. If the radio waves coming back from the source were blue-shifted or red-shifted, that means the source was either moving away from us, or moving towards us. They found that the signal was red-shifted, but it was getting less so over the next few weeks and eventually started getting blue-shifted. They calculated this cycle would repeat once every year exactly. They failed to prove the source was moving, but instead managed to prove the Earth went round the Sun in a year.

So there you go. Disprove me successfully and I will be very impressed.

*The Wikipedia page on the Doppler Effect, if you want to have a read

Anonymous said...

Hello, name is Jon. How come earths orbit hasn't been changed from the billions upon billions of gallons of oil dug from the earth in the last 100 years to then be converted into a gas? Wouldn't that drastically alter orbital trogectory? Id like to note their are 7 billion humans and rising, shouldn't the weight from that also affect earth orbit?

Anonymous said...

Hi Eric,

Do you have any articles or interviews that focus on the esoteric study of astrology and how it truly "works" in a spiritual sense outside the matrix programmes?

Thank You!

Anonymous said...

Hi,
how do we read a compass if we complete a circular tour ?
At some point east becomes west does it not ?

Anonymous said...

I can prove that the Earth is not spinning and have never believed it was anyway. Felix Baumgartner was up 120,000 ft above Earth sitting and waiting to jump and do his freefall. He has video capturing the whole thing which is on Youtube which is clear as anything and guess what? The Earth is not spinning and it never has been.


There are countless controlled balloons with cams on them going to the edge of and even out of the atmosphere and clearly shows the earth is NOT SPINNING.

Unknown said...

There must be film or video records of a meteor entering the Earth's atmosphere going from East to West, or even just directly towards the Earth, going neither East nor West. In that case, I would expect there to be obvious massive light trails to the East from the supposed 1000-mile/hour travel of the atmosphere from West to East being impacted by an object not traveling in that direction. If the meteor lasts long enough in the atmosphere and it was not going East, I would also expect its trajectory to change (if only slightly) towards the East. Is there any video evidence of such a thing? I ask because I don't know.

Or here's another question: how do geo-stationary satellites maintain their orbit over the same point on the Earth's surface, if the Earth is rotating at 24000 miles/hour? Do they have sufficient fuel and engine to propel them for years in that stationary orbit? These are not large Saturn V rockets - so if a small engine and fuel source, whatever that may be, can achieve such speeds, how do I get one of them for my car?

Any comments? Thanks!

Unknown said...

The earth is static...And the sun revolves around it!! Here is the proof containing more than 100 objections in light of modern physics and common sense..
Grow Up

http://www.barkati.net/book/english/Complete_AFairSuccess.pdf

Anonymous said...

I'm a globe-geocentrist and i think too, that the distances in the heliocentric system to large. But i cannot response the argument of a heliocentric believer, that the distances to planets were measured by radio waves and the huge distances were therefore prooved.

What is to say to this argument?

(Excuse my humbling english, i'm a german people)

THE CLIMATE WARS said...

A mind in lockdown is a sad thing to see.

There's more than one kind of Woke

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 219 of 219   Newer› Newest»