Thursday, October 11, 2012

Why I Train Wing Chun

As a martial artist, first and foremost, I’m not interested in “Wing Chun,” “tradition,” or “style.”  I’m not interested in flashy acrobatics, winning tournaments, or what looks cool.  I’m only interested in what works.  What keeps you alive in real life and death fight situations?  What is the most effective way to defeat one or many opponents with or without weapons?  How is the human body best trained to become a master of self-defense?  What techniques, drills, and concepts must become second-nature to ensure proper reaction and adaptation during the chaos of real-life combat?  How can any system or style cover the literally infinite potential dangers faced?  With so many different martial arts from all over the world, how can one separate the wheat from the chaff and discern which is the most effective? 

Real fighting is dirty, no holds barred, spontaneous full-force explosive aggression.  In actual combat there are no rules, no regulations, no referees, no traditions, no tap-outs and no gloves.  So any system which caters to and trains with rules, regulations, and traditions in mind is ultimately not preparing you for actual combat but for unrealistic sparring situations. For example the average UFC (Ultimate Fighting Championship) MMA (Mixed Martial Arts) match lasts almost 9 grueling minutes.  The average street fight, however, lasts a mere 9 seconds!  Why the huge difference?  Is it just because they’re wearing boxing gloves?  No.  The fact of the matter is that tournament fighting, and martial styles which cater to tournament fighting (such as MMA, Boxing, Kickboxing, Muay Thai, Taekwondo, Karate, Jui Jitsu, Judo, Wrestling etc.) all have a huge list of highly effective techniques and vulnerable targets which are completely off-limits!  The reason they are prohibited is because they are too effective, will end the fight too quickly, and could severely injure, maim or kill the opponent! 

In the interest of clean competitions and good sportsmanship it makes sense that certain targets and techniques be prohibited from tournament fights, but what happens when rules and traditions start to dictate your martial training?  Instead of always practicing the most effective techniques on the softest targets, you actually train less effective techniques on harder targets!  How can repeatedly drilling less than optimum techniques at less than optimum targets, make you an optimum fighter?  As the saying goes, practice doesn’t make perfect, only perfect practice makes perfect.

In Western Boxing, for instance, the extreme limitations are clear for everyone to see. You wear huge padded gloves and almost every fighting technique imaginable is prohibited except punches to the torso and head.  No kicks, no knees, no elbows, no head butts, no groin strikes, no eye gouges, no grappling, no throws, just round after round of getting pounded by padded punches.  Boxing is a perfect example of a fighting style with so many rules that its practical self-defense applications are very limited.  It is clearly a sport, and not a science of self-defense.   Boxing’s punches are undoubtedly second to none, but there is much more to effective self-defense than good punching. How does Western Boxing prepare you to defeat an opponent carrying a knife?  How does Boxing deal with kicks, takedowns and grappling?  How does Boxing handle multiple attackers?  The answers are all the same:  It doesn’t, because it’s against the rules and not part of the game. 

In the game/sport of Taekwondo all punches to the head, kicks to the legs, and grabbing techniques are prohibited so the result is a style full of fast-paced flashy spinning jumping head kicks.  These are definitely fun to watch and work during point sparring competitions, but in real-life combat, almost the entire repertoire of Taekwondo’s techniques are pitifully ineffective and leave you off balance and vulnerable.  Being a 2nd degree black belt and former Taekwondo instructor myself, I can say from experience that Taekwondo’s kicks are second to none, but there is much more to effective self-defense than good kicking.   

As a cocky 20 year old, I thought my sidekick alone would be fast and powerful enough to defeat my soon-to-be Wing Chun instructor in a series of full contact challenge fights.  I was quite sure that he couldn’t get past my legs and he was quite sure that he could.  After several philosophical discussions about fighting we decided to put his Wing Chun and my Taekwondo to the test.  Time and time again he waited for me to attack, parried my kicks, then completely dominated and destroyed me with an intense flurry of chain punches, stomp kicks, knees and elbows.  At best I clipped him a couple times with my kicks, but ultimately he would always take advantage of my one-legged, off-balance, side-facing positioning, maneuver behind, kick out my back leg, and take me down embarrassingly easily.

Muay Thai, Kickboxing, and MMA are much more dynamic and street-effective than Boxing or Taekwondo making use of knees, elbows, leg kicks, clinches, throws, and takedowns.  But once again there are no groin or throat strikes allowed, no eye gouges, no knee stomp kicks, no defense against weapons, and no defense against multiple attackers.  These few limitations may seem insignificant, but keep in mind that most street fights involve either a weapon or multiple attackers, and the three most vulnerable targets on the human body are the eyes, groin and throat!  This means that Muay Thai, Kickboxing, and MMA are not training or utilizing the most effective targets or techniques when it comes to real life or death combat.   

These styles also use a lot of low roundhouse kicks to the opponent’s legs with the intention of wearing them down over time, which sounds good and works wonders during tournament bouts, but the average street fight lasts only 9 seconds and involves multiple attackers, so in actual combat there’s no time to strategize several kicks for wearing down your opponent’s legs.  You need more quick, direct, and devastating attacks to vulnerable targets.  Wing Chun’s two main kicks, the inside stomp kick to the knee and front snap kick to the groin, are so brutally effective that they are banned in all sports fighting and martial arts tournaments.  The inside stomp kick smashing down at 45 degrees onto the kneecap reliably and easily takes down and/or breaks the leg of even very strong opponents.  And of course one good swift kick to the groin beats a whole barrage of Muay Thai leg kicks any day.  So whether it’s Kickboxing, Muay Thai, Taekwondo, Karate or MMA, two of the most devastating kicks are prohibited and so rarely if ever trained. 

BJJ (Brazilian Jiu Jitsu), Judo, Wrestling, and other grappling styles have little or no striking whatsoever which is obviously a severe limitation.  No punches, no kicks, no knees, no elbows, no eye gouges, no hair pulling and no biting, yet these styles spend almost all their training time on the ground.  How realistic is a ground fight without any striking, eye gouges, hair pulling or biting?  Even MMA, which allows ground striking, still prohibits attacks to the neck and spine, eye gouges, groin strikes, hair pulling and biting.  This is the only reason UFC/MMA/BJJ fighters spend so long rolling around the mat together vying for position like a couple of entangled homosexual hyenas.   

If they were allowed to elbow necks, stomp spines, gouge eyes, strike groins, pull hair and bite, the entirety of their well-developed “ground games,” the entire art of BJJ would be useless.  Spending minutes jockeying for a side-mount or trying to pull off an arm-bar is highly ineffective if your opponent is wildly gouging at your eyes, attacking your groin, pulling your hair and biting you!  The whole idea of martial artists needing a complex “ground game” as seen in UFC/MMA/BJJ is erroneous anyway because when real fights go to the ground, there’s no springy, soft canvas cushion to roll around on.  In the street it’s concrete and the odds are whoever makes the first takedown wins.  These styles spend almost all their training time on the ground working on the philosophy that 95% of fights go to the ground.  While it’s true that most competition MMA fights go to the ground at some point, this is not the case with street fights.  A cursory glance through YouTube’s many fine street fights caught on camera show the majority of fights being won with stand-up striking techniques, not with ground grappling techniques.  Besides, when facing multiple attackers, going to the ground simply isn’t a viable option because while you're busy rolling around wrestling one guy, his buddies will all be standing straight punt-kicking the snot out of you.

Capoeira, Drunken Boxing, Wu Shu, and other overly flowery forms of Kung Fu are beautiful to watch and wonderful for developing strength, flexibility and flow, but when it comes to real life or death combat these flashy acrobatic styles also fail in many respects.  Too much emphasis is placed on dancing and feigning the opponent, often leaving the practitioner off-balance and vulnerable to attack.   

Most of the fancy offensive striking techniques are indirect, less powerful, and less effective than tried and true quick, direct strikes along the opponent’s centerline (as in Wing Chun).  So much time is spent practicing flowery non-combative dancing or acrobatic techniques that proper application and actual fighting often takes a back seat.  Karate and several traditional martial arts also have a similar problem incessantly training rigid robotic forms, stances, blocks and strikes absolutely inapplicable and unusable in the street.  For example the traditional front stance low, high, inside and outside blocks of Karate are so slow, wide, rigid and telegraphed that they cannot work even against an unskilled opponent.  All Karate practitioners realize this and never use the traditional blocks while sparring anyway, but still spend countless hours training these useless forms and techniques regardless.

There are many martial systems which don’t fall into the “irrelevant tradition” or “sport fighting” traps and are thus much more street-ready such as Krav Maga, Silat, FMA, Aikido, Wing Chun and Jeet Kune Do.  These styles tend to be much more formidable and effective due to the fact that they are always training with actual combat in mind and not slaving to sports rules or ancient irrelevant traditions.  To my sensibilities however, Wing Chun stands out and maintains a distinctive edge over the rest with iron-clad concepts and unique techniques such as simultaneous attack/defense, immoveable elbows, three triangles, centerline theory, sticky hands/legs, and chain punching. 

Wing Chun is all about whatever works.  Arm and leg breaks, throat and groin strikes, eye gouges, finger locks, hair pulling, biting and whatever else works is fair game.  The movements and principles are so universally applicable to any fight situation, that empty-hand practice, weapons practice, and empty vs. weapons practice all utilize exactly the same structures and techniques.  This means regardless of the fight situation, you are poised and prepared with muscle-memory to react more effectively to any empty-hand or weapon attack, because all your training is universally applicable regardless of how many attackers, how strong they are, or which weapons they have.  

Wing Chun has often been called “the thinking man’s martial art” and if you have made it this far through the article you can probably appreciate why.  Originally however Wing Chun was not a “man’s” martial art at all, but the only fighting system in the world known to have been invented by a woman.  A Shaolin nun named Ng Mui developed the art over three centuries ago by taking only the most direct and effective techniques of Shaolin Kung-Fu and creating a compact martial training system specially suited and designed to defeat bigger, stronger and faster opponents.  Ng Mui and her female student Yim Wing Chun used this new style against several men in challenge fights.  Both became legendary figures in Kung-Fu history, neither of them ever losing a fight.

So how does a man benefit from training a woman’s martial art?  Think about this:  If you get in a fight with someone who is smaller, slower and weaker than you, then your natural advantages will almost always defeat such an opponent without any training necessary.  Therefore, if you are going to learn a self-defense style, shouldn't it specifically train you to defeat opponent(s) who are bigger, stronger, and faster than you?  Since women on average tend to be smaller, slower and weaker, Wing Chun seeks to compensate for these natural disadvantages by relying on body mechanics and touch sensitivity instead of speed and brute force to overcome an opponent.  Having trained this fighting system daily for 10 years now, I can personally attest to its efficacy and intricacies.  It is ostensibly a simple martial art with a swift learning curve, but contains incredible depth and complexity enough to spend a lifetime perfecting, always potential for refining and developing to new levels of proficiency.  I have researched and trained various martial arts for most of my life, all with their unique pros and cons, advantages and disadvantages, and I respect the traditions and practitioners of all martial disciplines, but for me Wing Chun, based on its intelligent scientific principles and sheer brutal effectiveness stands head and shoulders above the rest. 





34 comments:

Anonymous said...

Wow, I am really inspired by this. I want to start learning this :) // Hamdi

Anonymous said...

Legendary Ping Pong Tournament

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SncapPrTusA

Eric Dubay said...

Hey Hamdi, check out this Wing Chun practitioner. She's only 15 years old (a year younger than you if I remember correctly) and already very impressive:

Armenian Wing Chun Girl

:)

Anonymous said...

Thanks for writing this Eric.

You have skillfully put into words
something that I've always known
in
the the back of my mind but could
not quite conceptualize well; after
today I can now gracefully accept
that I have "wasted" a good bunch
of years learning Shotokan and must
admit I simply have no good defense
against wing chun attacks like those
(and much less effective attack strategies)
and that its time to start from scratch
again, oh well.


Could you recommend a specific video
course, video teacher or youtube channel
to start getting familiar with the
wing chun basics while I look for a
proper school in my area?


Cheers,
Vic, Germany.

Anonymous said...

Great write up but I have to disagree. MMA/UFC fighters are not robots. They are not going to spin around lost and blind because there is no ring, gloves or ref.
"Psst.. MMA guy this is a real fight, no rules, no gloves, you CAN pull his hair, gouge his eyes, kick in the groin, bite, claw, etc because he's going to do the same to you". Out of the gym and ring you really don't think these guys/gals can think? Lots of them also come from the streets and know what's real and what's sport.

No disrespect but a different view that you may not see

Eric Dubay said...

Thanks for the comments Vic and Anon. Since Wing Chun relies on touch sensitivity and body mechanics it really is impossible to learn via video. In fact, I'm of the opinion that it's nearly impossible to learn adequately in a class setting as well. Originally Wing Chun was only taught privately from teacher to student and that's how I train as well because becoming proficient in Wing Chun requires many hours of chi sao/sparring and if you're constantly fighting lesser opponents it's impossible to develop past a certain level. Having said that, there are several great instructional YouTube videos out there to whet your whistle and start getting you familiar with the concepts.

For Anon, you're making a valid point, and I'm not saying that MMA fighters won't include those techniques and targets in a street fight. However, who is more likely to succeed in real combat, someone who trains everyday the most effective techniques on the most vulnerable targets, or someone who trains everyday less than optimum techniques on less vulnerable targets? If you train Muay Thai roundhouse kicks to the thighs and teep kicks to the body every day, and I train Wing Chun knee stomp kicks and groin snap kicks every day, when it comes time to react in a real fight situation, will you react with what you've trained everyday or will you suddenly switch it up and start using the superior Wing Chun kicks? Why not just train the most effective techniques all the time and get those deep into your muscle-memory? Also why waste so much time learning ground grappling when it doesn't work in real life? I challenge any BJJ/MMA fighter to attack me using BJJ rules while I defend myself using Wing Chun, and see what happens. While they're frantically trying to gain a full-mount I'll be bicycle kicking them with my heels, striking their groin, gouging their eyes, pulling their hair and biting them. I guarantee they will be blind, bald, and impotent before I tap-out. The sport of MMA does a great job toughening you up and preparing you for the brutality of real fighting, but it also wastes your time teaching you pitifully ineffective ground defense, and constantly drilling less than optimum techniques on less than optimum targets. Peace

Ilya said...

Dear Eric,
Thanks for writing good albeit a bit "hot-tempered" article.
Some additional thoughts:
1. It is not the style which wins or looses. It is a specific individual in specific circumstances surrounding him/her. As Chinese saying says that the spirit is more important, not a martial art technique. Properly motivated man can crush/kill (has a good chance of) another human being without any knowledge of martial arts. On the other hand person with ONE perfect technique can utilize it far more effectively than one might think.
2. One of the great things about Wing Chun is that it brings you health and longevity, which may not be the case with such styles as Thai boxing.
3. As any other style Wing Chun may not suit people depending on their body structure, health condition etc. Neither one of us has ideal bodies..Hence different martial arts for different people.
Good luck and fruitful practice.
Ilya

Eric Dubay said...

Thanks Llya, you're certainly right that different martial arts are more/less suited for different people and when it comes down to it sheer will power and fighting spirit is often more important than technical ability. Peace!

Anonymous said...

Eric, I could not agree more with you regarding the necessity of being
one-on-one with a qualified teacher for this kind of training;

however, if you are like me and know you are going to be stuck for

the next 5 months under 2 meters of snow and -20° weather you have

to get a bit creative and a video course is kinda my only option right now in order

not to get uninterested in the subject until I find a suitable teacher

so I found this: (...I'm already in lesson 13, yay!)


The Master Wong youtube channel:

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL2939A535FABE8ECA&feature=plcp

Level 1 alone consists of 60 3-minute parts that show you the
basics, such as standing, moving, balancing, blocking, simple drills,
punches and kicks, both solo and with a partner.

And NO, I know this is NOT the
answer, but if in a few months I
can stop a coked-up psycho coming
at me with a broken bottle cause
of you and these silly videos, well...


Thanks again bud for getting so
many people interested on so many
life-changing and interesting topics!

Stay skeptic,
Vic, Germany.

Eric Dubay said...

Haha, yeah Master Wong is pretty good, funny and a bit crazy. To help you get started while you're snowed in check out the videos in my Introduction to Wing Chun. I can also recommend you checking out Emil Martirossian, Emin Boztepe, Gary Lam, David Peterson, and GM Keith Kernspecht who is awesome and lives/teaches in Germany! That would be cool if you could train with him. Good luck and let me know how it goes :)

Anonymous said...

Wing Chun is one of the worst final systems out there. How do you spar with no rules, without picking up a serious injury?

You would get taken down and submitted by a competent wrestler. Try escaping from side control from someone who has good BJJ.

Or why don't you go along to one of the local Muay Thai schools and have spar someone and see how long you last.

Wing Chun does not work, chain punching is predictable and weak. And who needs to learn how to eye gouge or grab someone's balls its quite easy.

You are also paranoid conspiracy theorist, this may also contribute to the fact you do not know how to fight and not very bright.

Eric Dubay said...

I have several students cross training and/or with a Muay Thai/BJJ/Wrestling background and I have no trouble dealing with them. I can hold my own against Muay Thai just fine and I've yet to be submitted by BJJ. I'm a conspiracy researcher/writer but I'm not paranoid. Someone who feels the need to posture and ego-dump in my comments section is likely more paranoid than I.

Anonymous said...

I trained karate and tae kwon do. maybe it's because i've never gone to a school that trains for competition but my tae kwon do instructor laid it out flat that you do not kick above the waist in a street fight. We had a heel stomp for the knee and a ball of the foot kick for under the knee cap and shin kick for the side of the knee. We also had a toe snap for the groin. General premise break the knee or kick the nuts, trip and kick about the head and neck until done moving. Because it started as a war aid expected you to already have a sword or spear I feel tae kwon do lacks much hand skill. Still we practiced weapons evasion and disarming daily. With Okinawan karate i fail to see it as distinctly different from ving tsun except that it starts from a longer range but crossing the range using forward motion, root and center line to keep your opponents weapons out or effective combat is all very similar. after training ving tsun I have found my personal karate to be maybe over focused on power, like trying to use a Ferrari as a ralley car. After all that i have found ving tsun to be incredibly effective and the most useful of all my martial training! I have nothing like your training and experience, but I think your claim that these other arts lack effective street technique or that someone learning them won't be practicing them daily is ill conceived and misleading.

Eric Dubay said...

I think your claim that these other arts lack effective street technique or that someone learning them won't be practicing them daily is ill conceived and misleading.

I'm sure they would be practicing daily and that all martial systems have effective street techniques incorporated. When I'm training, however, the combative form of Wing Chun that I practice/teach is 100% reality-based, where many other systems are based on irrelevant traditions or sports competitions. As it seems you have also found, Wing Chun is just a step above the rest from my perspective, that's not to mislead or misconceive, just my opinion. Peace

Anonymous said...

PS to "I trained karate..." thanks for openly and calmly responding to comments, even ones that disagree with you! Supposedly my karate school traces it roots all the way to the guy who brought kung fu to Okinawa and adapted it for fighting samurai. I don't know it could all be myth or bs, it was training with a security job I did for four years. My boss was a sensei. many techniques were similar. the general understanding of space, footwork, and how to attack you enemy's structure are along the same concepts. The thing that makes Ving Tsun a better combat for me is the amount of time I actually spend training sensitivity, reflex, and technique with someone who is really better than me. Also even though I am still a year or more from free sparring in our system of Ving Tsun, failure equals hit! I'm 6'1" 240lbs and fairly fit, I can't tell you how much I enjoy being pushed around and beat on by a girl half my size. That never happened to me before. It really does work!!!

Josh

Rick Dunlap said...

love the comment on BJJ...ruined JJ, created a whole culture of thuggery, and utilizes dojo rules that wont work on the street...stalling to outlast an opponent so you can eventually get their back etc...

Why Kano invented Judo....which has also been ruined by rules and false guardrails.

Kung Fu, Tai Chi, JJ, various other "Arts" are beautiful, effective and useful in the real world in their pure form...

Anonymous said...

I enjoyed your excellent article about Wing Chun.
Wish that moron of joe rogan would read this article instead of insulting Wing Chun & other traditional Martial Arts.
Wing Chun truly is an awesome art of self defense and survival.

Eric Dubay said...

Thanks guys, I totally agree! Peace

tututyrururtu ututrurtu said...

How good were the wing chun guys who entered the early UFC events?

Because the earlier ones allowed groin strikes & throat strikes I believe, definitely allowed groin strikes & grabs.

The reason muay thai & BJJ became the go to systems for mma was because they did so well in the earlier style vs style events.

Personally I think going to the ground in a streetfight is not a good idea so BJJ losing effectiveness to a certain degree for the street, but it would help you regain your feet if taken down.

Judo or wrestling may be better as they would help you prevent the takedown better.

Saying boxing is one of the worst for the street is wrong in my opinion, I trained Krav maga for 4 years, One of the few street fights I ever got in involved a boxer, he knocked me out with one punch. Boxing has the potential to make you better with your hands than nearly any other martial art.

Lastly Pankration, martial art of the ancient greeks (who were constantly at war), was wrestling, submission fighting & boxing with a few low kicks thrown in. If it hadn't been effective they would not of used it.

Thanks

Eric Dubay said...

Hey, yeah, I've yet to see WC adequately represented in the MMA fighting scene. The more I learn of various arts like Boxing, Muay Thai, Taekwondo, Karate, Judo, Wrestling, BJJ, Krav Maga, Aikido, the more I respect all of them but for different very specific reasons. They all have clear advantages and disadvantages and as a mixed martial artist, you want to aim to integrate them seamlessly so that, as Master Ken says, "you have the best of all, worst of none": Ameridote :)

Master Ken's Enter The Dojo

Anonymous said...

As somebody who lives in foshan guangzhou and has moved within WC circles I feel I should address a few points.

Part 1

1) Street vs Sport

There is a common claim that WC will be more effective in the street as other arts operate within a rule set.

Firstly can you walk into a WC class and start thrusting your crotch towards people as a defensive move?

Can you bring a shot gun and shoot your chi sao partner in the face?

If the answer to these are no then you can clearly see WC has a rule set.

Secondly if Usain Bolt beat you every time you race him at the 100 meters timed event would you expect to run much faster than him in street clothes on pavement?

Would you expect to beat somebody who wins every time you swim a timed lap to lose when you swim across a river as one is a spot and the other is not?

How is somebody who can kick and punch much harder and hit targets on a regular basis all of a sudden unable to change targets when it becomes a street fight?

The killer blow to the sport vs street comes from Bas Rutten.

Arguable nobody has had more documented street fights, most times with multiple opponents than this man. (and been jailed for it)

He makes it very clear, if you cannot fight under the small pressure of inside the ring, you will certainly not be able to perform under the much higher pressure of life and death.

Eric Dubay said...

Great points Anonymous, thanks for sharing :)

Anonymous said...

Very good article!!

However,

I almost spit my coffee over my screen when I read the word 'aikido'.

Aikido is truly at the bottom of the list in terms of effectiveness.

Eric Dubay said...

Thanks Anon, when trained to a high level Aikido is a formidable system of soft-style self-defense, but until developed to a master level, you're right, it's basically useless. Most strikers (and good grapplers) make short work of Aikido noobs.

j lo said...

Personally as a wing chun practitioner for 3 years and a karateka for 1 year I do not think there is a better style. All martial arts have been developed for combat and would not have survived if it had been ineffective due to challenges from other schools, styles and individuals. It comes down to the quality of the students, teachers, training methods, diets, the body type of the practitioner and the amount of time spent training. A boxer will beat an mma fighter at boxing, a taekwondo fighter will beat a mma figther at kicking, a judokan will beat an mma fighter at grappling and a jujitsu practitioner will beat an mma fighter at groundwork. this is because they have spent more time on that particular aspect. secondly some martial arts suit different body types e.g. a taekowndo fighter who is tall and skinny will not struggle as much as one who is chubby, muscley and short. the latter would better suit jujitsu or judo. third a person should not need to learn multiple disciplines to become a good figheter, he can use one style and adapt it so it has answers to the techniques of other styles. e.g. bjj has been developed by the gracies to the extent that it can take on almost any type of martial art by having defenses and counters to other styles. last of all mma and ufc are not the be all and end all of martial arts, it has indeed proved its effective no doubt but it is impossible to discover the perfect martial art as the various factors i have stated above affect the outcome of a fight. The questions is which martial art is the perfect one ?for you?

Eric Dubay said...

Awesome comment J Lo, thanks for sharing, totally agree on all points!

Anonymous said...

I need some info..i started training at Gary Lam'a Wing chun school in Alhambra for about month now and so far they've only have me practicing the first form..and master Lam doesent really pay much attention to me..when i walk in he just saids hi and plays with his cell phone.,so i just wonder in to a corner of the school practicing my form..students tell me its boring in the beginning but later it will pay off and i'll start learing the good stuff? Hmmm? Am i wasting my time or should i stick with it? I mean they even haven't should me a punch or a single self defense technique..

Eric Dubay said...

Hey Anon, thanks for the comment, sorry to hear about Gary Lam not giving enough individual attention... that is why I only teach private sessions. Wing Chun was originally taught from master to disciple, no classes, no belts, just one on one training. It's good to have different people to spar against and to practice multiple attackers, but for the most part, at least at the beginning, students need lots of one on one attention to get up to speed. I've had students from Moy Yat, Leung Ting, Gary Lam and others who all say they learned far more in their short time with me than they did in years at their respective schools. It's normal that you would still be on the first form after a month, but it's not normal that you should be ignored, not learn a single punch, and the instructor is playing on his cell phone. From what I've seen Gary Lam is an excellent WC practitioner, but not the best teacher... his broken English makes it difficult for him to convey his teachings in a way that resonates with native English speakers. You may want to see what other schools are in your area? Or take a Thailand Wing Chun Holiday? :)

Thailand Wing Chun Holiday

matthew said...

Memmek10k

Hi, Can I say this I have read both of the blogges about wing chun and street self defense and Why I train in wing chun. both of which I agree with 98% the last two % are how one uses the style in terms of training, For example my younger brother used to train in wing chun with me and would always kick my butt in Chi sao, and Sparring, but left due to college and came into Karate at the college which he is still attending. (I can't remember which branch) but is Very effective, and very dirty, but also on the flip side; My Wing Chun from which I was taught by my sifu (He taught both of us differently by the way. My younger brother was taught a more harder version of wing chun.) while mine uses the method of strong and Mobile structure,and the use of counters and traps. which I have to say works for me pretty well since I have used wing chun on the street for quite some time now.(I don't come looking for fights by the way it just sort of comes my way.) which has help me not to get hit by the way, since I am a one of those get hit any where I fall down and have to be put back together again type of guys. and in my closing statment I would like to say thank you for this blog and thank you for reading this comment. Best of wishes to your awesomeness

Anonymous said...

Enjoyed your article. I can tell from your commentary that you have given this subject a lot of thought. Like you I came from a Tae Kwon Do background (Chung Moo Kwan) before gradually moving over to Muay Thai/western boxing. I agree with you that MT and western boxing could absolutely use some of the 'dirty strikes' that are hallmarks of Wing Chun. Conversely, I think that Wing Chun could also use some of the physical conditioning (core conditioning, aerobic conditioning, etc) inherent in MT/western boxing. Also Wing Chun might want to take a look at some clinch fighting concepts and basic head coverage from MT/western boxing. I think a lot of folks have discounted the effectiveness of traditional arts like Wing Chun because of MMA events like UFC. I look forward to your response; I will also check out the rest of your site as well.

Eric Dubay said...

Thanks for the messages Matthew and Anon! Anon I think you're absolutely right that MT/Boxing could use with more dirty strikes and sound fighting concepts as found in WC, and you're also right that many WC schools leave out the very necessary element of physical conditioning which MT is well-known for. As for clinch fighting, freestyle Chi Sao practice if done correctly is far more advanced and effective than the MT clinch, but I'm all for cross-training in all arts and keeping whatever works for you personally. Peace!

Saifullah Azmi said...

I have trained in Taekwondo for 9 years and I'm a Blue belt. I always wanted to learn martial arts. But since Taekwondo was the only one available at my school I picked that cause I had to start some where. Now I'm going to University of Birmingham, UK and they have both Wing Chun and Ninjutsu.

Since I completely agree with your philosophy so, I want your opinion regarding the options available to me at my Uni.

Now before anyone says anything about ninjutsu. Let me tell u I have done loads of research from past 2 weeks. So I know it's not about being a ninja n all, rather "ninjutsu" is more of a marketing terminology. Its Bujutsu and other branches to be precise.

Now, since "ninjutsu" has one core idea i.e. survival. So do u think it fits in the situation of a real life fight where there are no rules?

I don't know much but as far as I have seen they have kicks, lock, blocks, throws, I mean they have everything and everything is allowed.

Ninjas use to learn everything and adapt their style to survive in different situation.

I already know Wing Chun is awesome.

I know it depends a lot on my teacher and all, but keeping all that aside I want to know what do u think of "ninjutsu" as an art in particular.

Eric Dubay said...

Hey Saifullah, thanks for the message! One of my current students trained Ninjitsu for several years before switching to Wing Chun. What I like about Ninjitsu is the realistic, survival aspect you mentioned, the weapons and stealth aspects are cool too. I would recommend checking out both schools/instructors in your area and see which one gives you a better gut feeling. To be honest, I think a good instructor of any style beats a bad instructor of the "best" style, so I would base your decision on the instructor moreso than the art, unless you're absolutely sure which art you want to learn and only have that option. Hope that helps! Peace

Saifullah Azmi said...

Thx Eric :) your advice was helpful and I will surely do some more research about the teacher and school and then make my decision.

Thanks again!